- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06486285
Auditory-Cognitive Dual-Task Intervention for Older Adults With Hearing Loss
Auditory-Cognitive Dual-Task Intervention for Older Adults With Hearing Loss: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) is a common and irreversible condition that has been recently associated with cognitive decline and dementia. Hence, if ARHL is treated earlier, the risk of dementia might decrease. However, in China, only 0.8% of older adults with hearing loss wore hearing aids, and over two-thirds (67.5%) of older adults with ARHL in Hong Kong had either been formally diagnosed or treated. There is also limited information on the feasibility and efficacy of hearing loss interventions for older people in Hong Kong. It is important to develop hearing loss interventions that have the potential to improve cognitive functions among older people.
Aims: This study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a new auditory-cognitive dual-task intervention (ACDT) for community-dwelling older adults with hearing loss, and to examine the preliminary efficacy of ACDT on their cognitive function.
Study design and Methods: This is mixed-model design, using a 2-arm, parallel-group, single-blinded, pilot randomized controlled trial (pilot RCT). A total of 60 community-dwelling older adults in Hong Kong who have mild to moderate hearing loss and normal cognitive performance will be recruited. Participants will be randomly assigned to the auditory-cognitive dual-task intervention group (ACDTG), and control group with no specific intervention (a "wait list" group) (CG). Each ACDTG participant will receive the intervention for 12 weeks (5 days x 60-min sessions per day). All participants in all groups will be assessed for cognitive function (primary outcome), social isolation, and loneliness, and hearing at baseline (T0), and after the intervention (T1). Post-intervention interviews will be conducted to obtain perspectives of participants in the ACDTG on the feasibility and acceptability of the ACDT intervention.
Data analysis: Participant characteristics and outcome variables will be analysed through descriptive statistics. Differences in cognition score and other outcomes across time points among the participant groups will be measured by Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). The statistical software package IBM SPSS version 26.0 will be used. Content analysis will used to analyse the post-intervention interviews.
Expected results: ACDT will be feasible for implementation and acceptable for community-dwelling older adults with hearing loss. While ACDT will not be able to improve underlying hearing in ARHL, it will be more effective on improving participants' cognitive function, social engagement and loneliness, and ability in information processing, interpretation and communication, than CG.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- PolyU
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- aged 60 and above living in the community;
- have mild to moderate hearing loss with a pure-tone average (PTA) between 25 and 60 dB in both ears (average hearing threshold at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz measuring by audiometer with headphones in a quite listening environment, no hearing aid use within the past 6 months;
- with normal cognitive performance (MoCA score ≥26); and
- are willing to and capable of providing informed consent and complying with study procedures.
Exclusion Criteria:
- have a history of psychosis, mania, bipolar disorder, substance use disorder or have current suicidal ideation;
- with severe or unstable medical illness, significant retrocochlear pathology or organic lesion responsible for hearing loss;
- a diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, FTD, or Parkinson's Disease; and
- taking medications such as antidepressants, sedatives, or antiepileptics that may affect cognition.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Auditory-cognitive dual-task training (ACDT)
The new auditory-cognitive dual-task training (ACDT) is a 12-week program (5 times/week, 60 minutes per day).
Auditory training (i.e., speech-in-noise training, rapid speech training and competing speaking training) will be incorporated with cognitive exercises involving the domains of executive function, perceptual-motor ability, memory, and complex attention.
|
The components of auditory training are designed based on an auditory training and aural rehabilitation program LACETM (Listening & Communication Enhancement) developed by our study team member.
The cognitive training was developed and tested feasible and valid in our study team's previous dual-task Zumba cognitive training.
|
|
No Intervention: Control
no specific treatment.
This is a "wait list" group, participants can choose either the Auditory-cognitive dual-task training or the cognitive training after 12 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Global cognition
Time Frame: will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
Global cognition will be measured by the Hong Kong-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA).
MoCA measures multiple cognitive domains, including attention, orientation, concentration, language, memory, executive functions and visuo-spatial skills.
MoCA ≥26 is considered as normal, while 22-26 refers to mild cognitive impairment.
|
will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Learning and memory
Time Frame: will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
The Chinese Auditory Verbal Learning Test will be used.
|
will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
|
Hearing
Time Frame: will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
will be measured by an audiometer with sound level meter (to measure ambient noise).
|
will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
|
Social isolation
Time Frame: will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
will be measured by validated abbreviated 6-item Chinese version of the Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS), which was developed specifically for use among older adults and shown to be both reliable and valid.The total score is calculated by finding the sum of the all items.
