- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06499532
The Frequency of Trigeminocardiac Reflex During the Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Wisdom Teeth
The Frequency of Trigeminocardiac Reflex During the Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Wisdom Teeth and the Effect of Anesthesia Technique on the Development of the Reflex
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate trigeminocardiac reflex (TCR) formation during surgical extraction of mandibular impacted wisdom teeth in healthy adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- How often is the TCR encountered during the extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth?
- Do different local anesthesia techniques affect the frequency of this reflex?
- Is the relationship between the impacted teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve a predisposing factor for the development of this reflex
Researchers will monitor patients included in the study during the extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth.
Patients will undergo an anxiety test, and those found to be anxious will be excluded from the study (to avoid vasovagal events).
During the procedure, at seven different surgical stages, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and heart rate data will be recorded at the beginning and end of each stage.
The monitoring of TCR was conducted by observing a sudden bradycardia that developed within a few seconds and resolved when the procedure was paused, not preceded by any tachycardia. TCR will be investigated at three different levels according to different reference values in the literature.
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
The study included 40 patients who underwent extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth.Before the surgical procedure, the two most commonly used local anesthesia techniques in oral surgical practice, GG and IASB techniques, were applied. While IASB was always accompanied by buccal and mylohyoid area supportive anesthesia, no additional anesthesia was required in any patient receiving GG anesthesia. Evaluation of the patients was done using panoramic radiographs. The closest distance between the roots of the relevant wisdom teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) was recorded. In cases where the distance was less than 1 mm or where superimposition occurred, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were taken from the patients to confirm the distance in three dimensions.
Patients were divided into two groups based on the proximity of their wisdom tooth roots to the IAN (within 1 mm or more than 1 mm) and into two groups based on the anesthesia technique to be applied (GG-IASB). Subgroups were named as GG-0 (more than 1 mm from IAN), GG-1 (within 1 mm from IAN), IASB-0 (more than 1 mm from IAN), and IASB-1 (within 1 mm from IAN). Ten patients were evenly selected for each subgroup (GG-0, GG-1, IASB-0, IASB-1).
The surgeries included in the study were performed by a single surgeon. Impacted wisdom teeth were vertical and consisted of teeth retained in bone. For the surgical procedure, a sleeve flap was applied including distal horizontal and vertical relaxing incisions near the mesial papilla of mandibular second molar tooth.
TCR monitoring was conducted by observing the occurrence of sudden bradycardia, which could develop within a few seconds and show improvement upon pausing the procedure, not preceded by tachycardia. To ensure accurate and timely monitoring of this sudden process and to monitor potential asystole that could develop, patients were monitored. Monitoring was conducted using 5-channel Contec Medical Systems (Hebei, China) monitors. Throughout the procedure, heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure, and oxygen saturation were recorded. Records were taken at six separate surgical stages: initially during local anesthesia administration, and subsequently during incision/flap removal, removal of bone barriers, crown elevation, root elevation, and during suturing. Any sudden changes occurring during the procedure were recorded along with their onset times.
In defining TCR (Trigeminocardiac Reflex) in the literature, various reference measurement methods include sudden drops in heart rate by more than 10%, more than 20%, or dropping below 60 beats per minute. To highlight these different proportional reference drop values, severity grading was used in the observed TCR findings. Sudden drops in heart rate between 10% and 20% were classified as mild TCR (TKR-1), drops exceeding 20% and heart rate falling below 60 bpm as moderate TCR (TKR-2), and the presence of asystole, syncope, or need for atropine application as severe TCR (TKR-3). The total TCR across all grades was termed as t-TCR. TCR calculation was based on heart rate measurements taken at the beginning of each surgical stage.
