- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06533345
VCOM Pain Free Research Collaborative (MERCI)
MERCI Chronic Pain Research Clinic (Medical Education and Research in Compassionate Integration/Intervention)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Bill Pearson, PhD
- Phone Number: 334-442-4023
- Email: wpearson01@vcom.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Auburn, Alabama, United States, 36832
- Recruiting
- Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine-Auburn
-
Contact:
- Bill Pearson, PhD
- Phone Number: 334-442-4023
- Email: wpearson01@vcom.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Those experiencing chronic pain, i.e., ongoing pain not relevant to an acute perturbation (e.g., recent injury).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Those subjects seeking pharmaceutical intervention
- Those whose myofascial pain is deemed functional (normal response to acute injury or ongoing pathology
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment
|
Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: After inform and consent process, the subject will enter patient room and meet with Dr. Hayes, who will conduct a brief history of patient pain, injuries, and procedures.
Subjects will be asked to wear, or change into, athletic shorts or a tank top or loose-fitting T-shirt to facilitate treatment.
Subject will undergo a brief somatic dysfunction screen, which involves light tough and manipulation.
Once Hayes has diagnosed potential dysfunctions, he will proceed with osteopathic manipulative treatment.
Treatment will last anywhere from 15 minutes to 1 hour.
At the end of the treatment, subjects will be scheduled for a follow-up visit.
|
|
Experimental: Dry Needling
|
An initial history to document a chief complaint relevant to pain is conducted and to identify and potential contraindications (infection of overlying skin, patient on anticoagulation drugs, 1st trimester of pregnancy, etc.) A physical exam is performed to identify the trigger points causing pain.
The subject is educated about the risks/benefits/indications and alternative treatments.
The subject is also educated about dry needling aftercare.
The skin over the trigger points is cleaned with 70% isopropyl alcohol.
The pertinent trigger points are treated with dry needling (95% of time), direct inhibition (2 - 3% of time) or injection of 1% lidocaine in a fan-like fashion (1 - 2 % of the time).
Subject is assessed for any bleeding.
An office note, including a procedure note, is documented in the subject's record.
Subject is scheduled for additional follow-up meeting.
|
|
Experimental: Autonomic Recalibration
|
Participant will be outfitted with the Empatica wrist sensor.
An initial history to rule out pathology and document a chief complaint relevant to pain is conducted.
An initial head to toe assessment of withdrawal or startle reflex behavior in response to palpation is performed to identify trigger points and establish patterns of sympathetic dominance.
The pattern of sympathetic dominance is addressed during treatment by Primal Reflex Release Technique Protocol to inhibit somatic afferent feedback loops and rebalance the autonomic nervous system towards a state of parasympathetic dominance.
Day 2 is the same until the initial history and r/o.
Here, the history is from the previous day, asking about perception of pain, sleep, digestion, or other pertinent issues brought up on the first visit.
Treatment proceeds same as Day 1.
Any emotional tags to trigger points are identified and acknowledged.
Subjects may be scheduled for follow-up visits if their pain persists.
|
|
Experimental: Nutrition
|
Nutrition: The nutrition intervention will be conducted as a 12-week protocol with assessment points at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months.
Following consent, eligible participants will work through a self-taught educational module detailing the anti-inflammatory dietary program.
Once the module is completed, participants will be scheduled for one-on-one counseling sessions with a Registered Dietitian or a supervised Dietetic Intern or Medical Student on the research team to receive personalized guidance on implementation of the dietary intervention.
A dietary recall will be conducted via the automated self-administered dietary assessment tool (ASA24®), which takes about 20 minutes to complete.
This survey will be conducted on two non-consecutive days at each timepoint (baseline, 1 month, and 3 months).
|
|
Experimental: Behavior Change Coaching
|
Done by Dr. Hollingsworth or students via consultations with participants.
Participant's health behavior aspirations or target outcomes will be clarified, informed by the participant's interactions with other MERCI providers.
Behaviors that move the participant towards their aspirations/outcomes will be explored to find target behaviors that the participant is motivated and able to do.
Target behaviors and supporting habits will be designed into the participant's existing routine.
The Fogg Behavior Model will be used 1) to find the participant's primary motivation for engaging in target behaviors and 2) to make target behaviors easier to do.
Implementation intentions - When/then or If/then plans - will be used to form habits and promote behavior engagement.
Adopting a growth mindset will also be discussed.
Subsequent consultations will focus on troubleshooting, iterative improvements, and incorporation of new aspirations/outcomes, target behaviors, and supporting habits.
|
|
Experimental: Counseling Psychology
|
Psychoeducation Workshop and Counseling: The psychoeducational group intervention will be done according to the standardized Empowered Relief (Darnall et al., 2024) protocol.
