Intraperitoneal Ketamine Versus Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

February 4, 2025 updated by: Shehrum Bughio, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College
The intraperitoneal approach is used in anesthesia to manage the pain associated with abdominal procedures. Few studies have been conducted comparing intraperitonela ketamine with bupivacaine for pain control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) patients. To compare effect of intraperitoneal ketamine versus bupivacaine for postoperative pain control after LC. Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi. Group K received ketamine whereas Group B received bupivacaine. In Group K, ketamine 0.25mg/kg diluted in normal saline to a total volume of 40 ml was instilled by the surgeon. In Group B, bupivacaine 2mg/kgdiluted in normal saline to a total volume of 40ml was administered. Tramadol 1.5 mg/kg to a maximum of 100 mg IV was given as rescue analgesia. The pain was assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero being no pain to ten being the worst possible pain. Pain was assessed using NRS at 0 hour (immediate postoperative period), 2 hour, 4 hour, 6 hour and 12 hours postoperatively.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Proper pain management encourages quick ambling, reduces the likelihood of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, enhances the patient's ability to breathe deeply, which reduces the possibility of pulmonary complications, and reduces tachycardia and the unnecessary investigations that are linked to it. Few studies have been conducted comparing intraperitoneal ketamine with bupivacaine for pain control in LC patients. Thus we planned the current study to compare effect of intraperitoneal ketamine versus bupivacaine for post-surgery pain control after LC.

This double blinded randomized controlled trial was performed in Operation theatre, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan. The study was commenced with the institutional ethical approval. The study included all ASA I and II patients, male or female, aged 20 to 70, who were planned to undergo elective LC. Patients with known allergies to study drugs with any chronic pain condition, taking chronic pain medications, having psychiatric illness, weighing more than 80 kg, emergency surgery and converted to open cholecystectomy were excluded. Patients were enrolled with their written informed consent.

Sample size of 46 per arm was estimated using online available calculator Open-Epi, by taking mean VAS score of 3.0±0.86 in ketamine group and 3.50±0.84 in bupivacaine group at 12 hour at power of 80% and 95% confidence interval. Patients were enrolled using a consecutive sampling procedure, while groups were assigned at random using opaque, sealed envelopes that were consecutively numbered.

In Group K, ketamine 0.25mg/kg diluted in normal saline to a total volume of 40 ml was instilled by the surgeon, 20 ml before starting gall bladder dissection over the surgical site and liver while remaining 20 ml at the end of procedure after securing haemostasis over gall bladder bed and liver. In Group B, bupivacaine 2mg/kg diluted in normal saline to a total volume of 40ml was administered in similar way as described in Group K.

Patients' demographic profile including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), clinical profile comorbidity, ASA grade, surgery duration and pain status were documented. Weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m) was the definition of BMI. Co-morbidities of patients was confirmed from previous medical records or evidence against medication to treat underlying condition.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

92

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sindh
      • Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 75300
        • Liaquat National Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of age 20-70 years
  • Patients of either gender
  • Patients planned to undergo elective LC

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients known to allergic to study drugs
  • Patients with chronic pain conditions
  • Patients taking chronic pain medications
  • Patients having psychiatric illness
  • Patients weighing more than 80 kg,
  • Emergency surgery and/or converted to open cholecystectomy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group K
In Group K, ketamine 0.25mg/kg diluted in normal saline to a total volume of 40 ml was instilled by the surgeon, 20 ml before starting gall bladder dissection over the surgical site and liver while remaining 20 ml at the end of procedure after securing haemostasis over gall bladder bed and liver.
In Group K, ketamine 0.25mg/kg diluted in normal saline to a total volume of 40 ml was instilled by the surgeon, 20 ml before starting gall bladder dissection over the surgical site and liver while remaining 20 ml at the end of procedure after securing haemostasis over gall bladder bed and liver.
Active Comparator: Group B
In Group B, bupivacaine 2mg/kgdiluted in normal saline to a total volume of 40ml .
In Group B, bupivacaine at a dose of 2 mg/kg was diluted in normal saline to a total volume of 40 ml. The administration was performed by the surgeon in two stages: the first 20 ml was instilled before starting the gall bladder dissection, applied over the surgical site and liver, while the remaining 20 ml was instilled at the end of the procedure after achieving hemostasis, applied over the gall bladder bed and liver.
Other Names:
  • Active compitator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain status
Time Frame: 2 hour, 4 hour, 6 hour and 12 hours postoperatively.
The pain was assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero being no pain to ten being the worst possible pain. Pain was assessed using NRS at 0 hour (immediate postoperative period), 2 hour, 4 hour, 6 hour and 12 hours postoperatively.
2 hour, 4 hour, 6 hour and 12 hours postoperatively.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Ziaei P, Kargar S, Dehghan MH, Madadizadeh F, Jamshidi HR. Clinical Trial of Intraperitoneal Administration of Ketamine Combined with Bupivacaine on Pain Status after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. 2022.
  • Mostafa, R.H. and Mekki, Y.M.H., 2018. Comparative evaluation of intraperitoneal bupivacaine and bupivacaine ketamine combined with lung recruitment for reducing postoperative shoulder pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia, 34(4), pp.159-164.
  • Moharari RS, Hadavi M, Pourfakhr P, Najafi A, Etezadi F, Khajavi MR. Evaluation of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of intraperitoneal ketamine compared with bupivacaine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Anesthesiol Crit Care. 2016;2(1):146-9.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery

Clinical Trials on Ketamine

Subscribe