Oral vs Intravesical Analgesia for Office Bladder Botox Injections (OPIL)

Oral Phenazopyridine Versus Intravesical Lidocaine for Office OnabotulinumtoxinA Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) bladder injections are a highly effective treatment for overactive bladder and urgency urinary incontinence. The procedure is typically performed in the office setting with one of two medications to control comfort. However, the effectiveness of these medications has never been compared. The goal of this study is to determine which medication is better at providing comfort during bladder Botox® injections.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary aim of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the analgesic effect of oral phenazopyridine to that of intravesical lidocaine during intradetrusor injections of onabotulinumtoxinA performed for idiopathic overactive bladder. The investigators will achieve this by measuring the mean visual-analog pain scores (VAS) in women who are randomized to receive either oral phenazopyridine or intravesical lidocaine.

Secondary aims include assessment of:

  1. Overall Patient Satisfaction: To compare overall patient satisfaction with the onabotulinumtoxinA injection procedure in women randomized to pre-procedure oral phenazopyridine versus those randomized to intravesical lidocaine instillation.
  2. Ease of Procedure: To compare the physician's perception of ease of onabotulinumtoxinA injection procedure in women randomized to pre-procedure oral phenazopyridine versus those randomized to intravesical lidocaine instillation.
  3. Office Efficiency/Total Appointment Duration: To compare total appointment time or total time spent in an office exam/procedure room in women randomized to pre-procedure oral phenazopyridine versus those randomized to intravesical lidocaine instillation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

110

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
        • Recruiting
        • Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-pregnant, adult females 18 years of age or older
  • Diagnosis of idiopathic overactive bladder
  • Planning office-based bladder injection of onabotulinumtoxinA
  • Willing and able to complete all study related items and interviews
  • Grossly neurologically normal on exam

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known neurologic diseases (multiple sclerosis, Parkinson Disease, CVA within 6 months, myasthenia gravis, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, peripheral neuropathy, and complete spinal cord injury) believed to affect urinary function
  • Planned injection of >100 units of onabotulinumtoxinA
  • OnabotulinumtoxinA given for another indication within the previous 3 months (if cumulative dose would total >400 units)
  • Any intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections in the previous 12 months
  • Serum creatinine level greater than twice the upper limit of normal within the year prior to enrollment
  • Allergy to lidocaine
  • Allergy to onabotulinumtoxinA
  • Allergy to phenazopyridine
  • Untreated urinary tract infection (UTI)
  • Currently pregnant or lactating.
  • Known urinary retention (post-void residual >200mL) and inability to perform intermittent self-catheterization
  • Uninvestigated hematuria (gross or microscopic)
  • Current or prior bladder malignancy
  • Previous bladder augmentation or surgically altered detrusor muscle
  • Prior pelvic radiation
  • Primary language other than English or Spanish

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Oral Phenazopyridine
Patients randomized to the oral phenzopyridine arm will receive 200mg phenazopyridine to take by mouth 1-2 hours before their scheduled procedure.
200mg PO Phenazopyridine taken 1-2 hours prior to the Botox® injection procedure
Active Comparator: Intravesical Lidocaine
Patients randomized to the intravesical lidocaine arm will have the bladder back-filled with 30mL 2% lidocaine for the 20 minutes immediately preceding their procedure.
30mL 2% lidocaine instilled into the bladder lumen 20 via a urinary catheter 20 minutes prior to the Botox® injection procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analgesic Effect Measured with 100mm Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: Immediately post-procedure
The visual analog scale is a visual representation of pain severity rated from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Therefore higher numbers represent more pain.The scale is represented visually using a 100 millimeter line and patients indicate their level of pain by pointing to a location on the line.
Immediately post-procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Immediately post-procedure
Overall patient satisfaction with the onabotulinumtoxinA injection procedure in women randomized to pre-procedure oral phenazopyridine versus those randomized to intravesical lidocaine instillation. Overall satisfaction will be measured with a single-item question utilizing a Likert scale with options ranging from very satisfied to very unsatisfied.
Immediately post-procedure
Ease of Procedure
Time Frame: Immediately post-procedure
Physician's perception of ease of onabotulinumtoxinA injection procedure in women randomized to pre-procedure oral phenazopyridine versus those randomized to intravesical lidocaine instillation. This will be measured with a single item, five point Likert scale with options ranging from no difficulty to great difficulty.
Immediately post-procedure
Office Efficiency/Total Appointment Duration
Time Frame: Immediately post-procedure
Total appointment time or total time spent in an office exam/procedure room in women randomized to pre-procedure oral phenazopyridine versus those randomized to intravesical lidocaine instillation. This will be measured by subtracting the appointment start time (time the patient was placed in the exam room) from the appointment end time (time of patient check-out).
Immediately post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lauren E Stewart, MD, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on Phenazopyridine

3
Subscribe