Simplified Papilla Preservation Flap(SPPF) and Enamel Matrix Derivative(EMD) With or Without Connective Tissue(CTG) Wall for the Treatment of Non Contained Infrabony Defects. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trail

Research is to compare and evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the enamel matrix derivative with or without connective tissue wall graft for noncontained infrabony defects using simplified papilla preservation technique .

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Research is to compare and evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the enamel matrix derivative with or without connective tissue wall graft for noncontained infrabony defects using simplified papilla preservation technique .The objectives is to assess the probing pocket depth reduction, clinical attachment level gain,gingival recession depth and radiographic bone gain. The TEST group will be treated withSIMPLIFIED PAPILLA PRESERVATION flap with connective tissue graft and enamel matrix derivative and the CONTROL group will be treated with SIMPLIFIED APILLA PRESERVATION flap and enamel matrix derivative. The total number of participants included will be 30 (Control-15; Study-15) with a 6 month follow up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Head of the department and professor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients willing to participate in the study.
  • Participants aged ≥18 years to 55 years.
  • Presented with non contained infra bony defects.
  • Presence of at least 1 non contained infra bony defect(IBD) with a pocket probing depth ≥6mm after reevaluation of the hygienic phase and a depth of IBD ≥3mm as detected on radiographs, with radiographic angulation of ≥37⸰ , and exhibiting a 1 or 2 wall infra bony defect15(assessed by a bone sounding and confirmed intrasurgically)
  • Patient's full mouth plaque score and bleeding score <20% at the time of surgical procedure.
  • No history of periodontal surgery at the experimental site.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Grade III mobility, endodontically treated teeth.
  • Pregnant and lactating females.
  • History of tobacco smoking .
  • Patients with systemic disease.
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to EMD.
  • Presence of pulpal and peri apical involvement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: control group
Simplified papilla preservation flap with enamel matrix derivative will be performed
connective tissue graft and Enamel matrix derivative in the defect area
Other Names:
  • Connective tissue graft technique
Experimental: Test group
Simplified papilla preservation flap with connective tissue graft and enamel matrix derivative will be performed
connective tissue graft and Enamel matrix derivative in the defect area
Other Names:
  • Connective tissue graft technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
clinical attachment gain
Time Frame: 6 months
change in attachment level for patient with isolated 2 or 3 wall defect treated with enamel matrix derivative and connective tissue wall graft in 1,3 and 6 months follow up
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pocket probing depth
Time Frame: 6 months
change in pocket probing depth from baseline to 1,3 and 6 months
6 months
radiographic bone gain
Time Frame: 6 months
change in radiographic bone level from baseline to 1,3,6 months
6 months
recession reduction
Time Frame: 6 months
change in recession from baseline to 1,3 and 6 months
6 months
plaque index
Time Frame: 6 months
change in plaque index from baseline to 1,3 and 6 months
6 months
gingival index
Time Frame: 6 months
change in calculus index from baseline to 1,3 and 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 02_D012_147502

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intrabony Periodontal Defect

Clinical Trials on Enamel matrix derivative

Subscribe