Empowered Relief is a single-session, 2-hour group workshop (online or in person) that teaches participants pain neuroscience education, mindfulness principles, and cognitive-behavioral skills.
During the program, participants will complete a personalized plan to work toward pain relief.
This program requires a certified instructor; Marilyn Cornish (Co-I), a licensed psychologist, is certified.
After completion, participants can attend up to 4 individual counseling sessions with a counseling psychology doctoral student (supervised by Marilyn Cornish).
Sessions will be approximately 50-60 minutes and will occur every other week.
Specific in-session interventions will be tailored to the participant's unique needs but will focus on participants' pain relief plan and overall psychological wellbeing of participants.
|
|
Experimental: Multiple
|
Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: After inform and consent process, the subject will enter patient room and meet with Dr. Hayes, who will conduct a brief history of patient pain, injuries, and procedures.
Subjects will be asked to wear, or change into, athletic shorts or a tank top or loose-fitting T-shirt to facilitate treatment.
Subject will undergo a brief somatic dysfunction screen, which involves light tough and manipulation.
Once Hayes has diagnosed potential dysfunctions, he will proceed with osteopathic manipulative treatment.
Treatment will last anywhere from 15 minutes to 1 hour.
At the end of the treatment, subjects will be scheduled for a follow-up visit.
An initial history to document a chief complaint relevant to pain is conducted and to identify and potential contraindications (infection of overlying skin, patient on anticoagulation drugs, 1st trimester of pregnancy, etc.) A physical exam is performed to identify the trigger points causing pain.
The subject is educated about the risks/benefits/indications and alternative treatments.
The subject is also educated about dry needling aftercare.
The skin over the trigger points is cleaned with 70% isopropyl alcohol.
The pertinent trigger points are treated with dry needling (95% of time), direct inhibition (2 - 3% of time) or injection of 1% lidocaine in a fan-like fashion (1 - 2 % of the time).
Subject is assessed for any bleeding.
An office note, including a procedure note, is documented in the subject's record.
Subject is scheduled for additional follow-up meeting.
Nutrition: The nutrition intervention will be conducted as a 12-week protocol with assessment points at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months.
Following consent, eligible participants will work through a self-taught educational module detailing the anti-inflammatory dietary program.
Once the module is completed, participants will be scheduled for one-on-one counseling sessions with a Registered Dietitian or a supervised Dietetic Intern or Medical Student on the research team to receive personalized guidance on implementation of the dietary intervention.
A dietary recall will be conducted via the automated self-administered dietary assessment tool (ASA24®), which takes about 20 minutes to complete.
This survey will be conducted on two non-consecutive days at each timepoint (baseline, 1 month, and 3 months).
Done by Dr. Hollingsworth or students via consultations with participants.
Participant's health behavior aspirations or target outcomes will be clarified, informed by the participant's interactions with other MERCI providers.
Behaviors that move the participant towards their aspirations/outcomes will be explored to find target behaviors that the participant is motivated and able to do.
Target behaviors and supporting habits will be designed into the participant's existing routine.
The Fogg Behavior Model will be used 1) to find the participant's primary motivation for engaging in target behaviors and 2) to make target behaviors easier to do.
Implementation intentions - When/then or If/then plans - will be used to form habits and promote behavior engagement.
Adopting a growth mindset will also be discussed.
Subsequent consultations will focus on troubleshooting, iterative improvements, and incorporation of new aspirations/outcomes, target behaviors, and supporting habits.
Subjects receiving multiple treatment interventions over the same period of time. Example: A subject joins the Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment group and meets with Dr. Hayes for treatment visits. At the same time, they are meeting with Dr. Kirby in a separate visit (or at the same time, if scheduling allows) to discuss Nutrition. Any subjects who were in multiple/overlapping treatment groups will fit this description.
Participant will be outfitted with the Empatica wrist sensor.
An initial history to rule out pathology and document a chief complaint relevant to pain is conducted.
An initial head to toe assessment of withdrawal or startle reflex behavior in response to palpation is performed to identify trigger points and establish patterns of sympathetic dominance.
The pattern of sympathetic dominance is addressed during treatment by Primal Reflex Release Technique Protocol to inhibit somatic afferent feedback loops and rebalance the autonomic nervous system towards a state of parasympathetic dominance.
Day 2 is the same until the initial history and r/o.
Here, the history is from the previous day, asking about perception of pain, sleep, digestion, or other pertinent issues brought up on the first visit.
Treatment proceeds same as Day 1.
Any emotional tags to trigger points are identified and acknowledged.
Subjects may be scheduled for follow-up visits if their pain persists.
Psychoeducation Workshop and Counseling: The psychoeducational group intervention will be done according to the standardized Empowered Relief (Darnall et al., 2024) protocol.
