- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06700733
PEEK Vs Titanium for All-on-4 Prosthesis
January 5, 2025 updated by: Khloud Ezzat, Mansoura University
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Versus Titanium Frameworks for All-on-4 Implant Full-arch Prosthesis: Within-patient Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction, Oral Health-related Quality of Life (OHRQoL), Chewing Efficiency and Maximum Bite Force
This crossover clinical study will examine the impact of the framework material of implant-supported prostheses on patient satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) with mandibular All-on-4 implant distribution.
The trial will investigate subject satisfaction, OHRQoL as the primary outcome, and chewing efficiency and maximum bite force as secondary outcomes for different framework materials used in implant-supported screw-retained restorations.
The first null hypothesis states no significant difference in patient satisfaction and OHRQoL between the tested prostheses.
Additionally, the second null hypothesis states no significant difference in chewing efficiency and maximum bite force between the tested prostheses.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Prosthetic steps
- For each patient, an abutment-level impression will be made, and the resultant cast will be 3D scanned for CAD/CAM construction of a PEEK superstructure with abutments.
- A verification jig will be constructed to ensure the accuracy of the cast.
- The final prosthesis will be virtually planned by using the Exo-Cad software.
- The final prosthesis will be milled in Duralay polymerized resin disk, and the prosthesis resin pattern will be tried intra-orally for passive fit using a screw test.
- For the PP, The PEEK framework will be constructed, the fit of the PEEK framework will be verified intraorally, and the final screw-retained prosthesis will be constructed of PMMA teeth and a visiolign pink composite estimating the gingival tissue.
- For the TP, the framework will be milled from Ti blocks according to the virtual design of the final prosthesis framework. PMMA teeth then will be cemented, and the final prosthesis will be screwed.
Evaluation
- Patient satisfaction (VAS) Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using a questionnaire based on a visual analog scale (VAS).(21) Patients will be asked to mark their answer (amount of satisfaction) on a 100-mm line (with zero referring to not satisfied at all and 100 referring to completely satisfied). The mean of the answers (length of the lines from zero to the marks in mm) for each question was subjected to statistical analysis.
- Oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14) The oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire was used to measure OHRQoL. The full OHIP questionnaire consisted of 49 items covering seven main domains: functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, and social disability. The OHIP-14 questionnaires were translated into Arabic by linguistic professionals who worked in collaboration with the authors to prepare the final version.
- Evaluation of masticatory efficiency: Chewing efficiency will be evaluated using the color mixing ability test.
- Evaluation of maximum bite force (BF): A digital BF transducer will be used to evaluate maximum BF in Newton (N).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
18
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Mansoura, Egypt, 54790
- Khloud Ezzat
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
The inclusion criteria include
- healthy male patients free from systemic diseases that may affect bone health, such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus and osteoporosis.
- implants placed with the All-on-4 concept in the mandible.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The exclusion criteria: the patients with a history of parafunctional habits (bruxism and clenching), smoking, and alcoholism
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: study group
The first 9 patients will receive the PEEK prosthesis (PP) first.
After 3 months, chewing efficiency, maximum bite force, patient satisfaction, and OHRQoL will be measured, and PP will be replaced by a Titanium prosthesis (TP).
After another 3 months, the measurements will be repeated.
|
For the PP, The PEEK framework will be constructed, the fit of the PEEK framework will be verified intraorally, and the final screw-retained prosthesis will be constructed of PMMA teeth and a visiolign pink composite estimating the gingival tissue.
Other Names:
For the TP, the framework will be milled from Ti blocks according to the virtual design of the final prosthesis framework.
PMMA teeth then will be cemented, and the final prosthesis will be screwed.
|
|
Experimental: study group 1
The second 9 patients will receive TP first, and after 3 months, measurements will be made.
Then, TP was replaced by PP, and measurements will be repeated after another 3 months.
This randomization will be made to reduce the effect of prosthesis type and bias
|
For the PP, The PEEK framework will be constructed, the fit of the PEEK framework will be verified intraorally, and the final screw-retained prosthesis will be constructed of PMMA teeth and a visiolign pink composite estimating the gingival tissue.
Other Names:
For the TP, the framework will be milled from Ti blocks according to the virtual design of the final prosthesis framework.
PMMA teeth then will be cemented, and the final prosthesis will be screwed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 month
|
Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using a questionnaire based on a visual analog scale
|
3 month
|
|
chewing efficiency
Time Frame: 3 month
|
Chewing efficiency will be evaluated using the color mixing ability test
|
3 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL)
Time Frame: 3 month
|
The oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire was used to measure OHRQoL.
|
3 month
|
|
maximum bite force (BF)
Time Frame: 3 month
|
A digital BF transducer will be used to evaluate maximum BF in Newton (N)
|
3 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Khloud Ezzat, PhD, lecturer
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 23, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
March 12, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 20, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
November 22, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 5, 2025
Last Verified
November 1, 2024
More Information
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Satisfaction, Patient
-
Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research...CompletedSatisfaction, Patient | SatisfactionPakistan
-
Duke UniversityCompletedPatient Satisfaction | Clinician SatisfactionUnited States
-
Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselWithdrawnPatient Satisfaction | Patient PreferenceBelgium
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterTerminated
-
HaEmek Medical Center, IsraelUnknownPatient Satisfaction | Patient Compliance
-
University Hospital, ToulouseCompletedSatisfaction, PatientFrance
-
Acibadem UniversityCompletedPatient Satisfaction | Patient Relations, NurseTurkey
-
Methodist Health SystemCompletedSatisfaction, PatientUnited States
-
University of AarhusAarhus University HospitalCompletedPatient Satisfaction | Patient-Centered CareDenmark
-
Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training...CompletedPatient Satisfaction | Bowel Preparation | Patient ExperienceTurkey
Clinical Trials on PEEK prosthesis
-
Malo ClinicInvibio LtdTerminatedProsthesis SurvivalPortugal
-
Malo ClinicInvibio LtdTerminatedProsthesis SurvivalPortugal
-
Malo ClinicInvibio LtdEnrolling by invitationProsthesis SurvivalPortugal
-
Malo ClinicInvibio LtdTerminated
-
Malo ClinicInvibio LtdActive, not recruiting
-
RenJi HospitalSuzhou SinoMed Biomaterials Co., LtdActive, not recruitingOsteoarthritis of the Knee | Rheumatoid Arthritis of KneeChina
-
Menoufia UniversityMansoura UniversityRecruiting
-
Cairo UniversityActive, not recruitingProsthesis | Bone Loss, Alveolar | Prosthodontics | Implants, DentalEgypt
-
Malo ClinicCompletedDental Implants | Prosthesis Survival | Mandible | Dental MaterialsPortugal
-
Mansoura UniversityCompleted