Dupilumab and House Dust Mite Immunotherapy in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis (DuHDM)

July 12, 2024 updated by: Medical University of Silesia

Severe atopic dermatitis (AD) is a complex disease requiring systemic treatment. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of combined therapy consisting of dupilumab and sublingual dust mite allergen immunotherapy (SLIT-HDM) in patients with severe AD and HDM allergies.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with severe AD were included in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind 12-month trial; they received SLIT to HDM and/or dupilumab for 12 months and were compared to patients on cyclosporine. EASI, %BSA, and IsGA changes were analyzed in the different treatment arms from the beginning to the end of the 12th month. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients who achieved IsGA success and reduced medication scores.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study design This randomized, 12-month trial has performed in the Clinical Outpatient Allergy Department and six other outpatient cities. All included patients has received SLIT to HDM and/or dupilumab for 12 months and were compared to patients on cyclosporine.

Patients Patients were eligible if they met the following criteria: were diagnosed with AD a minimum of one year before the study (documented one year of therapy for AD); were between 18 and 45 years of age; had severe AD with an Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) >20 points, a %BSA (body surface area) >10 points, an IsGA (Investigator Global Assessment) = 4 points, a positive skin prick test (SPT) and a positive result for specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to extracts of D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae and to Der p 1; had negative results for SPT and sIgE to other inhalant allergens; and had no symptoms of allergic asthma and/or allergic rhinitis. The diagnosis of severe AD was based on the guidelines of the Polish Dermatological Society with more restrictive cut-off points on the EASI, %BSA, and IsGA scales, as presented in the inclusion criteria, to limit the study group to the most advanced forms of AD.14

The exclusion criteria included the following: other active dermatoses, systemic immunosuppressant treatment up to 7 months before the study, other chronic diseases, contraindications to sublingual immunotherapy or sarilumab, and lack of written consent. The dermatologist assessed signs of AD at each study visit.

Treatment The patients have received SLIT-HDM (ACARIZAX, ALk Abello, Denmark) with 12 SQ-HDMs of a standardized allergen extract of the house dust mites Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae (50/50%). The Acarizax tablets were removed from the blister unit immediately after opening the blister and placed under the tongue, where they were dissolved. Swallowing was avoided for approximately 2 minutes. Food and beverages were not ingested for 5 minutes after intake of the tablet. The daily dose was one tablet every day for 12 months. Dupilumab treatment was administered according to established recommendations. Briefly, the patient received a single initial dose of 600 mg of dupilumab followed by subsequent doses of 300 mg every 2 weeks.

All patients used emollients. During therapy, patients with clinical signs of bacterially infected skin were allowed to receive treatment with topical mupirocin or/and a 7-day course of amoxicillin or/and prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg) for seven days for any occurrence of skin exacerbation, including superinfection. In the control group, cyclosporine was administered at 3.5 mg/kg at the start of therapy, with the possibility of modifying the dose according to symptoms after a minimum of 6 months of therapy. Further treatment was administered for a minimum of another six months (12 months in total). Treatment was discontinued if adverse effects occurred.

In all groups, oral antihistamines such as desloratadine and topical medications were added depending on the individual disease. If there was clinical worsening of AD (reported significant severity of itching, the appearance of erythroderma, and new skin lesions of a large area), the patient also received oral glucocorticosteroids at a dose of 10 mg of encortolon per 7 days.

