- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06787846
EFFICACY and TOLERABILITY of TESTED FORMULA VS. HYDROQUINONE 4% in the TREATMENT of FACIAL MELASMA
EVALUATION of the EFFICACY and TOLERABILITY of TESTED FORMULA VS. HYDROQUINONE 4% in the TREATMENT of FACIAL MELASMA OVER 3 MONTHS
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Topical treatments are usually used first line. Among a high number of molecules claiming a depigmenting effect, hydroquinone used at various concentrations (typically 2 to 5%) is the most widely used skin depigmenting product and is considered, up to now, the gold standard when used at 4-5%.
Hydroquinone is sometimes combined in the Kligman's trio, with topical tretinoin and topical steroids, which remains the best initial treatment for melasma in terms of efficacy.
This randomized , two-arm study is carried out with a new cosmetic formulation developed with the aim of acting on facial hyperpigmentation.
This clinical trial is conducted in accordance with the protocol, the HELSINKI declaration (1964) and subsequent amendments, and/or the International Council on Harmonization (ICH) Good Clinical Practices (GCP)/ and in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements.
Statistical Analysis:
- Primary Efficacy Analysis: The primary performance endpoint is the difference between tested formula facial serum (2039125 03) versus hydroquinone 4% in mean change from baseline in modified Melasma Area Severity Index (mMASI) score at D84. A non-inferiority followed by a superiority evaluation will be assessed.
- Sensitivity analyses The same analysis will be repeated on the FAS population. Missing values (i.e. data of patients who dropped out the study or with no evaluable data) will not be imputed for this analysis.
Depending on the results of the baseline characteristics description, other sensitivity analyses could be performed by adding other relevant baseline covariables to the model.
. Safety Analysis: no statistical analysis will be performed on safety. The data are presented descriptively.
Categorical data are summarized using the number and percentage of patients in each category. Continuous data are summarized using the arithmetic mean, Standard Deviation (SD), Q1, Q3, minimum, median and maximum values.
Regarding the sample size determination, there was no formal calculation. A number of 104 patients , 52 patients in each group was considered sufficient to meet the study objective.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- CIDP
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women;
- Adults (over 18 y.o.) (preference 18-50 y.o.);
- Phototypes I to IV;
- Melasma epidermal or mixed (exclude dermal melasma);
- Ready to protect as much as possible from the sun for the duration of the study;
- Ready to avoid contraindicated products (irritants, other depigmenting agents);
- Participants demonstrating understanding of the study procedures, restrictions, and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and having received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria
- Subjects with dermal melasma (wood lamp at inclusion);
- Subjects who has already use of hydroquinone 4% in the past year;
- Subjects with stable hormonal therapy (contraceptive ou THS) for at least 6 months;
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women or pregnancy plans;
- Subjects applying irritants (such as peeling, acid..) (2 weeks wash out);
- Subjects under active treatment of melasma (including topicals or procedures) within the last 2 weeks;
- Subjects using drugs that can induce melasma such as antiepileptics (1 month wash out);
- Subjects using other products claiming a depigmenting activity (1 month wash out);
- Subjects with other dermatosis of the face or known photosensitivity;
- All types of topical treatment applied to the face (wash out of 2 weeks)
- Subjects without any facial procedure planned during the course of the study
- Subjects under phototherapy (1 month wash out)
- Subjects hypersensitivity to the products of the study
- Any history of significant dermatological/ophthalmological diseases or conditions or medical conditions known to alter skin appearance or physiologic response (e.g. diabetes,) which could, in the opinion of the Investigator, preclude topical application of the investigational products and/or interfere with the evaluation of the test site reaction
- Subjects currently using any medication, which in the opinion of the investigator, may affect the evaluation of the study product, or place the subject at undue risk.
