Root Coverage in Smokers With Acellular Dermal Matrix Graft and Enamel Matrix Derivative

May 9, 2014 updated by: Arthur Belem Novaes Jr, University of Sao Paulo

A 12-month Randomised Controlled Prospective Clinical Study for Root Coverage in Smokers With Acellular Dermal Matrix Graft and Enamel Matrix Derivative

Smoking has a negative effect on the predictability and stability of root coverage procedures because of decreased blood supply and fibroblast activity. Long-term evaluation of this procedure in smokers is important for clinical decision making, because it provides information about the stability of results over time. In smokers, enamel matrix derivative (EMD) used at acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG)/ soft tissue interface could be an alternative to improve the deficient healing potential, since EMD has the capability of stimulating angiogenesis. At the ADMG/ root surface interface, it could improve the deficient fibroblast activity in smokers and therefore reduce the presence of a long junctional epithelium. The aim of this randomised controlled clinical study was to investigate whether EMD contributes to the root coverage of gingival recessions performed with ADMG in smokers during a 12-month follow-up.

Twenty smokers with bilateral Miller Class I or II gingival recessions ≥ 3 mm will be selected. The test group will be treated with an association of ADMG and EMD, and the control group with ADMG alone. Some clinical parameters as: probing depth, relative clinical attachment level, gingival recession height, gingival recession width, keratinized tissue width and keratinized tissue thickness will be evaluated before surgery and after twelve months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The present clinical study was designed as a controlled, randomised split-mouth design. Twenty patients will be selected by an experienced periodontist responsible for the study at the Clinic of Periodontology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto - University of São Paulo (USP). The subjects should have bilateral large, Miller (1985) Class I or II, ≥ 3 mm maxillary or mandibular gingival recession in non-molar teeth of different quadrants and in the same dental arch. Radiographs will take to evaluate the interproximal alveolar bone level.

Before beginning the active therapy, each patient will be randomised to a single treatment group (test or control) by using the method of randomly allocating by simple draw to reduce bias and equalize groups. The allocation was implemented by a senior investigator who will be not directly involved in the examination or treatment procedures. Using a split-mouth design, twenty patients with a total of 40 class I or II recession defects will be randomly allotted and treated either with acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG) + enamel matrix derivative (EMD) (test group - TG) and the other side received only ADMG (control group - CG).

The clinical parameters will be recorded at the selected and adjacent teeth, on both sides, with computerized periodontal probe two weeks after basic periodontal therapy (baseline) and twelve months after surgery by one-blinded experienced periodontist. A calibration exercise will be performed to achieve acceptable intraexaminer reproducibility (≥ 90%).

The patients initially will complete a pre-surgical therapy - a program of plaque control was performed before and after surgery and scaling and root planning with curettes. The plaque and bleeding indices should be less than 20% at baseline. All risks and benefits involved in the surgical procedures will be explained to the patients before they signed a consent form in agreement. The methodology was approved by the Human Ethics Research Committee of the School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto - USP (process 2009.1.590.58.4/ 004.0.138.000-09).

A modified surgical technique will be used in both groups, the flap is extended to adjacent teeth as a modification of the current subepithelial connective tissue graft technique (Langer & Langer, 1985). In the test group, an additional EMD layer will be inserted between the ADMG and the flap, and between the ADMG and the root surface by using a sterile brush. The prescribed medication will include 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate solution to rinse twice a day for the first fifteen days, amoxicillin for seven days, starting 24 hours before surgery, and an analgesic for three days. Patients will continue to smoke as usual and will be instructed to avoid trauma and to discontinue tooth brushing at the surgical sites during fourteen days.

The sutures will be removed after fourteen days. The patients will be recalled for control and prophylaxis after two and four weeks and, subsequently, once a month until the final examination.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • São Paulo
      • Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, 14040-904
        • Department of Oral Surgery and Periodontology - Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • smokers (consuming 10 or more cigarettes/ day, for over five years)
  • The subjects should have bilateral large, Miller (1985) Class I or II, ≥ 3 mm maxillary or mandibular gingival recession in non-molar teeth of different quadrants and in the same dental arch.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any systemic condition
  • daily drug intake
  • periodontal pockets associated with the gingival recessions or adjacent teeth

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: acellular dermal matrix graft
On one side, the previously reflected partial-thickness flaps will be coronally positioned to entirely cover the acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG), and also sutured with sling sutures using 6-0 bioabsorbable sutures.
Other Names:
  • Alloderm
Experimental: enamel matrix derivative
On one side, the previously reflected partial-thickness flaps will be coronally positioned to entirely cover the acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG), and also sutured with sling sutures using 6-0 bioabsorbable sutures.
Other Names:
  • Alloderm
On the other side, the same procedure will be performed, with an additional layer of enamel matrix derivative between the acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG) and the flap, and between the ADMG and the root surface by using a sterile brush.
Other Names:
  • Emdogain

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of root coverage
Time Frame: twelve months
twelve months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Probing depth
Time Frame: twelve months
twelve months
relative clinical attachment level
Time Frame: Twelve months
Twelve months
gingival recession height
Time Frame: Twelve months
Twelve months
gingival recession width
Time Frame: twelve months
twelve months
keratinized tissue width
Time Frame: twelve months
twelve months
keratinized tissue thickness
Time Frame: twelve months
twelve months
complete root coverage
Time Frame: twelve months
twelve months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Arthur B Novaes, Professor, Department of Oral Surgery and Periodontology - Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 12, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 12, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingival Recession

Clinical Trials on acellular dermal matrix graft

3
Subscribe