Pacing of Left Bundle Branch Area and Atroventricular Node ablatIon in Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation (PALLIATE-AF)

May 14, 2025 updated by: Eue-Keun Choi, Seoul National University Hospital
This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing combined with atrioventricular node ablation and pharmacologic treatment optimized according to guidelines in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation refractory or intolerant to drug therapy or catheter ablation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  • Multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial
  • Randomization 1:1 fashion A randomly permuted-block randomization list was generated by computer at a central location and was stratified by center.
  • Study duration:

    1. 6 months (for primary outcome)
    2. 24 months (for secondary outcomes)
  • Study subjects number: 50 patients (25 patients per group)
  • Procedures

    • Atrioventricular node ablation after successful left bundle branch area pacing at the same procedure time.
    • Left bundle branch area pacing will be performed in all patients (using lumenless or stylet-driven lead, on the operator's discretion)
    • Atrioventricular node ablation will be performed using the quadripolar 7-Fr 3.5-mm tip ablation catheter and the use of 8.5-F sheath (SR0 or SL1, St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) depending on the operator's experience, and if not stable or failed, a deflectable sheath (Agilis, Abbott Electrophysiology, Menlo Park, CA, USA) will be used. Repeated ablation procedures will be recommended during follow-up if regression of atrioventricular block has occurred.
    • Immediately after implant, devices were programmed to achieve the shortest QRS duration. Unipolar pacing was initially used to determine left bundle branch capture.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Jongno-gu
      • Seoul, Jongno-gu, Korea, Republic of, 03080
        • Recruiting
        • Seoul National University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion:

Patients who meet all of the following inclusion criteria 1)-6).

  1. Permanent atrial fibrillation
  2. Age ≥ 65 years
  3. Refractory or intolerant to antiarrhythmic drugs, rate control medications, or catheter ablation
  4. New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II- IV
  5. LVEF > 40% (within the past 3 months)
  6. Patients with at least one of the following:

    1. HF hospitalization (defined as HF as the major reason for hospitalization or treatment for HF lasting ≥12 hours and including treatment with intravenous (IV) diuretics at a healthcare facility) within 12 months
    2. Elevated NT-proBNP (>900 pg/ml) in the 30 days prior to enrollment

Exclusion:

Patients who meet at least one of the following exclusion criteria 1)-11).

  1. Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation
  2. Life expectancy to < 12 months.
  3. Primary moderate to severe valvular disease (except for functional mitral valve regurgitation or tricuspid valve regurgitation)
  4. Mechanical tricuspid valve replacement
  5. Severe chronic kidney disease (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate ≤ 15 ml/1,73 m2 or receiving renal replacement treatment including hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis)
  6. Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  7. Infiltrative cardiomyopathy (amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, Fabry disease, others)
  8. Acute coronary syndrome or coronary revascularization (CABG or PCI) <3 months
  9. Severe primary pulmonary disease such as cor pulmonale, irreversible lung disease requiring inhalers, oxygen supplementation
  10. Pacemaker/ICD/CRT treatment ongoing, or current pacemaker indication
  11. Simultaneous participation in a different randomized clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: LBBAP+AVNA arm
Left bundle branch area pacing combined with atrioventricular node ablation.

Left bundle branch pacing is a novel pacing modality that can bypass the pathological or disease-vulnerable region in the cardiac conduction system, to provide physiological pacing modality for patients.

The procedure involves the implantation of a permanent pacemaker with a pacing lead positioned at the left bundle branch area to achieve physiological conduction system pacing. LBBAP-Pacemaker device and leads should be implanted according to the physician's standard practice.

Atrioventricular node ablation uses heat energy, called radiofrequency energy, to destroy the area between the upper and lower heart chambers. This area is called the atrioventricular node.
Sham Comparator: Control arm
Pharmacologic treatment optimized according to guidelines in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation refractory or intolerant to drug therapy or catheter ablation.

Pharmacologic therapy includes rate control with beta-blockers (e.g., bisoprolol), calcium channel blockers (e.g., diltiazem), or antiarrhythmic drugs (e.g., flecainide, propafenone, dronedarone, amiodarone) along with anticoagulation therapy (e.g., apixaban) as per current clinical guidelines (e.g., ESC 2024 or ACC/AHA/HRS 2023) in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation refractory or intolerant to drug therapy or catheter ablation.

Treatment is tailored based on patient tolerance and clinical efficacy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in NT-proBNP concentration (pg/ml) from baseline to 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: 6 months after intervention.
6 months after intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in NT-proBNP concentration (pg/ml) at 12, and 24 months
Time Frame: 12 months and 24 months after intervention.
12 months and 24 months after intervention.
Change in health-related quality of life measured by 36-item short form survey (SF-36) questionnaire at 6, 12, 24 months
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
The SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.
6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
Change in health-related quality of life measured by EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) at 6, 12, 24 months
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.

The EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) evaluates health-related quality of life using a descriptive system with five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Scores are derived as an index value (range: -0.594 to 1)

The value attached to an EQ-5D profile according to a set of weights that reflect, on average, people's preferences about how good or bad the state is. Values are anchored at 1 (full health) and 0 (a state as bad as being dead) as required by their use in economic evaluation. Values less than 0 represent health states regarded as worse than a state that is as bad as being dead. An EQ-5D value is also sometimes known as an 'index', 'score' or 'utility'

6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF, %) at 6, 12, and 24 months
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention
6, 12 and 24 months after intervention
Change in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD, mm) at 6, 12, and 24 months
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
Change in left ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD, mm) at 6, 12, and 24 months
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at 6, 12, and 24 months
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
The NYHA functional classification system assesses the severity of heart failure symptoms on a scale from Class I (best) to Class IV (worst). Changes in functional class will be evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 months after the intervention to determine the impact on patients' physical activity and symptom burden.
6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
Change in 6 min walk test at 6, 12, and 24 months
Time Frame: 6, 12, and 24 months after intervention
6, 12, and 24 months after intervention
Change in cognitive function measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score at 6, 12, and 24 months
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely used cognitive screening tool that assesses various cognitive domains, including memory, attention, language, visuospatial skills, and executive function. The MoCA score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. A score of 26 or above is generally considered normal, while lower scores suggest cognitive impairment. Changes in MoCA scores will be evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 months post-intervention.
6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
Procedure-related complications (tamponade, device infection, re-intervention, pneumothorax, vascular complications, others)
Time Frame: 24 months after intervention.
24 months after intervention.
The all-cause mortality at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months after intervention.
Death from any cause during the 24-month follow-up period.
24 months after intervention.
Worsening Heart Failure (HF) at 24 Months
Time Frame: 24 months after intervention.
*Worsening HF with or without hospitalization: symptoms, signs, imaging, and analytical criteria that require unplanned medical attention with an increase of diuretic use, intravenous diuretic therapy
24 months after intervention.
Composite Outcome: Mortality and worsening heart failure (HF) at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months after intervention.
Participants meeting at least one of the criteria: (a) all-cause mortality, (b) worsening heart failure.
24 months after intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 27, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Clinical Trials on Pacemaker implantation with Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP)

Subscribe