Empowered Relief is a single-session, 2-hour group workshop (online or in person) that teaches participants pain neuroscience education, mindfulness principles, and cognitive-behavioral skills.
During the program, participants will complete a personalized plan to work toward pain relief.
This program requires a certified instructor; Marilyn Cornish (Co-I), a licensed psychologist, is certified.
After completion, participants can attend up to 4 individual counseling sessions with a counseling psychology doctoral student (supervised by Marilyn Cornish).
Sessions will be approximately 50-60 minutes and will occur every other week.
Specific in-session interventions will be tailored to the participant's unique needs but will focus on participants' pain relief plan and overall psychological wellbeing of participants.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Intensity (NRS Pain Scale)
Time Frame: Beginning of each Visit through study completion, an average (anticipated) of 6 months
|
0-10 Pain Rating.
0=no pain to 10=pain as intense as you can imagine
|
Beginning of each Visit through study completion, an average (anticipated) of 6 months
|
|
PROMIS (Pain Interference, SF4a)
Time Frame: Beginning of each Visit through study completion, an average (anticipated) of 6 months
|
Pain interference survey.
Answers range from "Not at all" to "Very Much" when relating to the impact of pain on daily life.
|
Beginning of each Visit through study completion, an average (anticipated) of 6 months
|
|
Use of analgesics (QAQ-Quantitative Analgesic Questionnaire)
Time Frame: Beginning of each Visit through study completion, an average (anticipated) of 6 months
|
Survey listing all medications taken for pain.
All types are converted in equivalent doses of morphine and scored.
|
Beginning of each Visit through study completion, an average (anticipated) of 6 months
|
|
Human Flourishing (Secure Flourishing Index)
Time Frame: Beginning of each Visit through study completion, an average (anticipated) of 6 months
|
Measure of Human Flourishing across 6 Domains.
Scores range from 0-10 with lower scores indicating lower flourishing and higher scores indicating higher flourishing.
|
Beginning of each Visit through study completion, an average (anticipated) of 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
- Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
- Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, Williamson DF, Spitz AM, Edwards V, Koss MP, Marks JS. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med. 1998 May;14(4):245-58. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00017-8.
- Evans C, Connell J, Barkham M, Margison F, McGrath G, Mellor-Clark J, Audin K. Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;180:51-60. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.1.51.
- Amtmann D, Cook KF, Jensen MP, Chen WH, Choi S, Revicki D, Cella D, Rothrock N, Keefe F, Callahan L, Lai JS. Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain. 2010 Jul;150(1):173-182. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.025.
- Edwards LC, Pearce SA, Turner-Stokes L, Jones A. The Pain Beliefs Questionnaire: an investigation of beliefs in the causes and consequences of pain. Pain. 1992 Dec;51(3):267-272. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90209-T.
- Robinson-Papp J, George MC, Wongmek A, Nmashie A, Merlin JS, Ali Y, Epstein L, Green M, Serban S, Sheth P, Simpson DM. The Quantitative Analgesic Questionnaire: A Tool to Capture Patient-Reported Chronic Pain Medication Use. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Sep;50(3):381-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.03.013. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
- Asmundson GJ, Katz J. Understanding the co-occurrence of anxiety disorders and chronic pain: state-of-the-art. Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(10):888-901. doi: 10.1002/da.20600.
- Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 7(4), 524-532. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524
- Cohen SP, Vase L, Hooten WM. Chronic pain: an update on burden, best practices, and new advances. Lancet. 2021 May 29;397(10289):2082-2097. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00393-7.
- Kuntz JL, Young DR, Saelens BE, Frank LD, Meenan RT, Dickerson JF, Keast EM, Fortmann SP. Validity of the Exercise Vital Sign Tool to Assess Physical Activity. Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jun;60(6):866-872. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.012. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
- Barkham, Michael, Bewick, Bridgette, Mullin, Tracy, Gilbody, Simon, Connell, Janice, Cahill, Jane, Mellor-Clark, John, Richards, David, Unsworth, Gisela, Evans, Chris, (2013), The CORE-10: A short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 13 doi: 10.1080/14733145.2012.729069.
- Hooper, L. M., Stockton, P., Krupnick, J., & Green, B. L. (2011). The development, use, and psychometric properties of the Trauma History Questionnaire. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 16, 258-283.
- Jensen, Mark P., Hypnosis for Chronic Pain Management: Therapist Guide, Treatments That Work (New York, 2011; online edn, Oxford Academic, 1 Apr. 2015), https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780199772377.001.0001, accessed 12 Mar. 2024.
- Vartiainen P, Heiskanen T, Sintonen H, Roine RP, Kalso E. Health-related quality of life change in patients treated at a multidisciplinary pain clinic. Eur J Pain. 2019 Aug;23(7):1318-1328. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1398. Epub 2019 May 3.
