COMPARISON of MINERAL TRIOXIDE AGGREGATE and CALCIUM HYDROXIDE AS INDIRECT PULP CAPPING AGENTS in PRIMARY MOLARS

January 29, 2025 updated by: RANA AHMAD, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University

CLINICAL and RADIOGRAPHIC COMPARISON of MINERAL TRIOXIDE AGGREGATE and CALCIUM HYDROXIDE AS INDIRECT PULP CAPPING AGENTS in PRIMARY MOLARS: a RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

The study is designed as randomized clinical trial performed at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry , Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS) , Islamabad on primary molars requiring indirect pulp treatment in patients aged 5 to 9 years. Two groups , I and II of 40 teeth each will be selected according to inclusion criteria . In Group I , indirect pulp capping will be done with Calcium hydroxide while in Group II , it will be done with MTA . Both the groups will be evaluated clinically and radiographically at 0, 3 and 6 months . Results were compiled and analyzed using standard statistical techniques.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Capital
      • Islamabad, Capital, Pakistan, 44000
        • Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical Criteria :

    • Primary molars with deep carious lesions
    • No H/O spontaneous pain
    • No associated swelling
    • No tenderness to percussion
    • Absence of pathological mobility
    • No sinus tract
    • Restorable

Radiographic Criteria :

  • No periapical radiolucency
  • No loss of lamina dura
  • No physiological root resorption
  • Teeth with radiographic evidence of more than 0.25mm remaining dentin thickness
  • No furcal radiolucency

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non restorable teeth

    • Teeth with pathological mobility
    • Teeth with extensive external/internal root resorption.
    • Teeth with pulp canal calcifications
    • Subjects inability to tolerate any of the dental products being used
    • Systemic disease or severe medical complications ; Lack of compliance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group I patients, Calcium hydroxide
For Group I patients, Calcium hydroxide (Dycal_ Ivory,Dentsply Caulk, Dentsply, L.D. Caulk, Milford, DE,USA ) was used. The catalyst and paste were mixed as per the manufacturer's recommendations.
For Group I patients, Calcium hydroxide (Dycal_ Ivory,Dentsply Caulk, Dentsply, L.D. Caulk, Milford, DE,USA ) was used. The catalyst and paste were mixed as per the manufacturer's recommendations.
Experimental: Group II patients, MTA
MTA powder ( ProRoot; Dentsply ⁄ Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK,USA) was added to sterile water. The mixture was left to achieve a sandy consistency for about thirty seconds. Then, the material was applied to the cavity using a ball condenser.
MTA powder ( ProRoot; Dentsply ⁄ Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK,USA) was added to sterile water. The mixture was left to achieve a sandy consistency for about thirty seconds. Then, the material was applied to the cavity using a ball condenser.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dentine bridge thickness (DBT)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months follow up appointment in all successful cases.
Dentine bridge thickness (DBT) was measured at the 3 and 6 months follow up appointment in all successful cases.
3 and 6 months follow up appointment in all successful cases.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • F.1-1/2015/ERB/SZABMU/ERB

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Indirect Pulp Cap

Clinical Trials on Calcium Hydroxide (Ca(OH)2)

Subscribe