Statins in Frail Older Patients with Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack - the Prospective Cohort Study (SAFEST-coh)

January 19, 2025 updated by: Prof. dr. Nathalie van der Velde, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

StAtins in Frail OldEr Patients with Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack - the Prospective Cohort Study

Two Dutch guidelines (Stroke and Cardiovascular Risk Management) provide conflicting advice on optimal statin treatment in older patients. In the SAFEST-cohort, the investigators will assess the impact of continuing versus discontinuing a statin in frail individuals aged 70 and above with a recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) on their health-related quality of life and MACE free survival during a two-year follow-up period.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The stroke incidence strongly increases with age.Many of the older individuals that suffered a stroke will have to live with stroke sequelae and will need lifelong care, either at home or in a nursing facility.

Hence, secondary prevention strategies are of the highest importance. Statins are used for the prevention of subsequent cardiovascular events in ischemic stroke and TIA patients. The efficacy of statin therapy has been firmly established in middle-aged stroke patients. However, despite the high prevalence of stroke in older people, the evidence for the efficacy of statin therapy in older individuals that suffered an ischemic stroke or TIA is sparse. This primarily arises from the underrepresentation of older patients in statin trials.

In a recent meta-analysis, it was found that in people aged 70 and above, statin use lowered the annual incidence of major vascular events with approximately one percent. However, the trials in this meta-analysis mostly included fit, non-frail older adults.

Frailty is a geriatric condition characterized by an increased vulnerability to external stressors, linked to adverse outcomes, including premature mortality. A considerable proportion of the older population is frail. However, since trials that include older individuals often focus on fit, non-frail older adults, there is currently no evidence for the most effective treatment strategy in the frail older group.

While it might be tempting to extrapolate the benefits of statin therapy from younger patients to frail older patients, it is vital to acknowledge the considerable disparities between these groups. Firstly, frail older stroke survivors may not have a life-expectancy longer than the time to benefit. Secondly, due to the high percentage of polypharmacy in frail older people, this patient group has a higher risk for the occurrence of drug-drug interactions and adverse effects, which have the ability to significantly affect the quality of life.

The limited body of evidence regarding the effectiveness of statins in the older population, combined with their higher susceptibility to side effects and drug interactions, results in uncertainty for patients as well as for doctors and policymakers when deciding how to treat this patient group.This uncertainty is clearly reflected in the two Dutch guidelines ("Herseninfarct en Hersenbloeding" and "Cardiovascular Risk Management (CVRM)" respectively), providing conflicting advice on optimal statin treatment in older patients.

The investigators hypothesize that in frail older patients with a recent ischemic stroke or TIA, discontinuing statins will increase health-related quality of life (HrQoL) without a substantial decrease in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) free survival, which includes cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or nonfatal stroke.

In this prospective cohort study, no intervention will be implemented. Participants will be followed for two years (and for the patients included in the first years of the inclusion period - three). During this time, data is collected including questionnaires on quality of life, occurrence of MACE or falls, and possible changes in statin treatment.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Almere, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Flevoziekenhuis
        • Contact:
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
        • Contact:
      • Eindhoven, Netherlands
      • Zwolle, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Isala Klinieken
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

frail individuals aged 70 and above with a recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age = 70 years or older at the time of ischemic stroke or TIA;
  • inclusion within 6 weeks after diagnosis of ischemic stroke or TIA;
  • already using statin therapy at the time of the index event;
  • frailty as defined by a pre-event score of 4-7 and/or post-event score of 6-7 on the validated Clinical Frailty Scale.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous serious adverse drug reactions (defined as an adverse reaction that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisa-tion, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a birth defect32) to statins or other contraindications to statin use.
  • Very severe frailty or very limited life expectancy (< 6 months) as defined by a score >= 8 points on the validated Clinical Frailty Scale.
  • Inability to communicate in Dutch.
  • Inability to respond to questions, either independently or with the assistance of a proxy.
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide written informed consent, either independently or with the assistance of a proxy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Statin continued
Patients in which the statin was continued after the index event
Statin use
Other Names:
  • atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin, fluvastatin
Statin discontinued
Patients in which the statin was discontinued after the index event

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-Related Quality of Life (HrQoL)
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 (and 36) months

This will be measured using the PROMIS-10 scale scores (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health), including global mental health and global physical health subscales. Measurements at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 (and 36) months.

months.

3, 6, 12, 18, 24 (and 36) months
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) free survival
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 (and 36) months

Classical 3-point MACE (cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke) and non-cardiovascular death.

Measurements at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 (and 36) months.

3, 6, 12, 18, 24 (and 36) months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional outcome
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
This will be assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), with scores ranging from 0 to 6 (lower scores indicating better function).
3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Cognition
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
This will be measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) with scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 30 (best) or the Telephone version of the MoCA (TMoCA) with scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 22 (best)
3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Number of falls
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Falls, measured using the falls calender. Participant returns the fall calender every 3 months.
3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Time to first fall
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Falls, measured using the falls calender. Participant returns the fall calender every 3 months.
3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
General quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
General QoL, measured by the EuroQol Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), with scores ranging from 0-100, the higher, the better.
3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Societal costs
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Societal costs measured by The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey - Minimum Data Set (TOPICS-MDS) (questions 23 - 37)
3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Cardiovascular risk status
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
This will be assessed by collecting vital signs (height, weight, and blood pressure) and lipid levels. The exact way how to combine these factors into one risk status will be determined.
3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Renske van den Berg-Vos, Prof. dr., Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Principal Investigator: Nathalie van der Velde, Prof. dr., Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The SAFEST database can be requested by other researchers. These requests will be reviewed according the requirements for sharing SAFEST data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After data-collection/analysis.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requirements for sharing SAFEST data include:

  • privacy laws of the Netherlands, policy of NFU and AmsterdamUMC must be followed
  • data will be anonymously shared
  • data can only be used to study the research question for which participants signed the ICF
  • data will not be shared for commercial purposes.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemic Stroke

Clinical Trials on Statin

Subscribe