Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for HIV+ Hazardous Drinkers

February 2, 2026 updated by: Syracuse University

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for HIV+ Hazardous Drinkers: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Alcohol consumption is a critical factor in HIV treatment that significantly contributes to poor treatment-related outcomes. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of alcohol interventions for people with HIV (PWH) have had limited success, perhaps due to an increasingly recognized co-morbitity of co-occurring hazardous alcohol use and other mental health-related problems among PWH. This has necessitated a shift in the literature towards trans-diagnostic approaches that target core psychological processes that underlie multiple mental health-related problems. One trans-diagnostic mechanism that is relevant to alcohol and other substance use is experiential avoidance (EA)- i.e., repeated, and maladaptive, use of substances and/or other behaviors to escape or avoid unwanted thoughts, feelings, and/or urges. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) targets EA and is an empirically supported treatment for multiple psychological and behavioral health-related outcomes; however there have not been any full-scale RCTs of ACT for alcohol use among any population, including PWH. The investigators recently adapted a telephone-delivered ACT intervention originally developed for smoking cessation, into an intervention for PWH who drink at unhealthy levels (NIH/NIAAA; R34AA026246). This six-session, telephone-delivered ACT intervention for alcohol use showed high feasibility and acceptability in a pilot RCT conducted by our team. The overall objective of this application is therefore to determine if ACT can significantly reduce alcohol use and comorbid symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress among adult PWH who drink at unhealthy levels. The specific aims are: To determine the relative efficacy of ACT, compared to BI, for reducing alcohol use among PWH (Aim 1) and to determine if ACT has an effect on trans-diagnostic processes that in turn affect alcohol use and other psychological and functional outcomes (Aim 2). The investigators will accomplish these aims by: conducting a remote, RCT in which the investigators randomly assign 300 PWH who drink at unhealthy levels to either the ACT intervention the investigators developed (n = 150), or a BI intervention (n = 150) previously shown to reduce alcohol use among PWH. The investigators will assess alcohol-related outcomes-via self-report and a biomarker- at baseline, post-treatment (7 weeks post-baseline), and again 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-randomization. The investigators will also measure EA to determine if it mediates treatment effects for alcohol use and other psychological and functional outcomes, measured at all timepoints.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Alcohol use has a substantial impact on HIV care. Sixty-seven percent of people with HIV (PWH) report using alcohol in the previous year, 27-40% report drinking at unhealthy levels and ~30% meet criteria for alcohol use disorder (AUD). PWH who are unhealthy drinkers, compared to those who abstain or drink relatively less, experience a significant increase in risk for: mortality, lack of viral suppression, less antiretroviral therapy (ART) utilization and sub-optimal adherence to ART. Unhealthy alcohol consumption has been found to affect nearly every stage of the HIV care continuum, making it a critical factor in HIV treatment.

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of alcohol interventions for PWH have had limited success, likely due to lack of attention to co-morbid mental health problems. There have been several reviews of this literature, the most recent of which identified 9 non-overlapping behavioral trials developed specifically to target alcohol use and conducted in the U.S. with adult samples of PWH. Only four of these nine trials resulted in significant effects on alcohol-related outcomes and only two trials had effects on alcohol-related outcomes that were significantly different from the control group at 12-month follow-up. One hypothesized reason for this limited success is an increasingly recognized comorbidity of co-occurring unhealthy alcohol use and other mental health-related problems among PWH. Indeed, up to 63% of PWH meet criteria for both a substance use disorder and another psychiatric disorder-necessitating a shift in the literature towards trans-diagnostic approaches that target core psychological processes that underlie multiple mental health and substance-related problems[. One trans-diagnostic mechanism that is particularly relevant to alcohol and other substance use is experiential avoidance (EA)- i.e., repeated, and maladaptive, use of substances and/or other behaviors to escape or avoid unwanted thoughts, feelings, and/or urges.

Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a promising trans-diagnostic intervention for PWH.

