Motor-Cognitive Interactive Upper Limb Robot Rehabilitation for Post-Stroke Motor Dysfunction

April 22, 2025 updated by: Lidian Chen

Motor-Cognitive Interactive Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robot Intervention for Post-Stroke Motor Dysfunction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study

This study aims to investigate the effects of motor-cognitive interactive robot-assisted training on improving upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke. By observing different combinations of motor and cognitive components in the training, the study will clarify the relationship between the proportion of motor and cognitive elements and the recovery of upper limb motor function. The goal is to optimize the training protocol for upper limb rehabilitation robots and enhance their therapeutic outcomes.

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: motor-cognitive interactive robot-assisted training, motor-focused robot-assisted training, or conventional rehabilitation training. Training sessions will last 60 minutes, occur 5 times per week, and continue for 4 weeks. Researchers will measure changes in upper limb function and monitor for any adverse events during the training.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1047

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Fuzhou, China, 350122
        • Recruiting
        • Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of stroke confirmed by CT or MRI.
  2. Age between 40 and 80 years, with no gender restrictions.
  3. First-ever stroke with unilateral limb paralysis.
  4. Onset of stroke between 2 weeks and 6 months prior, with an FMA-UE score of 8-44.
  5. Willingness to participate and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of neuromuscular diseases, malignant tumors, or other severe uncontrolled conditions, including cardiac, renal, or hepatic diseases.
  2. Seated balance score < 2, or inability to maintain a sitting position for more than 60 minutes.
  3. Modified Ashworth Scale score > 2.
  4. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score > 3 for hemiplegic shoulder pain.
  5. Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination score < 3.
  6. Severe visual impairment preventing participation in upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation training.
  7. Hamilton Depression Scale score >17, indicating moderate to severe depressive symptoms.
  8. Participation in other clinical trials that may interfere with the results of this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Motor-cognitive interactive robot-assisted training
Motor-cognitive interactive robot-assisted training integrates motor and cognitive rehabilitation using an upper limb rehabilitation robot. If patients cannot actively lift the robotic arm, an eye-tracking mode detects movement intention and guides the arm along predefined trajectories, adjusting motor and cognitive loads dynamically. As motor function improves, training shifts to an active mode with increased resistance. Patients complete cognitive tasks before moving the robotic arm, while the system monitors movement parameters and provides real-time feedback. Training consists of 60-minute sessions, five days per week for four weeks. Motor load progresses by increasing robotic arm speed or resistance, while cognitive load advances based on task accuracy, ensuring personalized and adaptive rehabilitation.
Experimental: Motor-focused robot-assisted training
Motor-focused robot-assisted training primarily emphasizes motor rehabilitation through the use of an upper limb rehabilitation robot. When patients are unable to actively lift the robotic arm, an eye-tracking mode is employed to guide movements, with adjustments made solely to the motor load. As motor function improves, the training transitions to an active mode, progressively increasing resistance while maintaining a constant, minimal level of cognitive difficulty. Patients are required to complete cognitive tasks before initiating movement of the robotic arm, while the system monitors key movement parameters and provides real-time feedback. Training consists of 60-minute sessions, five days per week for four weeks. Motor load is progressively increased by adjusting the speed or resistance of the robotic arm, while cognitive load remains consistently at the lowest level throughout the training.
Experimental: Conventional rehabilitation training
Conventional rehabilitation training adheres to internationally established guidelines and employs task-oriented approaches tailored to activities of daily living (ADLs). The therapeutic regimen incorporates fundamental motor skill exercises, including but not limited to grasp-and-release maneuvers, targeted reaching, fine motor skill development (e.g., button manipulation, zipper operation), and bilateral coordination tasks (e.g., garment folding, towel wringing). The intervention protocol emphasizes progressive task difficulty and functional task integration, with each session lasting 60 minutes. The treatment schedule consists of daily sessions, five times per week, over a four-week duration.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks (post-intervention)
Score range 0-66, higher scores indicate better upper limb motor recovery.
4 weeks (post-intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale
Time Frame: 3 months (post-intervention follow-up)
Score range 0-66, higher scores indicate better upper limb motor recovery.
3 months (post-intervention follow-up)
Upper limb kinematics during standardized 3D grid tasks
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The investigators quantify upper limb kinematics using the robot through standardized 3D grid-pointing tasks to measure motion trajectories during task execution.
4 weeks
Upper Limb Muscle Strength Assessment
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 3 months
Muscle strength is assessed using Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) graded via the Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale (range: 0-5, where 0 = no muscle contraction and 5 = normal strength, higher scores indicate better outcomes).
4 weeks, 3 months
Modified Barthel Index
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 3 months
Score range 0-100, higher scores indicate better independence in activities of daily living.
4 weeks, 3 months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 3 months
Score range 0-30, higher scores indicate better cognitive function.
4 weeks, 3 months
Auditory Verbal Learning Test
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 3 months
4 weeks, 3 months
Trail Making Test Part A
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 3 months
4 weeks, 3 months
Trail Making Test Part B
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 3 months
4 weeks, 3 months
Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 3 months
Score range 49-245, higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life in stroke survivors.
4 weeks, 3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exercise-associated Blood Biomarkers
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Quantitative measurement of exercise-associated biomarkers in venous blood using standardized ELISA kits
4 weeks
Multimodal Neuroimaging Analysis
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Structural (T1-MPRAGE) and resting-state fMRI data acquired via 3T MRI. Structural analysis includes voxel-based morphometry (VBM) for gray matter volume. Functional analysis covers: ALFF, ReHo, FC, and graph-theory network topology (global/local efficiency).
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 8, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Motor-cognitive interactive robot

Subscribe