A Clinical Study to Assess the Safety, In-use Tolerability of Test Product in Healthy Adult Subjects With Dry and Sensitive Skin.

Open-Label, Interventional, Prospective, Safety, In-Use Tolerability Study of Test Product "No Rays, Thanks Mineral Sunscreen" in Healthy Adult Subjects With Dry and Sensitive Skin.

This is open-label, interventional, prospective, safety in-use tolerability study of test product "No Rays, Thanks Mineral Sunscreen" in healthy adult human subjects with dry and sensitive skin.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Dry Skin; Sensitive Skin
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: No Rays, Thanks Mineral sunscreen

Detailed Description

A total of 27 subjects with preferably equal number of males and non-pregnant /non-lactating females will be enrolled to ensure a total of 25 subjects complete the study.

The potential subjects will be screened as per the inclusion & exclusion criteria only after obtaining written informed consent from the subjects. Subjects will be pre-screened by the screening department of NovoBliss Research. Subjects will be called on the telephone by the recruiting department prior to the enrolment visit. Subjects will be told during screening (prior to enrolment) not to wear any facial make-up on the study visit day. The adult male and female subjects will be instructed to visit the facility as per the below visits.

• Visit 01 (Day 01): Screening, Enrolment, Baseline Evaluation, on site product usage, Post usage evaluation at T15 mins.
• Visit 02 (Day 15 ±2 Days): Evaluations, End of Study

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 27
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• India
  • Gujarat
    • Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India, 382481
      • NovoBliss Research Pvt.Ltd

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age: 18 to 55 years (both inclusive) at the time of consent.
2. Sex: Healthy male and non-pregnant/non-lactating females. (Preferably equal ratio of males and females)
3. Females of childbearing potential must have a self-reported negative pregnancy test.
4. Subject are generally in good health.
5. Subject with dry and sensitive skins. (As per the dermatological evaluation).
6. Subject is able to remain on stable doses of contraceptive or replacement hormonal therapy, including no therapy, 6 weeks prior to and for the duration of the study.
7. If the subject is of childbearing potential, is practicing and agrees to maintain an established method of birth control (IUD, hormonal implant device/injection, regular use of birth control pills or patch, diaphragm, condoms with spermicide or sponge with spermicidal jelly, cream or foam, partner vasectomy or abstinence). Females will be considered as non-childbearing potential if they are surgically sterile, have been post-menopausal for at least 1 year or have had a tubal ligation.
8. Subjects are willing to give written informed consent and are willing to come for regular follow up.
9. Subjects who commit not to use medicated skincare products other than the test product for the entire duration of the study.
10. Subject who have not participated in a similar investigation in the past three months.
11. Willing to use test product throughout the study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. History of any dermatological condition of the skin disease.
2. Subject with present condition of allergic response to any cosmetic product.
3. Subjects under chronic medication (e.g. aspirin-based products, anti-inflammatories, anti-histamines, corticotherapy etc.) that might influence the outcome of the study.
4. History of alcohol or drug addiction.
5. The subject has clinically significant skin disease, which may contraindicate participation, including psoriasis, eczema, skin cancer or other skin pathology.
6. Subjects having skin infections like bacterial, fungal, viral infections.
7. The subject has skin irritation, open wounds, cuts, abrasions, irritation symptoms or any dermatological condition on the face that can interfere with the reading.
8. Be wearing any facial makeup, including false eyelashes, on the day of the study visit.
9. Subjects having hypersensitive skin.
10. Subjects using other marketed sun screen products during the study period.
11. Any other condition which could warrant exclusion from the study, as per the dermatologist's/investigator's discretion.
12. Pregnant or breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant during the study period.
13. History of chronic illness which may influence the cutaneous state.

14. Subjects participating in other similar cosmetics, devices or therapeutic trials or skincare products within the last four weeks.

    -

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Other
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: No Rays, Thanks Mineral sunscreen; Wash your face with standard facewash and apply a pea size amount on the face in the morning.	Other: No Rays, Thanks Mineral sunscreen; Wash your face with standard facewash and apply a pea size amount on the face in the morning. Dosage form: semi-solid frequency: Once in a day Route of Administration: Topical

