Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training on Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes

February 20, 2025 updated by: LIU FANG, Hong Kong Metropolitan University

Effect of Inspiratory Muscle Training on Respiratory Function, Diaphragm Thickness, Balance Control, Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in People After Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This study is designed to explore the effects of a 4-week protocol of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) at 50% maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) on respiratory function, diaphragm thickness, balance control, exercise capacity, and quality of life in people after stroke. To ascertain the effect of IMT on the relationship between diaphragm muscle contraction and activation of other trunk muscles, this study also explores whether any effect of the 4-week IMT protocol on balance control is associated with changes in the anticipatory posture adjustments (APAs) time - the onset time of postural muscles during a required task (e.g., the rapid shoulder flexion test).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • None Selected
      • Shenzhen, None Selected, China
        • Recruiting
        • Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 40 years and < 80 years;
  • breathing spontaneously;
  • clinically diagnosed with ischemic and/or haemorrhagic stroke;
  • duration of stroke from onset falls within 1 month to 12 months after diagnosis;
  • no thoracic or abdominal surgery within the last 6 months;
  • able to understand and follow verbal instructions;
  • no facial palsy, or mild facial palsy without limitation of labial occlusion;
  • able to maintain a resting sitting posture without feet support for at least 30 seconds;
  • no cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≥ 26);
  • able to independently walk at least 10 meters with or without an assistive device.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute myocardial infarction or acute heart failure;
  • acute pain in any part of the body;
  • with respiratory illness or positive clinical signs of impaired respiratory function (such as shortness of breath, hypoxemia, chronic cough and sputum retention);
  • with chronic cardiovascular dysfunction;
  • Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) score ≥ 20.
  • patient with a nasal feeding tube, tracheal tube and/or any condition that prevents the measurement or the implementation of the study procedure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Group A (sham IMT- stable group)
conventional treatment + sham IMT
with 10% maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) as the training intensity, IMT will be conducted on a stable surface
Participants in all groups will receive a standardised conventional rehabilitation protocol. It includes limb range of motion, muscle tone reduction, strengthening and endurance of limb muscles, transfer skills, task-directed movements, general gait training, and activities of daily living training.
Experimental: Group B (IMT-stable group)
conventional treatment + target IMT while sitting on a stable surface
Participants in all groups will receive a standardised conventional rehabilitation protocol. It includes limb range of motion, muscle tone reduction, strengthening and endurance of limb muscles, transfer skills, task-directed movements, general gait training, and activities of daily living training.
50% MIP as the training intensity, IMT will be conducted while sitting on a stable surface
Experimental: Group C (IMT-unstable group)
conventional treatment + target IMT while sitting on an unstable surface
Participants in all groups will receive a standardised conventional rehabilitation protocol. It includes limb range of motion, muscle tone reduction, strengthening and endurance of limb muscles, transfer skills, task-directed movements, general gait training, and activities of daily living training.
50% MIP as the training intensity, IMT will be conducted while sitting on an unstable surface

