Study to Measure the Effect of Part Time Versus Full Time Orthodontic Appliance Wear

January 3, 2017 updated by: Queen Mary University of London

A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating the Skeletal and Dental Effects of a Removable Brace That Works on the Upper and Lower Teeth at the Same Time Worn Part Time Versus Full Time

The aim of this study is to assess skeletal (bone) and dental (teeth) changes occurring following wear of a twin block functional appliance (removable brace which postures the lower jaw forward to improve a discrepancy between the upper and lower jaw) for differing time periods.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Functional appliances are ordinarily worn full time in adolescence between 11 and 14 years with a discrepancy between their upper and lower jaws. The reason it is worn between these ages is to avail of the pre pubertal growth spurt, evidence for full time wear is merely empirical.If this appliance only had to be worn part time it would have a significant change in orthodontics in terms of patient acceptance and compliance.The investigators plan on recruiting 84 patients to the study and these subjects will be referred from hospital colleagues. The investigators will randomly allocate the subjects into 2 groups, Group 1 will wear the appliance Full Time(24hours), group 2 will wear the appliance part time(12hours).

The study will be conducted in the Dental Institute at the Royal London Hospital, this hospital setting will be the sole site.

The study will last for 15 months from the time the last patient is recruited. Participants will undergo an initial records appointment where a radiograph and clinical measurements will be taken followed by 12 months of functional appliance treatment where the patient will be reviewed at 6-8weekly intervals and clinical measurements taken.A final radiograph will be taken at 15months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, E1 1BB
        • Dental Insitiute Royal London Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 14 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Class II div 1 malocclusion(upper front teeth lying more forward than lower front teeth with upper front teeth proclined),
  • Overjet(horizontal difference between upper and lower front teeth) measuring minimum of 7mm,
  • Male subjects 12--14 years at the start of treatment,
  • Female subjects 11--13 years at start of treatment,
  • Willingness of the patient and parent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No previous orthodontic treatment
  • No relevant medical history or craniofacial syndrome

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Part time (12hour) wear
the' Modified Clark Twin Block' will be worn part time
The Modified Clark Twin Block is a type of functional orthodontic appliance used to posture the lower jaw forward to treat discrepancies between the upper and lower jaw bones
Other Names:
  • Twin Block
  • Clark Twin Block
  • Functional Appliance
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Full time (24hour) wear
the ' Modified Clark Twin Block' will be worn full time
The Modified Clark Twin Block is a type of functional orthodontic appliance used to posture the lower jaw forward to treat discrepancies between the upper and lower jaw bones
Other Names:
  • Twin Block
  • Clark Twin Block
  • Functional Appliance

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
remaining overjet measured with an orthodontic ruler
Time Frame: outcome measure will be assessed after 12 months appliance wear and after a 3 month relapse period
the initial overjet will compared to the final overjet following 12 months of appliance treatment, and 3 months of relapse. overjet will be measured with an orthodontic ruler at every review appointment
outcome measure will be assessed after 12 months appliance wear and after a 3 month relapse period
Cephalometric Changes
Time Frame: Outcome will be assessed after 12m of appliance wear and after 3 months of settling.
Both linear and angular cephalometric changes will be assessed over this timeframe.
Outcome will be assessed after 12m of appliance wear and after 3 months of settling.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of subjective and objective measures of appliance wear
Time Frame: 12 months of appliance wear
Subjective (patient completed time charts) and objective (theramon micro-sensor) measures of wear will be assessed over 12months of appliance wear.
12 months of appliance wear

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kate Counihan, BDS, Queen Mary University of London
  • Principal Investigator: Jeet Parekh, BDS, Queen Mary University of London

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 15, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 4, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ReDA Ref: 009038

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

Clinical Trials on Modified Clark Twin Block

3
Subscribe