ACT is a trans-diagnostic treatment that targets experiential avoidance as an underlying factor common to mental and behavioral health problems. Mindfulness skills and values-guided behavioral action plans are used to decrease experiential avoidance and impact a broad array of psychological symptoms via improved psychological acceptance. A recent review of 20 meta-analyses, based on 133 studies, found ACT to be efficacious across multiple psychological and behavioral health-related outcomes including: depression, anxiety, chronic pain, stress, and trans-diagnostic combinations of conditions. Additionally, three meta- analyses have found ACT to be efficacious for smoking and other drug use and there is an emerging literature suggesting ACT is a promising approach for alcohol use. There have not, however, been any full- scale RCTs of ACT for alcohol use among any population, including PWH. Given ACT's potential to improve multiple psychological and alcohol-related problems simultaneously, it holds great promise as an intervention for PWH who are unhealthy drinkers. The investigators recently adapted a telephone-delivered ACT intervention originally developed for smoking cessation, into an intervention for PWH who drink at unhealthy levels (NIH/NIAAA; R34AA026246). With a multidisciplinary team, and with two rounds of input from PWH, the investigators developed a six- session, telephone-delivered ACT intervention for alcohol use and subsequently conducted a pilot feasibility/acceptability RCT. The investigators found high acceptability of the adapted ACT intervention, and evidence of feasibility for conducting a full-scale, remote, RCT.

The overall objective of this application is therefore to determine the relative efficacy of ACT, compared to a standard Brief Alcohol Intervention (BI), for reducing alcohol use and comorbid symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress among adult PWH who are unhealthy drinkers. The application's specific aims are to:

Aim 1: Determine the relative efficacy of ACT, compared to BI, for reducing alcohol use among PWH.

To achieve this aim, the investigators will: conduct a fully remote, relative efficacy RCT. The investigators will randomly assign 300 PWH who are unhealthy drinkers to either the ACT intervention the investigators developed (n = 150), or a BI intervention (n = 150) previously shown to reduce alcohol use among PWH. The investigators will assess alcohol-related outcomes-via self-report and an objective biomarker (phosphatidylethanol) - at baseline, post-treatment (7 weeks post-baseline), and again 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-randomization. The investigators hypothesize that: the two treatments will have significant, and statistically equivalent, effects on alcohol use at post-treatment and 3-months (H1) and, consistent with a sleeper effect for ACT, the ACT condition will have superior alcohol outcomes at 6- and 12-months post- randomization (H2).

Aim 2: Determine if ACT has an effect on trans-diagnostic processes that in turn affect alcohol use and other psychological and functional outcomes. To achieve this aim, the investigators will: measure EA and determine if it mediates treatment effects for alcohol use and other psychological and functional outcomes. The investigators hypothesize that: ACT will have superior outcomes on stress, anxiety, depression, and functional outcomes at all follow-up timepoints (H3) and that EA will be a significant mediator of all treatment effects, including alcohol use (H4).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Sarah E Woolf-King, PhD
  • Phone Number: 314-443-2354
  • Email: sewoolf@syr.edu

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Syracuse, New York, United States, 13244
        • Recruiting
        • Syracuse University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Sarah E Woolf-King, PhD
          • Phone Number: 315-443-9917
          • Email: sewoolf@syr.edu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Living with HIV
  • Drink at unhealthy levels based on self-reported answers to the AUDIT-C, referencing drinking over the previous 3 months [score of ≥4 (men) or ≥3 (women) will be used to identify eligible participants]
  • on HIV treatment and are
  • 18 years or older.
  • Read at an 8th grade level
  • Can provide a physical address
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anyone with a score = 12 on the AUDIT-C will be excluded.
  • Anyone with a score ≥20 on the PHQ-9, indicative of severe depression, will be excluded.
  • Anyone with a score of ≥15 on the GAD-7, indicative of severe anxiety, will be excluded.

