- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06533397
The Application of a Biphasic Calcium Sulfate Graft Material in Sinus Floor Elevation
Pneumatization of the maxillary sinus may lead to insufficient bone volume for dental implant placement in the edentulous posterior maxilla. Sinus floor elevation (SFE) surgery with the lateral window technique is a safe and predictable surgical intervention to restore bone height in the maxillary premolar and molar areas. According to the literature, several bone graft materials may be successfully applied for SFE surgery. There is a lack of evidence regarding the application of biphasic calcium sulfate (BCS) for SFE. The healing period following staged SFE is 2-9 months.
The aim of this study is:
- to evaluate the success of SFE surgery using BCS as graft material,
- to compare the microarchitecture of the augmented bone depending on the healing period,
- to evaluate the success of dental implants placed in the augmented bone and that of the prostheses delivered on the dental implants.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Márton Kivovics, DMD,MSD,PHD
- Phone Number: 60732 003614591500
- Email: kivovics.marton@semmelweis.hu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Dorottya Pénzes, DMD,MSD,PHD
- Phone Number: 60759 003614591500
- Email: dorottya.penzes@semmelweis.hu
Study Locations
-
-
Budapest
-
Budapest, Budapest, Hungary, 1088
- Recruiting
- Semmelweis University Department of Public Dental Health
-
Contact:
- Márton Kivovics, DMD MSc PhD
- Phone Number: 60732 003614591500
- Email: kivovics.marton@semmelweis.hu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients over the age of 18 years,
- Patients who need dental implant-borne prostheses,
- Patients with insufficient bone height in the posterior maxilla due to sinus pneumatization.
Exclusion criteria:
.• Patients who had major systemic diseases as classified by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA grades III-IV),
- psychiatric contraindications,
- patients on medication interfering with bone metabolism, including steroid therapy and antiresorptive medication,
- radiation to the head or neck region within the previous five years,
- localized periapical disease, odontogenic and nonodontogenic cysts, and maxillary sinusitis,
- evidence of uncontrolled periodontal disease,
- Alcohol Use Disorder defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5),
- recreational drug abuse,
- heavy smoking (>10 cigarettes/day),
- diseases of the oral mucosa, including blisters and ulcers, i.e.: red and white lesions, pigmented lesions, benign tumors of the oral cavity, and oral cancer. Leukoplakia, Erythroplakia, Precancerous lesions, Oral squamous cell carcinoma and malign tumors of the soft and hard tissues, Oral candidiasis, Oral lichen planus, Psoriasis, Pemphigus, and Pemphigoid.
- pregnancy or nursing,
- poor oral hygiene
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 3-month healing period
Staged SFE is performed; following a 3-month-long healing period, bone core biopsy samples are harvested from the augmented bone, and dental implants are placed.
|
Patients rinse with 0.2% chlorhexidine solution for one minute before surgery.
Under local anesthesia, a mucoperiosteal flap is raised from a midcrestal incision and two relieving incisions.
Lateral window osteotomies are carried out using diamond burs.
The Schneiderian membrane is carefully elevated and the synthetic bone graft material (Bond Apatite, Augma Biomaterials, Cesarea, Israel) (2-3 cm3) is packed in the defect with light force.
The buccal flap is then mobilized to allow tension-free primary closure.
The margins are stabilized with single interrupted sutures.
Antibiotics (1 g amoxicillin-clavulanate twice a day for 5 days, or in case of side effects or known allergy to penicillin, 300 mg clindamycin 4 times a day for 4 days), anti-inflammatory drugs (50 mg diclofenac 3 times a day for 3 days), and chlorhexidine mouthwash (twice a day for 21 days from the first day after surgery) are prescribed.
Suture removal takes place after 10 days.
Other Names:
A CBCT scan is performed before SFE surgery to evaluate the anatomy and pathologies of the maxillary sinus.
A CBCT scan is performed following the 3- or 6-month-long healing period after SFE to evaluate the anatomy and healing of the augmented bone and the maxillary sinus.
At the time of dental implant placement, the first step of the implant bed preparation is performed using a trephine drill to harvest a bone core biopsy sample from the augmented bone.
The biopsy sample is harvested from the implant bed, this way the patient is spared of excess surgical burden as this bone would be removed even if no biopsy sample was harvested during dental implant placement.
The bone core biopsy samples are subjected to histomorphometric and microCT analysis.
Following the 3- or 6-month-long healing period following SFE, dental implants are placed non-submerged in the augmented bone under local anesthesia.
3 months after dental implant placement, fixed dental prostheses are delivered on the dental implants.
