The Influence of Citric Acid Bone Surface Etching and Bone Defect Fill on GCF BMP-2 Release Profile

December 6, 2018 updated by: Moustafa Mukhtar, Ain Shams University

The Influence of Citric Acid Bone Surface Etching and Bone Substitute Intra-osseous Defect Fill on Crevicular Fluid BMP-2 Release Profile (Randomized Clinical Trial)

This study evaluates the effect of citric acid on bone surface of infrabony defects when used for 30 seconds at ph 1 and 50% concentration before the application of bovine derived xenograft to fill the defect, Bone Morphogenic protein 2 (BMP-2) marker was evaluated in 5 different days during the first month after surgery and clinical and radiographic parameters were reassessed after 6 months

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Citric acid have been widely used to treat root surfaces of periodontally affected teeth in order to render it biologically suitable for fibroblast reattachment. however, systematic reviews showed no clinical significance when it was used as a root surface conditioner. Recently it was found in experimental studies that when citric acid was used on bone surface for a brief period, it increased bone formation and improved consolidation of grafted bone to bone bed. In this study infrabony defects were treated with citric acid PH 1 and 50% concentration for 30 seconds before washing it off and then application of bovine derived xenograft was done to fill the defect. BMP-2 marker was evaluated at days 1,3,7,14 and 30 by taking a sample using perio-paper from the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and clinical and radiographic parameters were taken after 6 months of follow-up

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Both genders aged between 32-60 years.
  • Selected patient with a single site of:

    1. Two walled or three walled infra-bony defect.
    2. The bone defect should be at least 3 mm in depth from the crest of the alveolar bone to the base of the defect.
    3. Pocket depth of more than or equal to 5 mm.
    4. Clinical attachment loss equal or more than 3mm
  • Patients ready to comply with oral hygiene measures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any systemic disease that contra-indicates periodontal surgery or may affect healing.
  • Smokers
  • Pregnant females
  • Drug abusers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Citric acid
Citric acid PH1 and concentration 50% was used for 30 seconds on bone surface before washing it off and filling the defect with xenograft
Citric acid ph1, 50% concentration solution
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control
Control test
Control group, xenograft was used to fill infrabony defects without treating bone surface
Other Names:
  • Control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone Morphogenic protein 2
Time Frame: 1 day
The level of Bone morphogenic protein 2 was measured in the gingival crevicular fluid using a perio-paper then the marker level was determined using an Enzyme linked immunosorbent kit (ELISA kit)
1 day
Bone Morphogenic protein 2
Time Frame: 3 days
The level of Bone morphogenic protein 2 was measured in the gingival crevicular fluid using a perio-paper then the marker level was determined using an Enzyme linked immunosorbent kit (ELISA kit)
3 days
Bone Morphogenic protein 2
Time Frame: 7 days
The level of Bone morphogenic protein 2 was measured in the gingival crevicular fluid using a perio-paper then the marker level was determined using an Enzyme linked immunosorbent kit (ELISA kit)
7 days
Bone Morphogenic protein 2
Time Frame: 14 days
The level of Bone morphogenic protein 2 was measured in the gingival crevicular fluid using a perio-paper then the marker level was determined using an Enzyme linked immunosorbent kit (ELISA kit)
14 days
Bone Morphogenic protein 2
Time Frame: 30 days
The level of Bone morphogenic protein 2 was measured in the gingival crevicular fluid using a perio-paper then the marker level was determined using an Enzyme linked immunosorbent kit (ELISA kit)
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gingival Index
Time Frame: 6 months
Estimation of the degree of gingival inflammation was done according to Loe where scores were given between 0-3 (0=no inflammation and 3=severe inflammation)
6 months
Plaque index
Time Frame: 6 months
Estimation of the amount of dental plaque according to Silness & Loe where scores were given between 0-3 (0=no plaque and 3=presence of abundant plaque)
6 months
Probing depth
Time Frame: 6 months
Estimation was done by measuring the depth from the gingival margin to the base of the periodontal pocket using a UNC-15 periodontal probe
6 months
Clinical attachment level
Time Frame: 6 months
Estimation was done by measuring the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the base of the pocket using a UNC-15 periodontal probe
6 months
Radiographic bone fill
Time Frame: 6 months
Estimation was done by taking a linear measurement using RVG system from the baseline defect till the alveolar bone crest
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intrabony Periodontal Defect

Clinical Trials on Citric acid

3
Subscribe