Symptomatic treatment was assessed via the following medication scores: one point for daily use of desloratadine, mometasone furoate cream, or mupirocin ointment, 7 points for every course of amoxicillin and 10 points for the course of encortolon. The patients were required to record symptomatic drug use on the diary card

The statistical analysis was performed using Statistica version 8.12 (SoftPol, Cracow, Poland). Nonparametric tests were used because the data were not normally distributed. The Wilcoxon test was used to analyse differences between the groups. ANOVA was used to compare the scale scores. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

132

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosed with AD a minimum of one year before the study (documented one year of therapy for AD)
  • between 18 and 45 years of age
  • severe AD with an Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) >20 points, a %BSA (body surface area) >10 points, an IsGA (Investigator Global Assessment) = 4 points, a positive skin prick test (SPT)
  • a positive result for specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to extracts of D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae and to Der p 1;
  • negative results for SPT and sIgE to other inhalant allergens;
  • no symptoms of allergic asthma and/or allergic rhinitis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other active dermatoses, systemic immunosuppressant treatment up to 7 months before the study, other chronic diseases,
  • contraindications to sublingual immunotherapy or dupilumab,
  • lack of written consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: SLIT HDM
Patients received sublingual allergen immunotherapy (Acarizax), adding to symptomatic therapy for atopic dermatitis (according to recommendations).
sublingual immunotherapy to house dust mites
Active Comparator: biologic
Patients received dupilumab, added to symptomatic therapy for atopic dermatitis (according to recommendations.)
dupilumab - biologic therapy for atopic dermatitis
Active Comparator: Combi therapy
Patients received sublingual allergen immunotherapy (Acarizax) and dupilumab, added to symptomatic therapy for atopic dermatitis (according to recommendations).
sublingual immunotherapy to house dust mites
dupilumab - biologic therapy for atopic dermatitis
Placebo Comparator: cyclosporine
Patients received cyclosporine added to symptomatic therapy for atopic dermatitis (according to recommendations).
cyclosporine used in atopic dermatitis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in EASI (the Eczema Area and Severity Index) scale
Time Frame: 12 months
objective improvement of skin lesions in the course of atopic dermatitis based on assessment using standardized questionnaire tests EASI. The EASI assessed disease extent on a scale of 0 to 6 in 4 defined body regions plus an assessment of erythema, infiltration, and/or population; excoriation; and lichenification, each on a scale of 0 to 3. A formula was then used to calculate the total score for each of the 4 regions, which were then added together. Interpretation of the EASI result: 0 = no change, 0.1-1.0 = almost no change, 1.1-7.0 = mild in intensity, 7.1-21.0 = moderate intensity, 21.1-50.0 = high intensity, 50.1-72.0 = very severe (points)
12 months
Changes in BSA% (Body Surface Area) scale
Time Frame: 12 months
Ii atopic dermatitis, %BSA was categorised according to severity bands: clear (0%), mild (> 0 to < 16%), moderate (16 to < 40%), and severe (40-100%) (percentage)
12 months
Changes in IsGA (investigator global assessment) scale
Time Frame: 12 months
The IsGA is a doctor-assessed outcome that evaluates overall AD severity on a 5-point scale ranging from clear (0) to severe (4) or very severe (5).
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Significant reduction in IsGA scale
Time Frame: 12 months
the proportion of patients who achieved IsGA success (defined as a ≥2-grade improvement in IsGA from baseline
12 months
changes in DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index ) questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
DLQI is a ten-question questionnaire used to measure the impact of skin disease on the quality of life of an affected person. It is de-signed for people aged 16 years and above.
12 months
exacerbations of atopic dermatitis
Time Frame: 12 months
number of exacerbations of atopic dermatitis per year of observation. Definition:in terms of the need to use systemic steroids.
12 months
changes in serum concentration of IgG4 against D. pteronyssinus
Time Frame: 12 months
assessment of allergen-specific IgG4 concentration in blood serum after 6 and 12 months of treatment in arms with the addition of sublingual immunotherapy SLIT-HDM (AU/L)
12 months
changes in serum concentration of IgE against D. pteronyssinus
Time Frame: 12 months
assessment of allergen-specific IgE concentration in blood serum after 6 and 12 months of treatment in arms with the addition of sublingual immunotherapy SLIT-HDM (kU/L)
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrzej Bozek, Prof, Medical University of Silesia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atopic Dermatitis

Clinical Trials on tablets Acarizax

Subscribe