A synthetic bone graft material (Bond Apatite, Augma Biomaterials, Cesarea, Israel) is used during SFE.
|
|
Experimental: 6-month healing period
Staged SFE is performed; following a 6-month-long healing period, bone core biopsy samples are harvested from the augmented bone, and dental implants are placed.
|
Patients rinse with 0.2% chlorhexidine solution for one minute before surgery.
Under local anesthesia, a mucoperiosteal flap is raised from a midcrestal incision and two relieving incisions.
Lateral window osteotomies are carried out using diamond burs.
The Schneiderian membrane is carefully elevated and the synthetic bone graft material (Bond Apatite, Augma Biomaterials, Cesarea, Israel) (2-3 cm3) is packed in the defect with light force.
The buccal flap is then mobilized to allow tension-free primary closure.
The margins are stabilized with single interrupted sutures.
Antibiotics (1 g amoxicillin-clavulanate twice a day for 5 days, or in case of side effects or known allergy to penicillin, 300 mg clindamycin 4 times a day for 4 days), anti-inflammatory drugs (50 mg diclofenac 3 times a day for 3 days), and chlorhexidine mouthwash (twice a day for 21 days from the first day after surgery) are prescribed.
Suture removal takes place after 10 days.
Other Names:
A CBCT scan is performed before SFE surgery to evaluate the anatomy and pathologies of the maxillary sinus.
A CBCT scan is performed following the 3- or 6-month-long healing period after SFE to evaluate the anatomy and healing of the augmented bone and the maxillary sinus.
At the time of dental implant placement, the first step of the implant bed preparation is performed using a trephine drill to harvest a bone core biopsy sample from the augmented bone.
The biopsy sample is harvested from the implant bed, this way the patient is spared of excess surgical burden as this bone would be removed even if no biopsy sample was harvested during dental implant placement.
The bone core biopsy samples are subjected to histomorphometric and microCT analysis.
Following the 3- or 6-month-long healing period following SFE, dental implants are placed non-submerged in the augmented bone under local anesthesia.
3 months after dental implant placement, fixed dental prostheses are delivered on the dental implants.
A synthetic bone graft material (Bond Apatite, Augma Biomaterials, Cesarea, Israel) is used during SFE.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Success of the SFE
Time Frame: 3 or 6 months
|
The SFE surgery is successful if no inflammatory complications occur in the 3- or 6-month-long healing period and the bone volume is sufficient for dental implant placement.
|
3 or 6 months
|
|
Success of the dental implants
Time Frame: 5 years
|
According to The International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Success (optimum health)
II. Satisfactory survival
III. Compromised survival
IV. Failure (clinical or absolute failure) Any of the following:
|
5 years
|
|
Success of the implant borne prostheses
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Prostheses with four or fewer complications (screw loosening, decementation, chipping) that could be treated chairside.
|
5 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hisomorphometry: Percent of residual bone graft particles
Time Frame: 3-6 months
|
The percentage of residual bone graft particle-area measured on the representative sections prepared from the bone core biopsy samples.
Unit: percent (%)
|
3-6 months
|
|
Hisomorphometry: Percent of newly formed bone
Time Frame: 3-6 months
|
The percentage of newly formed bone-area measured on the representative sections prepared from the bone core biopsy samples.
Unit: percent (%)
|
3-6 months
|
|
Hisomorphometry: Percent of bone marrow
Time Frame: 3-6 months
|
The percentage of bone marrow-area measured on the representative sections prepared from the bone core biopsy samples.
Unit: percent (%)
|
3-6 months
|
|
Value of the percent bone volume (BV/TV) calculated from the microCT reconstructions of the bone core biopsy samples.
Time Frame: 3-6 months
|
Relative volume of calcified tissue in the selected volume.
Unit: none
|
3-6 months
|
|
Value of the bone surface to volume ratio (BS/TV), calculated from the microCT reconstructions of the bone core biopsy samples.
Time Frame: 3-6 months
|
Ratio of the segmented bone surface to the total volume in the region of interest.
Unit: 1/mm
|
3-6 months
|
|
Value of the trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.), calculated from the microCT reconstructions of the bone core biopsy samples.
Time Frame: 3-6 months
|
Mean thickness of the trabeculae, assessed using direct 3D methods.
Unit: mm
|
3-6 months
|
|
Value of the trabecular separation (Tb.Sp.), calculated from the microCT reconstructions of the bone core biopsy samples.
Time Frame: 3-6 months
|
Mean distance between the trabeculae, assessed using direct 3D methods.
