Comparison of 30-day Morbidity and Mortality in Cancer Patients Based on Emergency Department Location (COVER)

January 16, 2026 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Comparison of 30-day Morbidity and Mortality in Cancer Patients Based on Emergency Department Location: Referring Oncology Hospital vs Other Hospitals.

Patients being followed for cancer account for 2.8% of emergency admissions in France. An acute episode that triggers a visit to the emergency department may be related to the progression of the disease, or to complications of treatment. The management of these patients is often complex and requires a degree of expertise. Emergency departments specialising in the management of cancer complications have been set up, and now deal exclusively with patients treated at their centres. However, for geographical or logistical reasons, patients with cancer are likely to consult a non-specialist emergency department and/or one located outside the cancer care centre. In this case, the emergency doctor may not have access to the oncology file, and care in the emergency department and downstream services may be sub-optimal. Studies have shown a positive impact on the quality of care and prognosis of patients thanks to the cancer centre's expertise. However, the effect of the centre on a cancer patient who visits the emergency department has never been studied. This is particularly true if the emergency department where the patient is seen is located in the cancer follow-up centre.

The primary objective of the COVER study is to investigate the impact of the location of the emergency department where the patient is seen for their prognosis.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière Emergency department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients followed for cancer and consulting the emergency department

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients aged 18 or over admitted to an emergency department with cancer that has been active or in remission for less than a year.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Opposition to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients who visit the ED of the refereing oncologic hospital
Patients who visit another ED

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of days alive spent outside the hospital
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Mortality
Time Frame: Day 90
Day 90
Occurrence of a new/ unscheduled consultation
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Length of hospitalisation
Time Frame: 90 day
90 day
Unscheduled consultation or hospitalization emergency department discharge
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Unexpected death
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Secondary admission to the intensive care unit during the initial hospitalization following the emergency visit
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Occurence of organ failure
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Quality of life with QLQ-C30
Time Frame: 90 days
QLQ-C30
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHP240971
  • IDRCB: 2024-A01679-38 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Hong Kong

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe