SetUp Study for HugoTM RAS Inguinal Hernia Repair (SUSHI)

September 13, 2024 updated by: Filip Muysoms, Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares

A Multicenter Comparative Prospective Observational Cohort Study About Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair Using Two Different Robotic Systems

The goal of this observational cohort study is to evaluate the evolution of the operative time in performing robotic assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (rTAPP) during the learning curve of the first 50 patients using the HugoTM Ras (Medtronic) robotic system using the setup guide.

Researchers will compare to the operative time for rTAPP of 50 patients by the same surgeon in another hospital using the daVinci Xi (Intuitive Surgical) robotic system.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

As a result of human cadaveric sessions to evaluate the approach of inguinal hernia repair using the Hugo RAS robotic system a setup guide was produced. Preclinic tests on dummies, cadaveric models and porcine models were performed. During a first session using dummies, the existing set-up guide proposed by US surgeons was tested and validated.

To evaluate the evolution of the operative time in performing robotic assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (rTAPP) during the learning curve of the first 50 patients using the HugoTM Ras (Medtronic) robotic system using the setup guide at the Sint Vincentius Hospital in Deinze. This will be compared to the operative time for rTAPP of 50 patients by the same surgeon in General hospital Maria Middelares using the daVinci Xi (Intuitive Surgical) robotic system.

Patient data and outcome data will be collected. A follow-up of 1 month postoperative is foreseen for the evaluation of short-term complications and quality of life 1 month after surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Deinze, Belgium
        • Recruiting
        • AZ Sint-Vincentius
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Filip Muysoms, MD, PhD
      • Ghent, Belgium, 9000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • AZ Maria Middelares
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Filip Muysoms, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria: All patients planned for a minimal invasive (robotic assisted laparoscopic) inguinal hernia repair during the study period will be invited to take part in the study. Both unilateral and bilateral hernias will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent hernias after previous preperitoneal mesh placement.
  • Inguinal hernias after abdominal prostatectomy.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Emergency surgery.
  • Age below 18 years.
  • Absence of informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: HugoTM Ras (Medtronic) robotic system
The patient is positioned supine position and a tilt of Trendelenburg of 12 degrees is given. A Verres needle insufflation at Palmers' point at the left subcostal margin will be done to achieve a pneumoperitoneum of 12 mmHg. Subsequently, a trocar of 12 mm is placed at the upper margin of the umbilicus using an optical trocar. Two further trocars of 8 mm are placed left and right side at 7 to 8 cm distance from the umbilical trocar and 2 cm caudal from the umbilical trocar. The setup of the arms, tilt and angles are done using the setup guide. The operation is performed using a scope with a 0°-degree angle. As instruments we have a fenestrated bipolar forceps in the left hand and a monopolar curved scissors in the right hand. Mesh used will be DextileTM Anatomical Mesh X-Large of 16x12 cm. There is a left sided and a right sided version and in bilateral hernias the meshes will overlap on the midline. The peritoneum is closed using a barbed suture (V-Loc 3/0) of 15 cm in length.
robot-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (rTAR)
Active Comparator: daVinci Xi (Intuitive Surgical) robotic system
An 8-mm trocar will be placed at the supraumbilical position after creation of pneumoperitoneum using a Verress needle with an intra-abdominal pressure of 12 mmHg. Two additional trocars (8 mm) are placed bilaterally in the flank at the level of the umbilicus under direct vision. The distance between the lateral trocars and the umbilical trocar will be 7 cm at minimum. The Progrip™ Laparoscopic Self-Fixating Mesh of 12×16 cm (anatomic version, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, US) will be used. The suture will be a slowly absorbable barbed suture 15 cm in length (V-Loc™ 90, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, US). The trocars are docked to the robotic arms, with the endoscope at the umbilicus. Inguinal hernia repair will be performed according to the standard surgical principle.
robot-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (rTAR)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative times
Time Frame: Minutes, up to 4 hours
Comparison of operative times for rTAPP
Minutes, up to 4 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short-term complications
Time Frame: until 30 days after the surgical procedure
Evaluation of short term complications
until 30 days after the surgical procedure
Quality of Life (QoL) one month after surgery
Time Frame: until 30 days after the surgical procedure
Evaluation of quality of life 1 month after surgery, using the EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire, a lower score means a better quality of life
until 30 days after the surgical procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

September 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inguinal Hernia

Clinical Trials on robotic surgical platform

Subscribe