Clinical Interest of the Temporary Urethral Stent Allium " Bulbar Urethral Stent " in the Treatment of Detrusor Sphincter Dyssynergia (ALLIUM)

August 2, 2017 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Detrusor striated sphincter dyssynergia (DSSD) is defined as the persistence or increasing of the striated sphincter activity during voiding and characterizes the spinal cord injuries located under the protuberance. The standard treatment for DSSD is medical, either pharmacological or by clean intermittent self-catheterisation (CISC). Some patients are unable to perform CISC and require alternative surgical techniques such as external sphincterotomy which is invasive, irreversible and with no adjustment period for the patient.

Urethral stents have been developed as an alternative to surgical sphincterotomy. Temporary stents provide a non-definitive treatment, especially for evolutionary pathologies, for patients refusing a destructive surgery (psychosocial impact), or for patients having not defined yet their therapeutic preference. The Allium company has developed the " Bulbar Urethral Stent " (BUS) system, which advantages are the possibility to perform the procedure under local anesthesia and to remove more easily the stent, with similar performances compared to the other devices. In order to quantify the interest of the BUS system, the investigators propose to perform a prospective study aimed at describing its technical and clinical results in terms of efficacy and safety.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

9

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Pierre Bénite cedex, France, 69495
        • Service de Chirurgie-Urologie - Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male patient aged more than 18 years old
  • Presenting detrusor striated sphincter dyssynergia in the opinion of the investigator, based on clinical data and proven urodynamically
  • Detrusor striated sphincter dyssynergia with identified neurological origin
  • With contraindication or failure of the conventional treatments
  • Accepting the principle of the prosthetic incontinentation
  • Having given his signed consent to participate in the study
  • Affiliated with a social security scheme or assimilated.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minor patient or protected adult according to the terms of the law
  • Presenting contraindications to local regional anaesthesia
  • Presenting contraindications or a previous failure to the treatment by prosthetic sphincterotomy
  • Unable to hold a penile sheath.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Allium BUS
Temporary urethral stent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients who perceive their voiding condition improved or very improved
Time Frame: One month after the surgical intervention
The perception of voiding condition by the patient will be measured with a 5-point Likert Scale. The patient will have to define the voiding condition compared to the initial (pre-procedure), as: very worse, worse, non-changed, improved, or very improved
One month after the surgical intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of stents correctly positioned
Time Frame: Immediately after the surgical intervention
Immediately after the surgical intervention
Number of stent migrations
Time Frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the surgical intervention
1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the surgical intervention
Number of stent removals performed without hemorrhage
Time Frame: 12 months after the surgical intervention
12 months after the surgical intervention
Number of complications, i.e. symptomatic urinary tract infections, encrustations, stenosis and hematuria, need for re-intervention and removals of the stent
Time Frame: Up to 12 months after the surgical intervention
Up to 12 months after the surgical intervention
Post-void residual volume measured by retrograde urinary urethrocystography
Time Frame: At inclusion and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the surgical intervention
At inclusion and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the surgical intervention
Maximum detrusor pressure and maximum urethral closure pressure, measured during the urodynamic testing
Time Frame: At inclusion, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the surgical intervention
At inclusion, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the surgical intervention
QUALIVEEN short form score (approved in French)
Time Frame: At inclusion and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the surgical intervention
At inclusion and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the surgical intervention
Number of patients requesting a change in the voiding method, i.e. premature removal of the stent
Time Frame: Up to 12 months following the surgical intervention
Up to 12 months following the surgical intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 23, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

3
Subscribe