- Previous history of atopy, allergic reactions, irritation or intense discomfort feelings to topical-use products, cosmetics, or medication
- Participation in another clinical study
- Employee of the sponsor or the study site
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group TP: Tested product
Subjects (aged over 18 years) with mild to severe facial epidermal or mixed melasma
|
Serum : Application full face, twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime for 4 months and application Tinted sunscreen SPF 50+, twice a day
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Group HQ: Hydroquinone 4%
Subjects (aged over 18 years) with mild to severe facial epidermal or mixed melasma
|
Cream : Application all over the face once a day (at bedtime) and Tinted sunscreen SPF 50+, twice a day
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in mMASI scoring
Time Frame: From baseline to 3months
|
The mMASI is calculated using 3 components: four regions of the face (forehead, right malar, left malar and chin); area of involvement for each region (using a scale from 0 to 6): darkness compared to the surrounding normal skin for each area (evaluated using a scale from 0 to 4).
|
From baseline to 3months
|
|
Evaluation of Global Tolerance
Time Frame: From 1month to 3 months
|
The investigator evaluates the tolerance using a 5-point skin reaction scale (0 represent No local intolerance ; 4 represent a Very severe signs or symptoms of intolerance)
|
From 1month to 3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Time Frame: From baseline to3 months
|
The investigator evaluates the severity of melasma using a 4-point scale (from 0 (cleared, almost cleared) to 3 (severe (markedly darker than the surrounding normal skin)).
|
From baseline to3 months
|
|
Change in Subject Global Assessment of Improvement (SGAI)
Time Frame: From 1month to 3 months
|
The subject evaluates the change on a 6-point scale from -1 (worsened) to 4 (totally cleared).
|
From 1month to 3 months
|
|
Change of Quality of life
Time Frame: From 1month to 3 months
|
Subjects evaluate about the impact of melasma on the quality of life.
On a scale of 1 (not bothered at all) to 7 (bothered all the time), the subject's rate how they feel.
MELAS Qol scores range from 7 to 70, with a higher score signifying worse quality of life.
|
From 1month to 3 months
|
|
Change of stigmatization evaluation
Time Frame: From 1month to 3 months
|
Subjects evaluate about the impact of melasma on stigmatization evaluation.
On a scale of 1 (not bothered at all) to 7 (bothered all the time), the subject's rate how they feel.
MELAS Qol scores range from 7 to 70, with a higher score signifying worse quality of life.
|
From 1month to 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Renato Moura, CIDP
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 21028 - Serum vs HQ4%
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Melasma
-
Foundation University IslamabadFauji Foundation HospitalNot yet recruitingMelasma | Melasma (Facial Melasma)Pakistan
-
Gujranwala medical college District Headquarters...CompletedMelasma | Melasma (Facial Melasma)Pakistan
-
Venus Research CenterEnrolling by invitationMelasma | Melasma (Facial Melasma)Egypt
-
Laboratoire Dermatologique ACMCIDP MauritiusRecruitingHealthy | Melasma (Facial Melasma) | Epidermal MelasmaMauritius
-
Pak Emirates Military HospitalCompletedMelasma (Facial Melasma)Pakistan
-
Hina MalikEnrolling by invitationMelasma (Facial Melasma)Pakistan
-
Kasr El Aini HospitalRecruitingMelasma | Facial MelasmaEgypt
-
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical...Recruiting
-
EgymedicalpediaAswan UniversityRecruiting
-
Mesoestetic Pharma Group S.L.Completed
Clinical Trials on Experimental: Group TP
-
Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Completed
-
Universitat Jaume IRecruitingAnxiety Disorders | Depressive DisordersSpain
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingAthletic Performance | Muscle StrengthPakistan
-
Suleyman Demirel UniversityCompletedOsteoporosis (Senile)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Finis Terrae UniversityNot yet recruitingPostoperative Pain | Respiratory ComplicationChile
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedEffects of Rhythmic Stabilization With and Without Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises Among Fast BowlersSports Physical TherapyPakistan
-
University of AlcalaRecruitingTo be Approved by the Ethics CommitteeSpain
-
Sahmyook UniversityNot yet recruitingStrokeKorea, Republic of
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Fear of Pain | Fear of InjuryUnited States