- Kress HG, Aldington D, Alon E, Coaccioli S, Collett B, Coluzzi F, Huygen F, Jaksch W, Kalso E, Kocot-Kepska M, Mangas AC, Ferri CM, Mavrocordatos P, Morlion B, Muller-Schwefe G, Nicolaou A, Hernandez CP, Sichere P. A holistic approach to chronic pain management that involves all stakeholders: change is needed. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(9):1743-54. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1072088. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
- Seton B, Pandey R, Piscura MK, Pearson WG Jr. Autonomic Recalibration: A Promising Approach for Alleviating Myofascial Pain Explored in a Retrospective Case Series. Cureus. 2024 Jan 17;16(1):e52450. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52450. eCollection 2024 Jan.
- Charles D, Hudgins T, MacNaughton J, Newman E, Tan J, Wigger M. A systematic review of manual therapy techniques, dry cupping and dry needling in the reduction of myofascial pain and myofascial trigger points. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Jul;23(3):539-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
- Clar C, Tsertsvadze A, Court R, Hundt GL, Clarke A, Sutcliffe P. Clinical effectiveness of manual therapy for the management of musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal conditions: systematic review and update of UK evidence report. Chiropr Man Therap. 2014 Mar 28;22(1):12. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-22-12.
- Mejia-Mejia E, Budidha K, Abay TY, May JM, Kyriacou PA. Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and Pulse Rate Variability (PRV) for the Assessment of Autonomic Responses. Front Physiol. 2020 Jul 23;11:779. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00779. eCollection 2020.
- Darnall BD, Burns JW, Hong J, Roy A, Slater K, Poupore-King H, Ziadni MS, You DS, Jung C, Cook KF, Lorig K, Tian L, Mackey SC. Empowered Relief, cognitive behavioral therapy, and health education for people with chronic pain: a comparison of outcomes at 6-month Follow-up for a randomized controlled trial. Pain Rep. 2024 Jan 25;9(1):e1116. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001116. eCollection 2024 Jan.
- Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR and Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: development and validation. Psychological assessment. 1995;7(4):524-532
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Nervous System Diseases
- Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Chronic Pain
- Wounds and Injuries
- Primary Dysautonomias
- Therapeutics
- Complementary Therapies
- Physical Therapy Modalities
- Diet, Food, and Nutrition
- Physiological Phenomena
- Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
- Population Characteristics
- Rehabilitation
- Health Status
- Demography
- Musculoskeletal Manipulations
- Nutritional Status
- Dry Needling
- Manipulation, Osteopathic
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024--061
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain
-
University Rovira i VirgiliMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación, SpainNot yet recruitingChronic Post-operative Pain | Chronic Postsurgical Pain | Chronic Post-surgical Pain | Chronic Postoperative PainSpain
-
Pain ConcernThe Thistle Foundation; Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland (the ALLIANCE) and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Chronic Pain, Widespread | Chronic Pain Due to Trauma | Chronic Pain Due to Malignancy (Finding) | Chronic Pain Due to Injury | Chronic Pain Post-Procedural | Chronic Pain HipUnited Kingdom
-
Washington D.C. Veterans Affairs Medical CenterRecruitingChronic Back Pain | Chronic Pain (back / Neck)United States
-
Bjorn AngKarolinska Institutet; The Swedish Research Council; Göteborg University; Forte; Dalarna...Not yet recruitingPain Management | Pain, Chronic | Chronic Pain, WidespreadSweden
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...RecruitingJoint Pain | Chronic Knee Pain | Chronic Pain (Back / Neck) | Chronic Pain ManagementUnited States
-
University of Alabama, TuscaloosaPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; East Carolina University; Whatley...CompletedPain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Widespread Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Due to InjuryUnited States
-
University of FaisalabadNot yet recruiting
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Chronic Neck PainUnited States
-
Universidade do Vale do ParaíbaCAPES Foundation - Ministry of Education, Brazil.Enrolling by invitationChronic Low Back Pain | Chronic Shoulder Pain | Chronic Knee PainBrazil
Clinical Trials on Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment
-
Ecole d'ostéopathie de ParisUniversity of Paris 5 - Rene DescartesCompleted
-
Nantes University HospitalCompletedBreast Feeding, ExclusiveFrance
-
Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, New YorkUnknownHeadacheUnited States
-
New York Institute of TechnologyCompletedDistorted; Balance | Post-Concussion SymptomsUnited States
-
New York Institute of TechnologyRecruitingParkinson's Disease | ConstipationUnited States
-
Come CollaborationUniversity of ChietiCompleted
-
New York Institute of TechnologyWithdrawn
-
University of California, San DiegoEnrolling by invitation
-
Des Moines UniversityCompletedOsteopathy in Diseases Classified ElsewhereUnited States