A Comparative Study to Evaluate a Novel Algorithm As a Diagnostic Aid for ADHD in Youth Ages 6-17.

December 6, 2024 updated by: MindTension

A Prospective Comparative Study to Evaluate a Novel Algorithm Using Data Derived from a Non-Invasive Digital Biomarker As a Diagnostic Aid for ADHD in Youth Ages 6-17.

This study aims to demonstrate the accuracy of the MT1 algorithm using the MindTension biometric sensor device as a diagnostic aid for healthcare providers in diagnosing ADHD in youth ages ≥ 6 to ≤17 years.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study aims to demonstrate the accuracy of the MT1 algorithm. The output of the MT1 algorithm will be compared to a Gold Standard clinical diagnosis made by specialist clinician diagnosis supported by the Kiddie SADS Present and Lifetime semi-structured interview (K-SADS-PL) and norm-referenced measures of current ADHD symptom frequency and severity using the ADHD-RS-5 rating scale. Diagnosis will be scaled according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders- 5 (DSM-5) criteria, and made with agreement between two licensed specialists in ADHD (a Clinical Psychologist and a Psychiatrist).

Further to the above, demonstrate that the agreement between the MT1 output and the specialist clinician diagnosis will be non-inferior to the level of agreement between the clinician diagnosis with the Test of Visual Attention (TOVA) FDA cleared device.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Recruiting
        • Icahn School Of Medicine At Mount Sinai
        • Contact:
          • Beth Krone Clinical Psychologist, PhD., MS
          • Phone Number: 212 241 8012
          • Email: beth.krone@mssm.edu
        • Contact:
          • Jeffrey Newcorn Director Division of ADHD and Learning Disorders; Director Ped, MD Professor
        • Contact:
          • Beth Krone Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, PhD., MS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Parent provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  2. Child stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  3. Any gender, aged 6 to 17 years
  4. Stimulant naïve or willing to wash out of stimulant for 3 days (approximately 72 hours) prior to testing with biometric and performance devices (MindTension + TOVA)
  5. ADHD Group: Diagnosed with symptoms consistent with ADHD as determined by Mini Kid + an ADHD-RS score of 1.5SD above mean for age and sex
  6. Control group: No diagnosable disorder on the Mini kid, and an ADHD-RS score within 1SD of the mean for age and sex.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current use of psychotropic medications that cannot be washed out in 3 days (approximately 72 hours)
  2. Known current seizure disorder (history of febrile seizure allowed).
  3. Presence of specific devices (e.g., cardiac pacemaker) that may interfere with the MindTension monitor
  4. IQ<70 by clinician judgment
  5. Meeting FULL criteria for current PTSD, GAD, MDD, or any lifetime diagnosis of ASD, Bipolar disorder, or psychotic disorder that was, in the opinion of the investigator, correctly obtained. May have symptoms of anxiety or dysthymia/depression not meeting criteria for a full disorder, or disorders such as simple phobia
  6. Deaf or hearing impaired, since this will make it difficult to hear and respond to the auditory stimuli.
  7. Inability to complete the assessments.
  8. Any other concerns in the judgment of the PI.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ADHD group
Subjects will be evaluated for ADHD using clinically established reference standard interviews and psychometric tools with demonstrated validity, including the K-SADS and ADHD-RS-5, in accordance with DSM-5 criteria. IQ will be estimated using two subtests of the WASI.
Objective measurements of attention and inhibition.
Objective measurements of attention and inhibitory control.
Experimental: Non-ADHD group
Subjects will be evaluated using clinically established reference standard interviews and psychometric tools with demonstrated validity, including the K-SADS and ADHD-RS-5, in accordance with DSM-5 criteria. IQ will be estimated using two subtests of the WASI.
Objective measurements of attention and inhibition.
Objective measurements of attention and inhibitory control.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Agreement Rate (OAR) - probability that the test will be normal and the condition is normal or positive and the condition is positive, out of all subjects.
Time Frame: From the beginning of clinical assessment until the end of testing (approximately 1-2 days).

The outcome measure will be calculated by using the following formula:

Over All Agreement = (True Positive + True Negative) / (True Positive + True Negative + False Positive + False Negative) X 100.

From the beginning of clinical assessment until the end of testing (approximately 1-2 days).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive Predicted Value (PPV) - conditional probability that the condition will be positive if the test is positive.
Time Frame: From the beginning of clinical assessment until the end of testing (approximately 1-2 days).

The outcome measure will be calculated using the following formula:

Positive Predicted Value = (True Positive) / (True Positive + False Positive) X 100

From the beginning of clinical assessment until the end of testing (approximately 1-2 days).
Negative Predicted Value (NPV) - conditional probability that the condition will be normal if the test is normal.
Time Frame: From the beginning of clinical assessment until the end of testing (approximately 1-2 days).

The outcome measure will be calculated using the following formula:

Negative Predicted Value = (True Negative) / (True Negative + False Negative) X 100

From the beginning of clinical assessment until the end of testing (approximately 1-2 days).
Sensitivity - conditional probability that the test will be positive if the condition is positive.
Time Frame: From the beginning of clinical assessment until the end of testing (approximately 1-2 days).

The outcome measure will be calculated using the following formula:

Sensitivity = (True Positive) / (True Positive + False Negative) X 100

From the beginning of clinical assessment until the end of testing (approximately 1-2 days).
Specificity - conditional probability that the test will be normal if the condition is normal.
Time Frame: From the beginning of clinical assessment until the end of testing (approximately 1-2 days).

The outcome measure will be calculated using the following formula:

Specificity = (True Negative) / (True Negative + False Positive) X 100

From the beginning of clinical assessment until the end of testing (approximately 1-2 days).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey Newcorn, MD Professor, Director, Division of ADHD and Learning Disorders Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

December 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-0000

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ADHD

Clinical Trials on MT1 Auditory startle response patterns analysis algorithm

Subscribe