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diaphragmatic thickness
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
The diaphragmatic thickness of both the left and right diaphragms will be measured by ultrasound. (Mindray M9, Shenzhen, China).
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sitting Balance
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
A force plate will be used to measure changes in the center of pressure during the performance of various tasks in sitting positions.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is a measurement used in pulmonary function tests to assess lung function. It refers to the total volume of air that a person can forcibly exhale from their lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. It will be measured using the spirometer.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1)
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) measures the volume of air a person can forcibly exhale in the first second of a forced breath. It will be measured using the spirometer.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) is a measure used in pulmonary function testing to assess the strength of the respiratory muscles, particularly the muscles used for inhalation. It will be measured using the spirometer.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Falls efficacy scale international
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention, 12-week follow-up after the end of intervention
The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) is a questionnaire measuring fear of falling in older adults. It has 16 items, scored from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater fear. It's used in clinical settings to assess fall risk and tailor interventions.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention, 12-week follow-up after the end of intervention
6-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
The 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) measures how far someone can walk in six minutes. It assesses exercise capacity and mobility.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Stroke Impact Scale
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention, 12-week follow-up after the end of intervention
The Chinese version of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 (SIS) will be used to measure the quality of life. A higher overall score suggests better physical, emotional, and social functioning, while a lower score may indicate more significant impairment or limitations.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention, 12-week follow-up after the end of intervention
Anticipatory posture adjustments (APAs) time of trunk muscles
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Participants will be requested to perform a rapid shoulder flexion test on the force plate. Surface electromyography (sEMG) (Noraxon USA, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, USA) will be used to measure Anticipatory posture adjustments (APAs) time of trunk muscles.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS)
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention, 12-week follow-up after the end of intervention
The TIS is a rating scale used to measure static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance, and trunk coordination. The total TIS score ranges from 0 to 23 points, with a higher score indicating better trunk function.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention, 12-week follow-up after the end of intervention
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention, 12-week follow-up after the end of intervention
TUG is a test to measure the time that a participant needs to stand up from a standard armchair, walk a short distance of about 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down again.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention, 12-week follow-up after the end of intervention
Trunk muscle activity
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Surface electromyography (sEMG) (Noraxon USA, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, USA) will be used to measure the bilateral muscle activity of the erector spinae, rectus abdominis, external oblique muscle, internal oblique muscle, and transversus abdominis during sitting balance tests on the force plate.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
The BBS measures balance and fall risk through 14 tasks scored from 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating better balance.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
TUG is a test to measure the time that a participant needs to stand up from a standard armchair, walk a short distance of about 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down again.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
10-meter Walk Test
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
The 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) measures how quickly someone can walk a 10-meter distance. It's used to assess walking speed and mobility.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Falls efficacy scale international
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention, 12-week follow-up after the end of intervention
The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) is a questionnaire measuring fear of falling in older adults. It has 16 items, scored from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater fear. It's used in clinical settings to assess fall risk and tailor interventions.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention, 12-week follow-up after the end of intervention
6-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
The 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) measures how far someone can walk in six minutes. It assesses exercise capacity and mobility.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Stroke Impact Scale
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention, 12-week follow-up after the end of intervention
The Chinese version of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 (SIS) will be used to measure the quality of life. A higher overall score suggests better physical, emotional, and social functioning, while a lower score may indicate more significant impairment or limitations.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention, 12-week follow-up after the end of intervention
Trunk muscle activity
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Surface electromyography (sEMG) (Noraxon USA, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, USA) will be used to measure the bilateral muscle activity of the erector spinae, rectus abdominis, external oblique muscle, internal oblique muscle, and transversus abdominis during sitting and standing balance tests.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Anticipatory posture adjustments (APAs) time of trunk muscles
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
Participants will be requested to perform a rapid shoulder flexion test on the force plate. Surface electromyography (sEMG) (Noraxon USA, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, USA) will be used to measure Anticipatory posture adjustments (APAs) time of trunk muscles.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention
15-point rating scale
Time Frame: baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention, 12-week follow-up after the end of intervention
A 15-point rating scale will be used to rate the excise tolerance changes of the patients since the beginning of IMT intervention. The scale scores range from -7 ("a very great deal worse") to 0 ("about the same") to +7 ("a very great deal better"). Therapists and patients will be blinded to each other and rate the exercise tolerance change of the patient. The averaged rates of therapist and patient will be the final rate. Patients with an average rating of +3 ("somewhat better") or higher will be considered to have improvement. Patients with an average rating of +2 (a little bit better) to -2 (a little bit worse) will be considered to have remained stable. Patients with an average rating of -3 ("somewhat worse") or lower will be considered to have worsened.
baseline, after 4 weeks of intervention, 12-week follow-up after the end of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 21, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on sham IMT

Subscribe