Intensive Music Therapy on Cognitive Function in Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation in Malaysia

April 27, 2026 updated by: Dr. Beh Wen Fen, University of Malaya

Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial of Intensive Music Therapy on Cognitive Function in Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation in Malaysia

The purpose of this study is to explore whether intensive music therapy can help improve cognitive functions like memory, attention, and decision-making skills in stroke patients who are undergoing rehabilitation.

This is a feasibility study, meaning it's also designed to see how practical it is to include music therapy as part of stroke rehabilitation. The investigators want to learn how well patients can participate in and stick with this type of therapy, and whether it fits well with other treatments that stroke patients usually receive. By understanding this, the investigators can assess the resources, staff training, and planning needed for music therapy to be part of stroke recovery in the future.

The study will also help the investigators estimate the effects of music therapy, which will be used to design a larger, more detailed study in the future.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will be a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) in one centre, with two parallel groups: an intervention group receiving intensive music therapy in addition to standard neurorehabilitation, and a control group receiving only standard neurorehabilitation. A certified music therapist will conduct the intervention and a trained assessor will evaluate the outcome. The assessor is blinded to the patients' allocation group and will evaluate the cognitive outcomes at baseline, at two weeks (after 8 sessions) and at 1 month post intervention. All patients whoare admitted to the rehabilitation ward for stroke rehabilitation will be screened and approached. Informed consent will be obtained from eligible patients before randomisation. To ensure that there are exactly 15 patients in both the control and intervention groups, block randomization will be used using a random number generator. After randomization, the group assignments will be kept in a password-protected file that only the study coordinator can access. The assessor will not have access to this information because the patients will be labelled with anonymous codes that do not reveal whether they are in the control or intervention group. The assessor will only know the code, not the group assignment, ensuring unbiased evaluation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: NIK SHERINA HAIDI BT HANAFI PROF, MBBS
  • Phone Number: +60379492802
  • Email: niksherina@um.edu.my

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke confirmed by CT scan
  • Duration of stroke within the first 3 months
  • Aged 18 - 75 years old
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Understands Bahasa Melayu or English with basic communication abilities to follow instructions during therapy sessions
  • Mild to moderate cognitive impairments with MoCA score of 10-25.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe aphasia
  • Significant uncorrected hearing or visual impairments preventing engagement in music therapy.
  • Severe or unstable medical conditions (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes).
  • Medications that significantly impair cognition or motor function (e.g., high dose sedatives).
  • History of neurological diseases other than stroke (eg, Parkinson's disease).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Care group
In the control group, participants will receive the standard neurorehabilitation program prescribed by the rehabilitation team, without the addition of music therapy. This will provide a baseline to compare outcomes with the intervention group and evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effects of the music therapy intervention. The usual cognitive rehabilitation program during the subacute stroke period focuses on restoring cognitive abilities such as attention, memory, executive functions, and communication. The control group's daily rehabilitation sessions will last for 45 minutes, mirroring the music therapy group's session duration, ensuring a fair comparison of outcomes across both groups. This comparison will help assess the unique contributions of music therapy on cognitive functions like attention, memory, and executive functions in stroke patients.
In the control group, participants will receive the standard neurorehabilitation program prescribed by the rehabilitation team, without the addition of music therapy. This will provide a baseline to compare outcomes with the intervention group and evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effects of the music therapy intervention. The usual cognitive rehabilitation program during the subacute stroke period focuses on restoring cognitive abilities such as attention, memory, executive functions, and communication. The control group's daily rehabilitation sessions will last for 45 minutes, mirroring the music therapy group's session duration, ensuring a fair comparison of outcomes across both groups. This comparison will help assess the unique contributions of music therapy on cognitive functions like attention, memory, and executive functions in stroke patients.
Experimental: Music Therapy Group
The music therapy session described follows a structured and engaging approach, aimed at enhancing the patient's cognitive skills during neurorehabilitation. Here's a summary of the session components: Relaxation Phase, Song Selection, Instrument Selection and Familiarization, Rhythmic Training, Progression and Adjustment, Session Frequency and Customization. This individualized approach aims to enhance patient engagement and recovery by integrating music, rhythm, and therapeutic interaction into the neurorehabilitation process.
The music therapy session described follows a structured and engaging approach, aimed at enhancing the patient's cognitive skills during neurorehabilitation. Here's a summary of the session components: Relaxation Phase, Song Selection, Instrument Selection and Familiarization, Rhythmic Training, Progression and Adjustment, Session Frequency and Customization. This individualized approach aims to enhance patient engagement and recovery by integrating music, rhythm, and therapeutic interaction into the neurorehabilitation process.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: This will be assessed at baseline, after completion of 8 sessions, an average of 2 weeks and also at 1 month after completion.
is noteworthy for being greater sensitivity than the other test and can detect more mild deficits
This will be assessed at baseline, after completion of 8 sessions, an average of 2 weeks and also at 1 month after completion.
Trail Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: This will be assessed at baseline, after completion of 8 sessions, an average of 2 weeks and also at 1 month after completion.
is easy to understand, and has a short administration which assesses visuoperceptual tracking, processing speed, divided attention, and cognitive flexibility.
This will be assessed at baseline, after completion of 8 sessions, an average of 2 weeks and also at 1 month after completion.
Digit Span (Forward and Backward)
Time Frame: This will be assessed at baseline, after completion of 8 sessions, an average of 2 weeks and also at 1 month after completion.
is easy to implement, requires minimal training needs, and measures selective attention and cognitive interference
This will be assessed at baseline, after completion of 8 sessions, an average of 2 weeks and also at 1 month after completion.
Clock Drawing Test (CDT)
Time Frame: This will be assessed at baseline, after completion of 8 sessions, an average of 2 weeks and also at 1 month after completion.
is a screening test for cognitive dysfunction secondary to dementia, delirium, or a range of neurological and psychiatric illnesses
This will be assessed at baseline, after completion of 8 sessions, an average of 2 weeks and also at 1 month after completion.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

For confidentiality purposes.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Standard Care (in control arm)

Subscribe