The Effect of Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Field on Stroke Patients

August 9, 2024 updated by: dr n. o zdr. Trzmiel Tomasz, Poznan University of Medical Sciences

The Effect of Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Field on Physical Fitness and Inflammatory Markers in Post-Stroke Patients

A stroke can cause neurological deficits resulting in decreased motor, sensory, and cognitive function, as well as a decline in psychosocial functioning. Early rehabilitation following a stroke incident is of great importance, and interventions should aim for an overall improvement in patient functioning and achieving the highest possible level of independence. In recent years, there has been an emphasis on the need to regulate the inflammation that occurs after a stroke, as it may influence the improvement or deterioration of the patient's condition. Initial studies have also indicated the potential for influencing post-stroke inflammation through physical therapy procedures. In studies on the impact of magnetotherapy on inflammatory processes in post-stroke patients, magnetotherapy is usually applied to the pelvic girdle or the head area. However, the effectiveness of these two application methods has not yet been compared. In this study, investigators aim to compare the effects of magnetotherapy applied to different body areas as a complement to neurological rehabilitation. The study aims to assess the impact of magnetotherapy as a complement to neurological rehabilitation on physical fitness and inflammatory markers in post-stroke patients, to evaluate the effect of magnetotherapy as a supplement to neurological rehabilitation on physical fitness and oxidative stress markers in post-stroke patients, and to assess the differences between the effects of magnetotherapy applied to the pelvic area versus magnetotherapy applied to the head area.

The participants will be divided into three groups: one will serve as the control group, while the other two will receive magnetotherapy to the head or the pelvis, respectively, as an addition to standard neurological therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

210

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Poznań, Poland
        • Recruiting
        • Neurorehabilitation Ward, Greater Poland Provincial Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 60 years
  • Ischemic stroke within a maximum of two weeks prior to admission to the ward

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe functional impairment (FIM score < 37)
  • History of previous strokes
  • Other neurological diseases or other conditions that could significantly impair the patient's functioning
  • Contraindications to magnetotherapy
  • Inability to establish logical verbal communication with the patient
  • Lack of informed consent to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MT1 - The group receiving magnetotherapy to the head in addition to standard therapy
  • In Group MT1, patients will undergo 10 sessions (over 10 consecutive days excluding weekends) of low-frequency magnetotherapy (exposure site - head, 40 Hz, 5 mT) as addition to standard neurological rehabilitation.
  • In Group MT2, patients will undergo 10 sessions (over 10 consecutive days excluding weekends) of low-frequency magnetotherapy (exposure site - pelvis, 40 Hz, 5 mT) as addition to standard neurological rehabilitation.
  • The control group participants will receive only neurological rehabilitation.
Active Comparator: MT2 - The group receiving magnetotherapy to the pelvis in addition to standard therapy
  • In Group MT1, patients will undergo 10 sessions (over 10 consecutive days excluding weekends) of low-frequency magnetotherapy (exposure site - head, 40 Hz, 5 mT) as addition to standard neurological rehabilitation.
  • In Group MT2, patients will undergo 10 sessions (over 10 consecutive days excluding weekends) of low-frequency magnetotherapy (exposure site - pelvis, 40 Hz, 5 mT) as addition to standard neurological rehabilitation.
  • The control group participants will receive only neurological rehabilitation.
No Intervention: Control group - The group receiving only standard therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Independence Measure
Time Frame: The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)
The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is a standardized tool used to assess a person's level of independence in performing daily activities, including self-care, mobility, and communication, with the results expressed in points.The total score for the FIM instrument will range between 18 and 126. he higher the score, the more independent the patient is.
The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)
Barthel Scale
Time Frame: The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)
The Barthel Scale is a standardized tool used to measure a person's ability to perform basic activities of daily living independently, such as feeding, bathing, dressing, and mobility, with the results expressed in points. The score can range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the highest level of patient independence.
The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)
Tinetti Scale
Time Frame: The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)

The Tinetti Scale is a standardized assessment tool used to evaluate a person's balance and gait, helping to determine their risk of falling, with the results expressed in points.

The Tinetti Scale is scored from 0 to 28 points, with lower scores indicating a higher risk of falls.

The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)
The Berg Balance Scale is a standardized tool used to assess a person's balance through various tasks, helping to evaluate their risk of falling, with the results expressed in points. Berg balance scale scores range from 0 to 56. The lower is the score, the higher is the risk of loosing balance and fall.
The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)
Short Physical Performance Battery
Time Frame: The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)
The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is a standardized tool used to assess lower extremity function through a series of tasks, including balance, walking speed, and chair stands, with the results expressed in points. The scores range from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance).
The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
C-reactive protein
Time Frame: The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)
C-reactive protein (CRP) is a blood test used to measure the level of inflammation in the body, which can indicate the presence and severity of infection or other inflammatory conditions, with the results expressed in milligrams per liter (mg/L)
The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)
Procalcitonin blood levels ng/ml
Time Frame: The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)
Procalcitonin is a blood test used to assess the level of procalcitonin, a biomarker that helps indicate the presence and severity of bacterial infections, particularly sepsis. It is also an important marker of the inflammatory process and oxidative stress in stroke patients, with the results expressed in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL).
The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Katarzyna Hojan, Assoc Prof, Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields stimulation

Subscribe