Three-Dimensional Assessment of Dentoskeletal Changes Associated With a Modified Twin Block Appliance

September 15, 2024 updated by: Aml Saeed Mohamed Abdel qader, Cairo University

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Dentoskeletal Changes Associated With a Modified Twin Block Appliance for Treatment of Skeletal Class II Growing Patients With Mandibular Deficiency: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of the current study is to evaluate the skeletal, dental, soft tissue, TMJ, and upper airway size changes associated with a new design of twin block compared to the conventional twin block appliance. Additionally, patients' satisfaction with the two designs will be assessed.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Twin block appliance is the gold standard for the treatment of skeletal class II patients with deficient mandible. Yet, it has some drawbacks as proclination of the mandibular incisors, development of posterior open bite and the unesthetic appearance. Many modifications in twin block A new design were made to overcome the previous problems, as adding incisor capping, Clasps, sagittal blocks, and esthetic twin block appliances. In the current trial A new design of esthetic twin block appliance with sagittal blocks is investigated and the post treatment skeletal, dental, and soft tissue, TMJ, and upper airway size will be assessed and compared to the changes associated with the conventional design of twin block. Moreover, patient satisfaction with the appliance will be assessed with both appliances.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • skeletal class II deficient mandible
  • Class II molar and canine relation
  • male growing patients CVM 2,3 age range 10-14
  • normal vertical growth pattern
  • ANB > 4
  • mild to moderate crowding

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Craniofacial syndrome.
  • Periodontal disease.
  • Extracted first permanent molars.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: conventional twin block
Growing patients with class II skeletal discrepancy due to mandibular deficiency will be treated with the conventional design of twin block previously introduced by Clark.
Vacuum formed twin block appliance with sagittal blocks
Experimental: Vacuum formed twin block appliance with sagittal blocks
Growing patients with class II skeletal discrepancy due to mandibular deficiency will be treated with a modified design of twin block formed of vacuum sheets with sagittal blocks.
Vacuum formed twin block appliance with sagittal blocks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
skeletal changes
Time Frame: 9 months
changes in SNA, SNB, and ANB angles will be measured before and after treatment
9 months
Dental changes
Time Frame: 9 months
changes in maxillary and mandibular incisors position and inclination will be assessed before and after treatment
9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
soft tissue changes
Time Frame: 9 months
changes in soft tissue A, B, Pog points will be assessed before and after treatment
9 months
JMJ changes
Time Frame: 9 months
changes in the TMJ morphologic structure will be assessed before and after treatment
9 months
Upper airway size
Time Frame: 9 months
changes in the Upper airway size will be assessed before and after treatment
9 months
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: after one and nine months
patients acceptance of the appliance will be assessed by a questionnaire administered in one to one interview.
after one and nine months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

September 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Growth Modification

Clinical Trials on modified design of twin block

Subscribe