Unit: mm
|
3-6 months
|
|
Value of the trabecular bone pattern factor (Tb.Pf), calculated from the microCT reconstructions of the bone core biopsy samples.
Time Frame: 3-6 months
|
Indicator of the relation between convex and concave elements in the trabecular bone structure.
Tb.Pf <0 when the trabecular bone is honeycomb-like and increases as the trabecular bone acquires a rod-like structure.
Unit: none
|
3-6 months
|
|
Value of the structure model index (SMI), calculated from the microCT reconstructions of the bone core biopsy samples.
Time Frame: 3-6 months
|
The estimator of the plate- versus rod-like characteristic of the trabecular bone structure, 0 for perfect plates, 3 for perfect rods, and 4 for perfect spheres.
Unit: none
|
3-6 months
|
|
Value of the Total porosity (Po(tot)), calculated from the microCT reconstructions of the bone core biopsy samples.
Time Frame: 3-6 months
|
Percent porosity is the volume of pores as a percent of the total volume of interest (VOI).
Unit: percent (%)
|
3-6 months
|
|
Value of the Connectivity (Conn.), calculated from the microCT reconstructions of the bone core biopsy samples.
Time Frame: 3-6 months
|
One useful and fast algorithm for calculating the Euler connectivity in 3D is the "Conneulor".
It measures what might be called "redundant connectivity", the degree to which parts of the object are multiply connected.
It is a measure of how many connections in a structure can be severed before the structure falls into two separate pieces.
Unit: none.
|
3-6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Márton Kivovics, DMD,MSD,PHD, Department of Public Dental Health, Semmelweis University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Bone Resorption
- Bone Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Periodontal Atrophy
- Periodontal Diseases
- Mouth Diseases
- Stomatognathic Diseases
- Alveolar Bone Loss
- Therapeutics
- Surgical Procedures, Operative
- Transplantation
- Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
- Biological Therapy
- Orthopedic Procedures
- Tissue Transplantation
- Dentistry
- Oral Surgical Procedures
- formycin diphosphate
- Bone Transplantation
- Sinus Floor Augmentation
Other Study ID Numbers
- SEDCD44
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Alveolar Bone Loss
-
Alexandria UniversityLehigh UniversityCompletedBone Loss | Horizontal Alveolar Bone Loss | Vertical Alveolar Bone LossEgypt
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical...Not yet recruitingAlveolar Bone Loss* / Therapy
-
Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande...KU Leuven; ITI International Team for Implantology, Switzerland; Rio Grande do...Not yet recruitingAlveolar Bone Loss | Bone Loss, Alveolar | Grafting Bone | Alveolar Bone Atrophy | Bone Loss, OsteoclasticBrazil
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingAlveolar Ridge Preservation | Autogenous Tooth Graft | Horizontal Alveolar Bone Loss | Vertical Alveolar Bone Loss | Delayed Implant
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical...Not yet recruitingPeriodontitis | Alveolar Bone Loss* / Therapy
-
Universidad de MurciaUnknownTooth Loss | Bone Loss, Alveolar | Bone Atrophy, AlveolarSpain
-
Cairo UniversityActive, not recruitingProsthesis | Bone Loss, Alveolar | Prosthodontics | Implants, DentalEgypt
-
Università degli Studi di FerraraAzienda USL FerraraActive, not recruitingBone Loss, Alveolar | Dehiscence | Alveolar Ridge EnlargementItaly
-
University of Science and Technology, YemenActive, not recruitingAlveolar Bone AtrophyYemen
-
University of TriesteInternational Piezosurgery AcademyCompletedBone Atrophy, Alveolar
Clinical Trials on Sinus floor elevation (SFE)
-
University of LiegeCompletedIntraoperative Outcomes | Postoperative Outcomes
-
Aalborg University HospitalActive, not recruitingDental Implant FailedDenmark
-
Universidad del Salvador, ArgentinaCompletedMaxillary Sinus AugmentationArgentina
-
Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityNot yet recruitingMaxillary Sinus Floor Elevation
-
Medical University of ViennaRecruitingAtrophy | Maxillary SinusAustria
-
Tufts UniversityCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
-
Studio Odontoiatrico Associato Dr. P. Cicchese...CompletedEdentulous Alveolar Ridge Atrophy | Edentulous; Alveolar Process, AtrophyItaly
-
Ahmed ZewailCompletedDental Implant | Lateral Sinus LiftingEgypt
-
International Piezosurgery AcademyUniversity of TristeCompletedAtrophy of Edentulous Maxillary Alveolar RidgeItaly