Comparisons of Phasic and Terminal DO

February 5, 2025 updated by: National Taiwan University Clinical Trial Center, National Taiwan University Hospital

Comparisons of Phasic and Terminal Detrusor Overactivity in Women with Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction

Overactive bladder is a common issue among women of childbearing age, regardless of their childbirth experience. Some of these women may exhibit detrusor overactivity in urodynamic studies. Excluding detrusor overactivity caused by neurogenic bladder, the International Continence Society defines two types of idiopathic detrusor overactivity: phasic and terminal. Although many studies have explored overactive bladder and detrusor overactivity under different conditions, no literature directly compares these two types of detrusor contractions. Therefore, we aim to compare phasic and terminal detrusor overactivity in women with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Between July 2009 and December 2023, medical records of all women with lower urinary tract symptoms who underwent urodynamic studies in the urogynecological department of a medical center were reviewed. The medical records of phasic or terminal detrusor overactivity were selected for comparison (N=290). Those with phasic and terminal detrusor overactivity were excluded (N=21).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Hypothesis / aims of study Detrusor overactivity (DO) can be classified into phasic or terminal ones. However, to our knowledge, clinical and urodynamic differences between phasic or terminal DO have never been reported. Therefore, the objective of this study is to elucidate the above differences.

Study design, materials and methods Between July 2009 and December 2023, medical records, including urodynamic data, bladder dairy data, and questionnaires, including patient perception of bladder condition, urgency severity scale, overactive bladder symptom score, urogenital distress inventory, incontinence impact questionnaire and King's health questionnaire, of all women with lower urinary tract symptoms who underwent urodynamic studies in the urogynecological department of a medical center were reviewed. The medical records of phasic or terminal DO were selected for comparison. Those with phasic and terminal DO were excluded.

STATA software was used for statistical analysis. Wilcoxon rank sum test or chi-square test were used for statistical analysis, as appropriate. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

290

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women more than 20-year-old with lower urinary tract symptoms, received urodynamic study and was diagnosed with detrusor overactivity.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • > 20 y/o
  • Women with lower urinary tract symptoms
  • Complete urodynamic study with a diagnosis of detrusor overactivity
  • Complete the questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Woman who was pregnant
  • Chronic pelvic inflammatory disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Phasic DO
Detrusor involuntary contraction during filling cystometry before strong-desire to void volume
Terminal DO
Detrusor involuntary contraction at the end of filling cystometry

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Life quality
Time Frame: Between July 2009 and December 2023
Use King's health questionnaire Question 2 to evaluate the life quality of the 2 cohort (score 1-4, higher score indicates worse life quality)
Between July 2009 and December 2023

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Strong-desire to void volume (mL) in urodynamic study
Time Frame: Between July 2009 and December 2023
Use urodynamic study to evaluate the bladder capacity of the 2 cohort
Between July 2009 and December 2023

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ho-Hsiung Lin, M.D. Ph.D, National Taiwan University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 17, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 202406143RINE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The data will be provided under request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Detrusor Overacitivity

Subscribe