3D Integration of Facial , Intraoral Scanning and CBCT on Patient Satisfaction and Occlusion of Temporary, Permanent Implant Supported Prosthesis

February 20, 2025 updated by: Mansoura University

Effect of 3D Integration of Facial Scanning, Intraoral Scanning and CBCT on Patient Satisfaction and Occlusion of Temporary and Permanent Full Arch Implant Supported Prosthesis

This study will aim to evaluate the effect of complete digital workflow for construction of temporary and permanent full arch implant supported screw retained restoration by the 3D integration of facial scanning, intraoral scanning and CBCT regarding patient satisfaction (VAS score) and occlusion.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

Aim: evaluating the effect of complete digital workflow for construction of temporary and permanent full arch implant supported screw retained restoration by the 3D integration of facial scanning, intraoral scanning and CBCT regarding patient satisfaction (VAS score) and occlusion.

Methods:1. Four radio opaque markers on patient's face will be placed. The first facial scan will be done (FS1) using a facial scanner (Bellus3D mobile application) while the patient is smiling.

2.A proper size of triple tray will be selected and adjusted if needed, and the impression material will be kept to the minimum required to avoid any overextension that can cause forced soft tissue displacement. The handle will be removed and 3 markers will be placed on the front of the triple tray.

3- The tray will be filled with heavy body vinylpolysiloxane (VPS) material and inserted in patient's mouth. The patient will be instructed to close in habitual occlusion and the second facial scan (FS2) will be taken with the head in the same position.

4. Both facial scans will be imported to a dental software design program as STL1 and STL2 files, respectively. A CBCT will be taken while the markers are still in place. Through the face scans and CBCT scan, make sure the patient is in a natural head position where reference lines (Frankfurt plane and occlusal plane) are confirmed to be parallel to the floor. The patient will be instructed to stay still.

5. The maxillary and mandibular intraoral scans will be taken with jaw relation record (STL3) using an intraoral scanner and scan the triple tray on both sides and external borders with markers in place using the Bio copy tool in Prime scan (STL4).

6. All scans will be exported to the design software. and use the design module of CAD software to superimpose the facial scans (STL1 and STL2) by using markers as reference points 7.The intraoral scans will be integrated to facial scans by using the inter arch impression STL4 (Scan of triple tray or Bio copy) as a merging tool. Complete the facially generated diagnostic wax up (STL5).

8. The completed maxillary diagnostic wax up (STL5) will be exported, pre op intraoral scans (STL3) and will be imported to implant planning software using STL markers to merge STL files correctly. the STL files with CBCT will be merged, and the interim restoration will be designed in the software program and it will be 3D printed.

9.the interim restoration will be inserted and the patient satisfaction and occlusion will be evaluated.

10. The patient will receive postoperative instructions until the definitive prostheses will be fabricated.

11.After insertion of the permanent restoration the patient satisfaction and occlusion will be evaluated.

Evaluation:• Occlusal analysis will be evaluated by occluo-scence (measuring the balance of occlusal contact forces, the sequence, strength, and density of the occlusal contacts The patient's recorded occlusal information will be transmitted and displayed on the app.

• patient satisfaction will be evaluated by using (VAS score) on a line from 0 to 100mm (0 mm is very bad /100 mm is excellent).

Are you satisfied with the esthetic outcome of the treatment? Does the treatment answer to your expectations? Would you choose the same treatment again? Is your ability to chew improved after placement of the implant prothesis? Did you find the complete treatment time too prolonged?

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mansoura, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dentistry Mansoura University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy individuals with the completely edentulous maxilla and mandible rehabilitated by six implants.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • individuals with uncontrolled systemic diseases that affect the success of implant survival rate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Temporary full arch implant supported prosthesis.
full arch temporary implant supported prosthesis will be fabricated for the first group using PMMA material

The OccluSense handheld is a battery powered device which uses your local wireless network to transmit the recorded data to the OccluSense-iPad-App.

The inductive charger provides wireless power transfer. Fully charged batteries allow up to 4 hours usage of the device.

• patient satisfaction will be evaluated by using (VAS score) on a line from 0 to 100mm (0 mm is very bad /100 mm is excellent).

Are you satisfied with the esthetic outcome of the treatment? Does the treatment answer to your expectations? Would you choose the same treatment again? Is your ability to chew improved after placement of the implant prothesis? Did you find the complete treatment time too prolonged?

Active Comparator: permanent full arch implant supported prosthesis.
Permanent full arch implant supported prosthesis will be fabricated for the second group from zirconia

The OccluSense handheld is a battery powered device which uses your local wireless network to transmit the recorded data to the OccluSense-iPad-App.

The inductive charger provides wireless power transfer. Fully charged batteries allow up to 4 hours usage of the device.

• patient satisfaction will be evaluated by using (VAS score) on a line from 0 to 100mm (0 mm is very bad /100 mm is excellent).

Are you satisfied with the esthetic outcome of the treatment? Does the treatment answer to your expectations? Would you choose the same treatment again? Is your ability to chew improved after placement of the implant prothesis? Did you find the complete treatment time too prolonged?

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
occlusion of temporary and permanent full arch implant supported prosthesis constructed by digital workflow
Time Frame: "through study completion, an average of 1 year"
"through study completion, an average of 1 year"

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient satisfaction of temporary and permanent full arch implant supported prosthesis constructed by digital workflow using (vas score)
Time Frame: "through study completion, an average of 1 year"

• patient satisfaction will be evaluated by using (VAS score) on a line from 0 to 100mm (0 mm is very bad /100 mm is excellent).

Are you satisfied with the esthetic outcome of the treatment? Does the treatment answer to your expectations? Would you choose the same treatment again? Is your ability to chew improved after placement of the implant prothesis? Did you find the complete treatment time too prolonged?

"through study completion, an average of 1 year"

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mostafa Abdo El Syad, Professor, Faculty of Dentistry Mansoura University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • A04012023RP

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patient Satisfaction

Subscribe