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in local intolerance assessment for skin irritation using 4-point scoring scale where 0 indicate absent and 3 indicate severe.	To assess the safety of the test product in terms of change in local intolerance assessment for irritation by dermatological assessment	On Day 01 at T15 minutes and on Day 15 (± 2 Days).
Change in local intolerance assessment for skin dryness using 4-point scoring scale where 0 indicate absent and 3 indicate severe.	To assess the safety of the test product in terms of change in local intolerance assessment for dryness by dermatological assessment	On Day 01 at T15 minutes and on Day 15 (± 2 Days).
Change in local intolerance assessment for skin oedema using 4-point scoring scale where 0 indicate absent and 3 indicate severe.	To assess the safety of the test product in terms of change in local intolerance assessment for oedema by dermatological assessment	On Day 01 at T15 minutes and on Day 15 (± 2 Days).
safety of the test product in terms of local intolerance assessment of irritation (Patient Global Assessment scale) where 0 indicate not at all and 10 indicate very severe.	To evaluate the safety of the test product in terms of local intolerance assessment of irritation by Patient Global Assessment scale.	On Day 01 at T15 minutes and on Day 15 (± 2 Days).
safety of the test product in terms of local intolerance assessment of dryness (Patient Global Assessment scale) where 0 indicate not at all and 10 indicate very severe.	To evaluate the safety of the test product in terms of local intolerance assessment of dryness by Patient Global Assessment scale.	On Day 01 at T15 minutes and on Day 15 (± 2 Days).
safety of the test product in terms of local intolerance assessment of oedema (Patient Global Assessment scale) where 0 indicate not at all and 10 indicate very severe.	To evaluate the safety of the test product in terms of local intolerance assessment of oedema by Patient Global Assessment scale.	On Day 01 at T15 minutes and on Day 15 (± 2 Days).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
where will you rank the test product in terms of appearance in which 1 indicate very poor and 5 indicate excellent.	To assess the test product in terms of change in organoleptic parameters- appearance through the subject product perception assessment.	On Day 01 and after test product usage on Day 01 at T15 minutes, and on Day 15 (±2 Days)
where will you rank the test product in terms of spreadibility in which 1 indicate very poor and 5 indicate excellent.	To assess the test product in terms of change in organoleptic parameters- spreadibility through the subject product perception assessment.	On Day 01 and after test product usage on Day 01 at T15 minutes, and on Day 15 (±2 Days)
where will you rank the test product in terms of texture in which 1 indicate very poor and 5 indicate excellent.	To assess the test product in terms of change in organoleptic parameters-texture through the subject product perception assessment.	On Day 01 and after test product usage on Day 01 at T15 minutes, and on Day 15 (±2 Days)
where will you rank the test product in terms of fragrance in which 1 indicate very poor and 5 indicate excellent.	To assess the test product in terms of change in organoleptic parameters-fragrance through the subject product perception assessment.	On Day 01 and after test product usage on Day 01 at T15 minutes, and on Day 15 (±2 Days)
where will you rank the test product in terms of absorption in which 1 indicate very poor and 5 indicate excellent.	To assess the test product in terms of change in organoleptic parameters-absorption through the subject product perception assessment.	On Day 01 and after test product usage on Day 01 at T15 minutes, and on Day 15 (±2 Days)
where will you rank the test product in terms of colour in which 1 indicate very poor and 5 indicate excellent.	To assess the test product in terms of change in organoleptic parameters-colour, through the subject product perception assessment.	On Day 01 and after test product usage on Day 01 at T15 minutes, and on Day 15 (±2 Days)
where will you rank the test product in terms of tackiness in which 1 indicate very poor and 5 indicate excellent.	To assess the test product in terms of change in organoleptic parameters-tackiness, through the subject product perception assessment.	On Day 01 and after test product usage on Day 01 at T15 minutes, and on Day 15 (±2 Days)
where will you rank the test product in terms of non-sticky/non-oily in which 1 indicate very poor and 5 indicate excellent.	To assess the test product in terms of change in organoleptic parameters-non-sticky/non-oily through the subject product perception assessment.	On Day 01 and after test product usage on Day 01 at T15 minutes, and on Day 15 (±2 Days)
where will you rank the test product in terms of light weight in which 1 indicate very poor and 5 indicate excellent.	To assess the test product in terms of change in organoleptic parameter light weight through the subject product perception assessment through the subject product perception assessment.	On Day 01 after usage of test product at T15 minutes, and on Day 15 (±2 Days)
where will you rank the test product in terms of satisfaction in which 1 indicate very poor and 5 indicate excellent.	To assess the test product in terms of organoleptic parameter in rate in terms of satisfaction.	On Day 01 after usage of test product at T15 minutes, and on Day 15 (±2 Days)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: NovoBliss Research Pvt Ltd
• Collaborators: Kayura Effects LLP
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Dr. Nayan K Patel, NovoBliss Research Pvt Ltd

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): December 19, 2024
• Primary Completion (Actual): January 4, 2025
• Study Completion (Actual): January 4, 2025

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: June 28, 2024
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 28, 2024
• First Posted (Actual): July 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 25, 2025
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 27, 2025
• Last Verified: February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Immune System Diseases; Hypersensitivity; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Dermatologic Agents; Protective Agents; Radiation-Protective Agents; Sunscreening Agents
• Other Study ID Numbers: NB240031-KE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No