EFFICACY and TOLERABILITY of TESTED FORMULA VS. HYDROQUINONE 4% in the TREATMENT of FACIAL MELASMA

January 16, 2025 updated by: Cosmetique Active International

EVALUATION of the EFFICACY and TOLERABILITY of TESTED FORMULA VS. HYDROQUINONE 4% in the TREATMENT of FACIAL MELASMA OVER 3 MONTHS

This study aims at assessing the non-inferiority of tested formula facial serum (2039125 03) versus hydroquinone 4% over 3 months for treatment and then 3 months for maintenance ofwomen subjects presenting facial melasma.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Topical treatments are usually used first line. Among a high number of molecules claiming a depigmenting effect, hydroquinone used at various concentrations (typically 2 to 5%) is the most widely used skin depigmenting product and is considered, up to now, the gold standard when used at 4-5%.

Hydroquinone is sometimes combined in the Kligman's trio, with topical tretinoin and topical steroids, which remains the best initial treatment for melasma in terms of efficacy.

This randomized , two-arm study is carried out with a new cosmetic formulation developed with the aim of acting on facial hyperpigmentation.

This clinical trial is conducted in accordance with the protocol, the HELSINKI declaration (1964) and subsequent amendments, and/or the International Council on Harmonization (ICH) Good Clinical Practices (GCP)/ and in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements.

Statistical Analysis:

  • Primary Efficacy Analysis: The primary performance endpoint is the difference between tested formula facial serum (2039125 03) versus hydroquinone 4% in mean change from baseline in modified Melasma Area Severity Index (mMASI) score at D84. A non-inferiority followed by a superiority evaluation will be assessed.
  • Sensitivity analyses The same analysis will be repeated on the FAS population. Missing values (i.e. data of patients who dropped out the study or with no evaluable data) will not be imputed for this analysis.

Depending on the results of the baseline characteristics description, other sensitivity analyses could be performed by adding other relevant baseline covariables to the model.

. Safety Analysis: no statistical analysis will be performed on safety. The data are presented descriptively.

Categorical data are summarized using the number and percentage of patients in each category. Continuous data are summarized using the arithmetic mean, Standard Deviation (SD), Q1, Q3, minimum, median and maximum values.

Regarding the sample size determination, there was no formal calculation. A number of 104 patients , 52 patients in each group was considered sufficient to meet the study objective.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

109

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
        • CIDP

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Women;
  2. Adults (over 18 y.o.) (preference 18-50 y.o.);
  3. Phototypes I to IV;
  4. Melasma epidermal or mixed (exclude dermal melasma);
  5. Ready to protect as much as possible from the sun for the duration of the study;
  6. Ready to avoid contraindicated products (irritants, other depigmenting agents);
  7. Participants demonstrating understanding of the study procedures, restrictions, and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and having received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Subjects with dermal melasma (wood lamp at inclusion);
  2. Subjects who has already use of hydroquinone 4% in the past year;
  3. Subjects with stable hormonal therapy (contraceptive ou THS) for at least 6 months;
  4. Pregnant or breastfeeding women or pregnancy plans;
  5. Subjects applying irritants (such as peeling, acid..) (2 weeks wash out);
  6. Subjects under active treatment of melasma (including topicals or procedures) within the last 2 weeks;
  7. Subjects using drugs that can induce melasma such as antiepileptics (1 month wash out);
  8. Subjects using other products claiming a depigmenting activity (1 month wash out);
  9. Subjects with other dermatosis of the face or known photosensitivity;
  10. All types of topical treatment applied to the face (wash out of 2 weeks)
  11. Subjects without any facial procedure planned during the course of the study
  12. Subjects under phototherapy (1 month wash out)
  13. Subjects hypersensitivity to the products of the study
  14. Any history of significant dermatological/ophthalmological diseases or conditions or medical conditions known to alter skin appearance or physiologic response (e.g. diabetes,) which could, in the opinion of the Investigator, preclude topical application of the investigational products and/or interfere with the evaluation of the test site reaction
  15. Subjects currently using any medication, which in the opinion of the investigator, may affect the evaluation of the study product, or place the subject at undue risk.
  16. Previous history of atopy, allergic reactions, irritation or intense discomfort feelings to topical-use products, cosmetics, or medication
  17. Participation in another clinical study
  18. Employee of the sponsor or the study site

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group TP: Tested product
Subjects (aged over 18 years) with mild to severe facial epidermal or mixed melasma
Serum : Application full face, twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime for 4 months and application Tinted sunscreen SPF 50+, twice a day
Other Names:
  • Tested Product
Active Comparator: Group HQ: Hydroquinone 4%
Subjects (aged over 18 years) with mild to severe facial epidermal or mixed melasma
Cream : Application all over the face once a day (at bedtime) and Tinted sunscreen SPF 50+, twice a day
Other Names:
  • Hydroquinone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in mMASI scoring
Time Frame: From baseline to 3months
The mMASI is calculated using 3 components: four regions of the face (forehead, right malar, left malar and chin); area of involvement for each region (using a scale from 0 to 6): darkness compared to the surrounding normal skin for each area (evaluated using a scale from 0 to 4).
From baseline to 3months
Evaluation of Global Tolerance
Time Frame: From 1month to 3 months
The investigator evaluates the tolerance using a 5-point skin reaction scale (0 represent No local intolerance ; 4 represent a Very severe signs or symptoms of intolerance)
From 1month to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Time Frame: From baseline to3 months
The investigator evaluates the severity of melasma using a 4-point scale (from 0 (cleared, almost cleared) to 3 (severe (markedly darker than the surrounding normal skin)).
From baseline to3 months
Change in Subject Global Assessment of Improvement (SGAI)
Time Frame: From 1month to 3 months
The subject evaluates the change on a 6-point scale from -1 (worsened) to 4 (totally cleared).
From 1month to 3 months
Change of Quality of life
Time Frame: From 1month to 3 months
Subjects evaluate about the impact of melasma on the quality of life. On a scale of 1 (not bothered at all) to 7 (bothered all the time), the subject's rate how they feel. MELAS Qol scores range from 7 to 70, with a higher score signifying worse quality of life.
From 1month to 3 months
Change of stigmatization evaluation
Time Frame: From 1month to 3 months
Subjects evaluate about the impact of melasma on stigmatization evaluation. On a scale of 1 (not bothered at all) to 7 (bothered all the time), the subject's rate how they feel. MELAS Qol scores range from 7 to 70, with a higher score signifying worse quality of life.
From 1month to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Renato Moura, CIDP

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 17, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Melasma

Clinical Trials on Experimental: Group TP

Subscribe