Perioperative ACT for Preventing CPSP (PREPS)

April 27, 2026 updated by: Samantha Meints

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Single-session Perioperative Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) Workshop for Preventing Chronic Postsurgical Pain: A Single-arm, Non-randomized Pilot Trial

The present study aims to adapt and modify a brief perioperative Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention aimed at preventing the transition to Chronic Post-Surgical Pain (CPSP) and reducing long-term opioid use. Investigators will assess the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of the intervention via a non-randomized, non-controlled pilot trial.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States, 01467
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • scheduled to undergo fusion, discectomy, vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, or foraminotomy
  • age 22 and older
  • able to communicate fluently in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to complete study procedures due to delirium, dementia, psychosis, or other cognitive impairment
  • have a history of severe neurologic movement disorder
  • are pregnant or intent to become pregnant during study
  • have undergone previous spinal surgery
  • have spinal deformity, pseudarthrosis, trauma, infection, or tumor as primary indication for surgery
  • have undergone Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in last 2 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Perioperative Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Workshop
Participants assigned to this arm will complete a 1-day ACT workshop followed by a telephone booster after surgery
One day workshop + telephone booster

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment helpfulness (THQ)
Time Frame: Immediately following the ACT workshop
Item assesses the perceived helpfulness of the ACT workshop and is rated from -5 (extremely harmful) to 5 (extremely helpful).
Immediately following the ACT workshop

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment Helpfulness (THQ)
Time Frame: 1 month post-op
Item assesses the perceived helpfulness of the ACT workshop and is rated from -5 (extremely harmful) to 5 (extremely helpful).
1 month post-op
Treatment Credibility
Time Frame: immediately following ACT workshop
Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ); 3 items are rated to indicate the logic, success, and confidence in the treatment. Scores are summed with a range from 3-27 where higher scores indicating greater treatment credibility
immediately following ACT workshop
Treatment Expectancy
Time Frame: immediately following ACT workshop
Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ); 3 items are used to assess the likelihood of the success of the therapy to reduce pain and improve function. Scores are summed with a range from 0-29 where higher scores indicate greater expectancy for beneficial treatment outcomes
immediately following ACT workshop
Pain Interference
Time Frame: 1 month post-op
Assesses how much a person's pain impacts their daily activities, including general activity, mood, walking, work, relationships with others, enjoyment of life, and sleep, with higher scores indicating greater interference with daily functioning due to pain. Each of the seven domains is rated on a scale from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference), and the average score across these domains represents the overall pain interference level.
1 month post-op
Pain Interference
Time Frame: 3 months post-op
The Brief Pain Inventory assesses how much a person's pain impacts their daily activities, including general activity, mood, walking, work, relationships with others, enjoyment of life, and sleep, with higher scores indicating greater interference with daily functioning due to pain. Each of the seven domains is rated on a scale from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference), and the average score across these domains represents the overall pain interference level.
3 months post-op
Pain Interference
Time Frame: 6 months post-op
The Brief Pain Inventory assesses how much a person's pain impacts their daily activities, including general activity, mood, walking, work, relationships with others, enjoyment of life, and sleep, with higher scores indicating greater interference with daily functioning due to pain. Each of the seven domains is rated on a scale from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference), and the average score across these domains represents the overall pain interference level.
6 months post-op
Pain Severity
Time Frame: 1 month post-op
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) measures pain severity by asking patients to rate their "worst pain" on a scale from 0 to 10, where a higher score indicates greater pain intensity
1 month post-op
Pain Severity
Time Frame: 3 months post-op
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) measures pain severity by asking patients to rate their "worst pain" on a scale from 0 to 10, where a higher score indicates greater pain intensity
3 months post-op
Pain Severity
Time Frame: 6 months post-op
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) measures pain severity by asking patients to rate their "worst pain" on a scale from 0 to 10, where a higher score indicates greater pain intensity
6 months post-op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified data will be shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Upon publication of the primary study manuscript

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Reasonable requests from IPD will be reviewed and granted by the study PI.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Subscribe