HFNC vs. NIV in Acute COPD Exacerbations (HFNCstdy)

July 9, 2024 updated by: Adem Az, Haseki Training and Research Hospital

A High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Single-blind Randomized Trial

The investigators investigated the efficacy and safety of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) at different flow rates compared to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute exacerbations of Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who did not respond adequately to bronchodilator therapy and continued to exhibit hypercapnic respiratory failure. Specifically, the investigators tested the hypothesis that HFNC would be more effective at reducing partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) levels and hospital stay duration and would be associated with greater patient comfort than NIV.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The patients were divided randomly into one of three study groups: NIV, HFNC-30, and HFNC-50. The investigators collected patient data, including demographic characteristics (age and sex), vital signs upon admission (systolic blood pressure [SBP], respiratory rate [RR], and heart rate [HR]), complaints and symptoms upon admission, initial arterial blood gas parameters (e.g., pH, PaCO2, lactate, and bicarbonate), length of stay, ED revisits, patient satisfaction, intubation status, and clinical outcomes (hospitalization, admission to the intensive care unit [ICU], or 28-day mortality). Changes in arterial blood gas parameters (e.g., ΔpH, ΔPaCO2, Δlactate, and Δbicarbonate) before treatment vs. 30, 60, and 120 minutes after treatment were recorded using a pre-prepared case data form.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

137

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Fatih
      • Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey, 34265
        • Haseki Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- patients age ≥18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD who presented to the ED with exacerbations that did not respond to bronchodilator therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients aged younger than 18 years
  • patients had an arterial pH ≤ 7.25;
  • patients were in cardiopulmonary arrest;
  • patients had unstable cardiac arrhythmias or hemodynamic instability;
  • patients showed persistent hypoxemia despite supplemental oxygen therapy;
  • patients were unconscious or uncooperative;
  • patients could not protect their airway or manage secretions;
  • patients had cardiogenic pulmonary edema, active hemoptysis, pneumothorax, recent upper respiratory tract/esophagus surgery, significant airway obstruction (e.g., laryngeal mass or tracheal tumor), active upper gastrointestinal bleeding, or facial trauma or deformities

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: NIV group
The NIV group received bilevel-positive airway pressure.
The NIV group received bilevel-positive airway pressure. During NIV, the tidal volume was set to 6-8 mL/kg, positive expiratory end pressure (PEEP) to 3-5 cm H2O, and pressure support ventilation (PSV) to 8-12 cm H2O by a clinician with 8 years of experience. To reduce potential bias, the clinician was blinded to the null hypothesis.
Active Comparator: HFNC-30 group
HFNC-30 group received HFNC therapy at flow rates of 30 L/min.
The HFNC-30 group received HFNC therapy at flow rates of 30 L/min. During HFNC, the humidifier was set to an open position, the heated air temperature was maintained at 37°C, and the FiO2 was adjusted to maintain an oxygen saturation (SpO2) measured via pulse oximetry of at least 92%.
Active Comparator: HFNC-50 group
HFNC-50 group received HFNC therapy at flow rates of 50 L/min.
The HFNC-50 group received HFNC therapy at flow rates of 50 L/min. During HFNC, the humidifier was set to an open position, the heated air temperature was maintained at 37°C, and the FiO2 was adjusted to maintain an oxygen saturation (SpO2) measured via pulse oximetry of at least 92%.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in pH in arterial blood gas before vs. after treatment
Time Frame: at 30, 60, and 120 minutes relative to baseline
The investigators assessed the changes in pH before treatments vs. 30, 60, and 120 minutes after treatments.
at 30, 60, and 120 minutes relative to baseline
Changes in PaCO2 in arterial blood gas before vs. after treatment
Time Frame: at 30, 60, and 120 minutes relative to baseline
The investigators assessed the changes in PaCO2 before treatments vs. 30, 60, and 120 minutes after treatments.
at 30, 60, and 120 minutes relative to baseline
Changes in lactate in arterial blood gas before vs. after treatment
Time Frame: at 30, 60, and 120 minutes relative to baseline
The investigators assessed the changes in lactate before treatments vs. 30, 60, and 120 minutes after treatments.
at 30, 60, and 120 minutes relative to baseline
Changes in bicarbonate in arterial blood gas before vs. after treatment
Time Frame: at 30, 60, and 120 minutes relative to baseline
The investigators assessed the changes in bicarbonate before treatments vs. 30, 60, and 120 minutes after treatments.
at 30, 60, and 120 minutes relative to baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessing the need for rescue treatment and treatment-related complications
Time Frame: 120 minutes after initial treatment
The investigators assessed the need for invasive respiratory support and also evaluated treatment-related complications.
120 minutes after initial treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adem Az, M.D., Haseki Training and Research Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Stored in non-publicly available Available on request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on NIV

Subscribe