For the LSNS-R, the score ranges between 0 and 60, with a higher score indicating more social engagement.
For the LSNS-6, the score ranges between 0 and 30, with a higher score indicating more social engagement.
|
will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
|
Loneliness
Time Frame: will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
will be measured by the 6-item De Jong Gierveld loneliness scale (Chinese version).
The total score of the scale ranges from zero to six, with higher scores indicating greater feelings of loneliness.
A cut-off score of two or more was used to indicate the presence of loneliness, as recommended by van Tilburg and De Jong Gierveld
|
will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
|
Hearing
Time Frame: will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
Chinese version of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly and the five-point Communication Scale for Older Adults will be utilized.
The questionnaire consists of 10 items-five social/situational items and five emotional response items-with a total score range of 0-40.
A "YES" response receives four points, a "NO" response receives zero points, and a "SOMETIMES" response receives two points.
The HHIE-S total scores were used to classify the results into three categories: 0 to 8 (no self-perceived hearing handicap), 10-24 (mild to moderate handicap), and 26-40 (severe handicap).
According to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's proposed recommendations, a total HHIE-S score of 8 indicates the presence of a hearing handicap
|
will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
|
Attention or working memory
Time Frame: will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
will be measured by the digit span (forward and backward) and visual span (forward and backward) methods
|
will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
|
Information processing speed
Time Frame: will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
will be assessed by the performance on the Chinese Trail Making Test Part A
|
will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
|
Executive function
Time Frame: will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
Will be assessed by the Chinese Trail Making Test Part B
|
will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
|
Verbal fluency
Time Frame: will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
will be assessed by the category verbal fluency tests (animal, fruit, and vegetable)
|
will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
|
Motor skills
Time Frame: will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
will be evaluated by the grooved pegboard for both dominant hand and nondominant hand
|
will be assessed at baseline (T0), and Week 12 (immediately after the intervention) (T1)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ivy Zhao, Dr, School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- P0045159
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cognitive Decline
-
China Medical University HospitalNot yet recruitingSubjective Cognitive Decline | Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD)Taiwan
-
Jean-François DémonetUniversity of Lausanne HospitalsActive, not recruitingCognitive Performance | Functional Capacity | Subjective Cognitive Decline | Age-related Cognitive DeclineSwitzerland
-
University of Social Sciences and Humanities, WarsawNational Science Centre, Poland; Sanprobi Sp. z o. o.Active, not recruitingCognitive Decline | Cognitive Aging | Memory DeclinePoland
-
Rotman Research Institute at BaycrestSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; University of Waterloo; Toronto Rehabilitation... and other collaboratorsTerminatedSubjective Cognitive Decline | Age-Related Cognitive DeclineCanada
-
National Taiwan University HospitalNational Taiwan Science Education Center(NTSEC)CompletedCognitive Training | Subjective Cognitive DeclineTaiwan
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCompleted
-
Wageningen UniversityRoquette Frères; Sensus BV; Cosun Nutrition Center; Oceanium Ltd.; Technical University...Active, not recruitingSubjective Cognitive DeclineNetherlands
-
IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio FatebenefratelliUniversity of ChietiCompletedSubjective Cognitive DeclineItaly
-
National Cheng Kung UniversityUnknownEffects of Cognitive Strategy Training on Daily Function in People With Subjective Cognitive DeclineSubjective Cognitive DeclineTaiwan
-
University Hospital TuebingenCompletedSubjective Cognitive DeclineGermany
Clinical Trials on Auditory-cognitive dual-task training (ACDT)
-
Chang Gung UniversityCompletedStroke | Healthy Older AdultsTaiwan
-
Foundation University IslamabadCompletedMild Cognitive Impairment | ElderlyPakistan
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedIntellectual DisabilityPakistan
-
University of PlymouthRecruiting
-
University of LahoreCompletedStroke | Hemiplegia | Hemiplegia Following Ischemic StrokePakistan
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaNot yet recruiting
-
Riphah International UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Yu XiaoCompletedGait | Older Adults, Balance | Balance | Dual-task | Older Adults (65 Years and Older) | Quality of Life (QOL)China
-
University Hospital TuebingenParkinson StiftungNot yet recruitingMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder)Germany
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompletedSafety and Effectiveness