Quantification of Parkinson's Disease Patients As a Biomarker for Classification, Prediction and Response to Treatment

February 19, 2025 updated by: Stardots AB

Using Mathematical Quantification of Limb and Eye Movements of Parkinson's Disease Patients As a Biomarker for Classification and Prediction of Disease State and Response to Treatment

This is a three-armed open investigational study that aims to differentiate, quantify, and categorize abnormal eye movements and upper limbs movements in patients with Parkinson's disease. The study is using investigational non-invasive devices for that reason including ANLIVA® Hand Movement and ANLIVA® Eye Movement.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To evaluate performance of mathematical models developed to quantify and classify symptoms and disease state using sensor data from smart phone and eye tracking cameras in subjects with Parkinson's disease.

A clinical investigator will be capturing data from the clinical encounter completed by default the same day in addition to other clinical questionnaires subjects will be filling themselves. A percentage of subjects will be asked prior to their arrival to be part of a subset study called OFF/ON study, where they will be asked not to take their IPD oral home medications prior to arrival. Both study procedure elements will be performed at the beginning of the evaluation and 60 minutes after taking their medication. There is also a longitudinal study part, where a percentage of the subjects will be asked to visit the clinic with 6 months interval, up to 4 times, including the first visit. There will be a percentage of approached subjects that belong to the category of Essential Tremor (ET) and Healthy control (HC) used for comparison purposes. ET and HC subjects will undergo the same recruitment and testing process.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Hampshire
      • Manchester, New Hampshire, United States, 03104
        • Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

For inclusion in the investigation, the subjects must fulfil all the below criteria prior to enrolment:

  1. Subjects already diagnosed with Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (IPD)
  2. or subjects already diagnosed with Essential tremor (ET)
  3. or subjects who are healthy controls (HC) and are not diagnosed with IPD or ET
  4. Able to understand and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects that meet any of the below criteria will be excluded:

  1. Not able to sign the informed consent form
  2. Below 18 years of age
  3. Diagnosed with movement disorder other than IPD or ET that might interfere with hand movements or eye movements (tics, myoclonus, chorea, dystonia, etc)
  4. Has parkinsonism not due to IPD (drug induced, functional, vascular, etc)
  5. Visual or physical limitations that prevent the subject from performing the baseline eye study requirements
  6. Being involved in the planning and conduct of the clinical investigation (applies to all sponsor management staff, investigational staff and third-party vendors as applicable)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: ON, One visit

Subject visit one time at clinic for tests and assessments. Subject type are Essential Tremor (ET), Healthy Control (HC) or Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (IPD).

The first arm will include the majority of subjects that will be enrolled in a onetime only study procedure performance. Subjects of this arm will carry the diagnosis of IPD, ET, or HC. After the completion of their first research visit and completing study procedures, there will be no future visits or procedures.

Evaluation of performance of mathematical models developed to quantify and classify symptoms and disease state using sensor data from smart phone and eye tracking cameras
Other: OFF/ON

Subject visit one time at clinic for tests and assessments without medication, carry out tests and assessments, then take medication according to the protocol, then carry our tests and assessments.

Subject type are Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease.

Evaluation of performance of mathematical models developed to quantify and classify symptoms and disease state using sensor data from smart phone and eye tracking cameras
IPD subjects will be informed head of time not to take their dopaminergic medications and other Parkinson's non-dopaminergic medications such as anticholinergics, NMDA inhibitors, and adenosine blockers for at least 12 hours prior to their initial procedure. Immediately, after conducting both hand movement and eye movement tests, the patient will take 150% of their routine home dopaminergic medications dose right in the clinic. They will also take their non-dopaminergic medications doses similar to home dose with no change. This will be under the supervision of their treating movement disorders specialist and study PI.
Other: ON, Longitudinal
IPD subjects will be asked to repeat the study visit and procedures every 6 months for longitudinal monitoring.
Evaluation of performance of mathematical models developed to quantify and classify symptoms and disease state using sensor data from smart phone and eye tracking cameras

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantification of current IPD motor symptoms using kinetic tremor and Dyskinesia test
Time Frame: Day 1

ANLIVA® Hand Movement score of kinetic tremor test and dyskinesia test will be measured. Measurements are done on subjects upper limb movements. SD score of kinetic tremor test and dyskinesia test will be assessed by assessors.

SD is acronym for Stardots-Dartmouth score. The SD score will be used to benchmark the ANLIVA® device assessments as a nonreference standard.

Minimum value is 0; maximum value is 4. A higher value on the SD score means more movement disorder.

Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantification of current IPD motor symptoms using rest tremor and postural tremor test
Time Frame: Day 1

ANLIVA® Hand Movement score of rest tremor test and postural test will be measured. Measurements are done on subjects upper limb movements. SD score of rest test and postural tremor test will be assessed by assessors.

SD is acronym for Stardots-Dartmouth score. The SD score will be used to benchmark the ANLIVA® device assessments as a nonreference standard.

Minimum value is 0; maximum value is 4. A higher value on the SD score means more movement disorder.

Day 1
Classification between Dyskinesia or kinetic tremor
Time Frame: Day 1

ANLIVA® Hand Movement score of kinetic tremor test and dyskinesia test will be measured. Measurements are done on subjects upper limb movements. This will be compared to assessments of SD score Dyskinesia classification.

SD is acronym for Stardots-Dartmouth score. The SD score will be used to benchmark the ANLIVA® device assessments as a nonreference standard.

Minimum value is 0; maximum value is 4. A higher value on the SD score means more movement disorder.

Day 1

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Collect data for developing test for bradykinesia (exploratory)
Time Frame: Day 1
Bradykinesia part of ANLIVA® Hand Movement will be measured. Measurements are done on subjects upper limb movements.
Day 1
Derive optimized variables for objective quantification and/or classification of ocular movements (exploratory)
Time Frame: Day 1
Ocular movements will be measured using ANLIVA® Eye Movement. Measurements are done on subjects eye movements
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anas Hannoun, MD, Dartmouth Hitchcock medical center, Manchester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 6, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Evaluation of mathematical models

Subscribe