Referrals for mental health treatment will be given to all participants who screen out.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
Participants randomized to the ACT arm will receive six, weekly, 30-45-minute ACT intervention sessions delivered via telephone.
ACT is a trans-diagnostic treatment that targets experiential avoidance as an underlying factor common to mental and behavioral health problems. Mindfulness skills and values-guided behavioral action plans are used to decrease experiential avoidance and impact a broad array of psychological symptoms via improved psychological acceptance.
Other Names:
  • ACT
Active Comparator: Brief Alcohol Intervention (BI)
Participants randomized to BI will receive two 30-60 minute sessions of a brief alcohol intervention delivered via telephone, two 5-10-minute booster calls, and two 5-minute reminder phone calls.
The Brief Alcohol Intervention (BI) is a standard intervention for reducing alcohol use in PWH. The BI includes the creation of a drinking agreement, self-monitoring via drinking diary cards, discussion of risky moods/situation, and strategies for managing these moods/situations.
Other Names:
  • BI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alcohol use - Frequency
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
The Timeline Followback will be used to estimate the Number of Drinking Days 30 days prior to study visit appointment
Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
Alcohol Use - Quantity
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
The Timeline Followback will be used to estimate the Number of Drinks per Drinking Day 30 days prior to study visit appointment
Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
Phosphatidylethanol (PEth)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
PEth is a metabolite, formed only in the presence of alcohol use and detectable in dried blood spots for approximately 3-4 weeks. The investigators will use both absolute PEth values and a cutoff of 50 mg/ml to indicate recent unhealthy alcohol use. Based on the consideration of both prevalence of underreport in the sample, the investigators will also consider using a compound measure of PEth+ (PEth ≥50ng/ml) and/or self-reported Alcohol Quantity & Frequency via the AUDIT-C+ (≥4, men; ≥3, women) for any unhealthy alcohol use in the last 21 days as an outcome of interest.
Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptoms of Anxiety
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
Symptom of anxiety will be measured using the Generalized Anxiety Questionnaire (GAD-7). There are 7 items rated on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The GAD-7 total score ranges from 0 (no anxiety) to 21 (severe anxiety).
Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
Symptoms of Depression
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
Symptoms of depression will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). There are 9 items rated on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The PHQ-9 total score ranges from 0 (no depression) to 27 (severe depression).
Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
Self-reported levels of Stress
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
Self-reported levels of stress will be measured using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). The PSS consists of 10 items rated on a scale from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). The total score ranges from 0 (indicating no stress) to 40 (indicating high levels of stress).
Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
Biological levels of Stress
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
Biological levels of stress will be measured by assessing levels of cortisol in samples of nails
Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
Symptoms of Experiential Avoidance
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
Experiential Avoidance will be measured with the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ). The BEAQ consists of 15 items rated on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from 15 (indicating low experiential avoidance) to 90 (indicating high experiential avoidance).
Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alcohol-related Problems
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
Alcohol-related problems will be measured using the Short Inventory of Problems (SIP). The SIP consists of 15 items rated either 0 (no) or 1 (yes). Higher total scores indicate more alcohol-related problems.
Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
Adherence to HIV Medications
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
Adherence to HIV medications will be measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS is a single-item measure where individuals rate their adherence on a scale from 0% (no adherence) to 100% (perfect adherence). The score is represented as a percentage, with higher scores indicating better adherence to HIV medication.
Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
Functional Impairment
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline
Functional impairment will be assessed using the Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning (B-IPF). The B-IPF consists of 7 items rated on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 6 (very much). The total score ranges from 0 (indicating no functional impairment) to 42 (indicating severe functional impairment).
Measured at baseline, 8 weeks post-baseline, 3-, 6- , 12-months post-baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 22, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Per NOT-AA-22-011, this study will submit and share data with NIAAA Data Archive (NIAAADA), a data repository housed within the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive (NDA). To this end, the study will fulfill all tasks and expectations associated with NIAAA Data Archive (NIAAADA) Data Sharing Plan (DSP)

IPD Sharing Time Frame

We will share data in accordance with the default NIAAADA data sharing schedule in accordance with the applicable Data Sharing Terms and Conditions of award.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Drinking

Clinical Trials on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

Subscribe