To exclude vasovagal syncope, commonly cited as a neurological emergency and etiological factor, and high anxiety from the study, patients were initially subjected to anxiety tests, and individuals with high anxiety levels were excluded from the study. Patient anxiety levels were assessed using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State scale (STAI-S).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kütahya, Turkey, 43100
- Kütahya University of Health Sciences
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-30 years old
- Will have impacted tooth extraction for the first time
- Extraction indication for mandibular impacted wisdom teeth
- Systemically healthy individuals
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with high anxiety
- Female patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding
- Individuals with any systemic disease
- Individuals with suspicion of cysts and/or tumors in the area of mandibular impacted wisdom teeth
- Patients with mental or neurological disorders
- Patients using antidepressants
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Gow-gates anesthesia, distance to inferior alveolar nerve is more than 1 mm
The extraction of impacted wisdom teeth in patients forming this study arm was performed using the Gow-Gates anesthesia technique.
In these patients, the distance between the wisdom teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve is greater than 1 mm.
|
The surgical removal of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth in patients included in the study arms was performed using Gow-Gates anesthesia technique.
Patients were monitored for TCR during the procedure.
|
|
Experimental: Gow-gates anesthesia, distance to inferior alveolar nerve is less than 1 mm
The extraction of impacted wisdom teeth in patients forming this study arm was performed using the Gow-Gates anesthesia technique.
In these patients, the distance between the wisdom teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve is less than 1 mm.
|
The surgical removal of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth in patients included in the study arms was performed using Gow-Gates anesthesia technique.
Patients were monitored for TCR during the procedure.
|
|
Experimental: İnferior alveoler nerve block,distance to inferior alveolar nerve is more than 1 mm
The extraction of impacted wisdom teeth in patients forming this study arm was performed using the inferior alveolar nerve block technique and supplemental anesthesia (buccal- mylohyoid).
In these patients, the distance between the wisdom teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve is greater than 1 mm.
|
The surgical removal of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth in patients included in the study arms was performed using inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia technique and supplemental anesthesia (buccal- mylohyoid).
Patients were monitored for TCR during the procedure.
|
|
Experimental: İnferior alveoler nerve block, distance to inferior alveolar nerve is less than 1 mm
The extraction of impacted wisdom teeth in patients forming this study arm was performed using the inferior alveolar nerve block technique and supplemental anesthesia (buccal- mylohyoid).
In these patients, the distance between the wisdom teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve is less than 1 mm.
|
The surgical removal of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth in patients included in the study arms was performed using inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia technique and supplemental anesthesia (buccal- mylohyoid).
Patients were monitored for TCR during the procedure.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Heart rate monitoring
Time Frame: During the operation
|
All patients in all research arms monitored prior to extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth had their heart rate monitored throughout the procedure.
|
During the operation
|
|
Systolic, and diastolic blood pressure monitoring
Time Frame: During the operation
|
All patients in all research arms monitored prior to extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth had their systolic, and diastolic blood pressure monitored throughout the procedure.
|
During the operation
|
|
Oxygen saturation monitoring
Time Frame: During the operation
|
All patients in all research arms monitored prior to extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth had their oxygen saturation monitored throughout the procedure.
|
During the operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bedreddin Cavlı, Asst. Professor, Kütahya University of Health Sciences
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- KutahyaHSU/BedreddinCavli/001
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Impacted Third Molar Tooth
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakCompletedImpacted Third Molar Tooth | Third Molar Extraction Surgery | Third Molar Extraction | Impacted Third MolarIndia
-
University of CataniaCompletedImpacted Third Molar Tooth | Third Molar SurgeryItaly
-
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingImpacted Third Molar Tooth | Third Molar Extraction
-
Fayoum UniversityNot yet recruitingImpacted Third Molar Tooth
-
Medical University of SilesiaCompletedImpacted Third Molar ToothPoland
-
University of BaghdadRecruiting
-
esengul senCompletedImpacted Third Molar ToothTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey UniversityCompletedImpacted Third Molar ToothTurkey
-
Ankara UniversityCompletedImpacted Third Molar ToothTurkey
-
University of BaghdadCompletedImpacted Third Molar ToothIraq