Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery

July 1, 2025 updated by: Bora Bilal, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia Management in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery

Postoperative pain is a significant problem in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery. This situation disrupts the patient's comfort and affects the functional outcome after surgery by preventing early rehabilitation. Various methods are used for postoperative pain control. Intravenous opioid agents are one of the most commonly used analgesic techniques. However, opioids can cause undesirable side effects such as respiratory depression, sedation, constipation, allergic reactions, nausea, and vomiting. Therefore, alternative techniques are needed to reduce opioid use.

Serratus posterior superior interfascial plane block (SPSIPB) is a novel interfascial plane block described by Tulgar et al in 2023. It is based on injection into the serratus posterior superior muscle at the level of the 2nd or 3rd rib. This block provides analgesia in cases such as interscapular pain, chronic myofascial pain syndromes, scapulocostal syndrome, and shoulder pain. It has been reported that SPSIPB provides effective shoulder analgesia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Postoperative pain is a significant problem in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery. This situation disrupts the patient's comfort, prevents early rehabilitation, and affects the functional outcome after surgery. Various methods are used for postoperative pain control. Intravenous opioid agents are one of the most commonly used analgesic techniques. However, opioids can cause undesirable side effects such as respiratory depression, sedation, constipation, allergic reactions, nausea, and vomiting. Therefore, alternative techniques are needed to reduce opioid use. Regional techniques can be used for postoperative pain treatment following arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Ultrasound (US)-guided serratus posterior superior block (SPSIPB) is a novel interfascial plane block described by Tulgar et al in 2023. It is based on the principle of injection into the serratus posterior superior muscle at the level of the 2nd or 3rd rib. This block provides analgesia in cases such as interscapular pain, chronic myofascial pain syndromes, scapulocostal syndrome, and shoulder pain. The SPS muscle is located at the C7-T2 level. It attaches to the lateral edges of the second and fifth ribs. It is innervated by the lower cervical and upper intercostal nerves. Analgesia is provided by blocking these nerves with the SPS block. Tulgar et al. reported in their cadaver study that the spread of the serratus posterior superior interfascial plane block; staining in the superficial fascia of the trapezius muscle was observed only on the left side at the 7-10th intercostal levels, but not on the right. There was significant staining deep in the trapezius muscle on both sides. Both the surface and the skin of the rhomboid major were clearly stained, while only the skin of the rhomboid minor was stained; SPSP block will provide successful analgesia in procedures involving the thoracic region such as breast surgery, thoracic surgery, and shoulder surgery.

In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of SPSIPB by comparing the control group in patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, 46200
        • Recruiting
        • KSU Faculty of Medicine Research Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Bagcilar
      • Istanbul, Bagcilar, Turkey, 34000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • İstanbul Medipol University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
  • Scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of bleeding diathesis,
  • receiving anticoagulant treatment,
  • known local anesthetics and opioid allergy,
  • infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture,
  • patients who do not accept the procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group SPSIPB = SPSIPB group
SPSIPB will be performed
Patients will be administered ibuprofen 400 mgr IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period. A patient-controlled device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol including 10 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time, and 4-hour limit. If the NRS score is ≥ 4, 0.5 mg kg-1 iv meperidine will be administered as a rescue analgesic. Postoperative patient evaluation will be performed by an anesthesiologist blinded to the procedure.
A high-frequency linear US probe (11-12 MHz, Vivid Q) will be covered with a sterile sheath, and an 80 mm block needle (Braun 360°) will be used. The procedure will be performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. After the scapula is shifted slightly laterally, the US probe is placed sagittal at the upper corner of the spina scapula, and the serratus posterior superior muscle is visualized with the third rib. The in-plane technique will be used. The block needle will be advanced in the craniocaudal direction to enter between the serratus posterior superior and the third rib. The block location will be confirmed by injecting 5 ml of saline between the rib and the muscle. After the block location is confirmed, 30 ml of 0.25% concentration bupivacaine will be used.
Other: Group Control
Conventional analgesia management will be performed
Patients will be administered ibuprofen 400 mgr IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period. A patient-controlled device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol including 10 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time, and 4-hour limit. If the NRS score is ≥ 4, 0.5 mg kg-1 iv meperidine will be administered as a rescue analgesic. Postoperative patient evaluation will be performed by an anesthesiologist blinded to the procedure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid consumption (Fentanyl PCA)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline opioid consumption at postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours.
The primary aim is to compare postoperative opioid consumption from the PCA device.
Changes from baseline opioid consumption at postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Need for rescue analgesia (meperidine)
Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours period
The secondary aim is to compare rescue analgesia used in the postoperative 24 h.
Postoperative 24 hours period
Pain scores (Numerical rating scale-NRS)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline pain scores at postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours
The secondary aim is to compare NRS at the postoperative 24 h. Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the NRS (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt). The NRS scores will be recorded
Changes from baseline pain scores at postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours
Adverse events
Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours period
The secondary aim is to compare the adverse events (nausea, vomiting, itching) related to opioid use
Postoperative 24 hours period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

We will not plan to share IPD

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shoulder Injuries

Clinical Trials on Postoperative analgesia management

Subscribe