Waveform Capnography Compared to Colorimetric Carbon Dioxide Detection During Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults (WAVE)

May 6, 2026 updated by: Brian Driver

Waveform Capnography and Colorimetric Carbon Dioxide Detection During Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults

This study will compare the sensitivity and specificity of waveform capnography versus colorimetric carbon dioxide detection to identify tracheal placement of the endotracheal tube during intubation of critically ill adults.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2092

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Rush University Medical Center
        • Contact:
    • Massachusetts
      • Burlington, Massachusetts, United States, 01805
        • Recruiting
        • Lahey Hospital & Medical Center
        • Contact:
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55415
        • Recruiting
        • Hennepin Healthcare
        • Contact:
      • Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States, 55101
    • New York
      • Albany, New York, United States, 12208
        • Recruiting
        • Albany Medical Center
        • Contact:
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Duke University School of Medicine
        • Contact:
          • James Herbert, MD, PhD
          • Phone Number: (919) 684-8111
          • Email: jth7@duke.edu
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Recruiting
        • Wake Forest School of Medicine
        • Contact:
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Recruiting
        • The Ohio State University College of Medicine
        • Contact:
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Recruiting
        • Oregon Health and Sciences University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Critically ill adult patients undergoing emergency intubation

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is located in a participating unit (ED or ICU)
  2. Patient is undergoing tracheal intubation.
  3. The clinician intends to use an exhaled CO2 detection device to confirm tracheal placement of the tube.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is known to be a prisoner
  2. Patient is known to be < 18 years old
  3. A responsible clinician has determined that sole use of either waveform capnography or colorimetric testing is required for optimal care of the patient.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Critically ill adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation
Adult patients who are undergoing emergency intubation in the ED and ICU
All patients will undergo colorimetric carbon dioxide (CO2) detection. The reading will be assessed by a clinician at the bedside who will answer yes or no to the following question, asked after 7 breaths have been delivered following intubation: "Is the color change consistent with a tube located in the trachea?"
All patients will undergo waveform capnography. The reading will be assessed by a clinician at the bedside who will answer yes or no to the following question, asked after 7 breaths have been delivered following intubation: " Is the waveform consistent with a tube located in the trachea?"

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of the test of exhaled carbon dioxide to detect a endotracheal tube positioned in the trachea.
Time Frame: From intubation until 7 breaths from the ventilator are delivered, approximately 1 minute

The primary endpoint is the sensitivity of each test (against the reference standard) to accurately detect the tube location within the trachea.

The sensitivity of each CO2 detection method describes the probability that the CO2 detection method is consistent with a tube location in the trachea for a patient who has an endotracheal tube located inside the trachea.

From intubation until 7 breaths from the ventilator are delivered, approximately 1 minute

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Specificity of the test of exhaled carbon dioxide to detect a endotracheal tube positioned outside of the trachea.
Time Frame: From intubation until 7 breaths from the ventilator are delivered, approximately 1 minute

The secondary endpoint is the specificity of each test (against the reference standard) to accurately detect the tube location outside of the trachea.

The specificity of each CO2 detection method describes the probability that the CO2 detection method is consistent with non-tracheal tube location for a patient who has an endotracheal tube located outside the trachea (e.g., esophageal intubation).

From intubation until 7 breaths from the ventilator are delivered, approximately 1 minute

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 21, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The authors will share the full de-identified dataset beginning 12 months after publication until 48 months after publication for researchers testing a hypothesis outlined in an institutional review board approved protocol. These data can be accessed by emailing the corresponding author. A signed data access agreement will be required.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

From 12 months after publication until 48 months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers testing a hypothesis outlined in an institutional review board approved protocol can access the full de-identified dataset. These data can be accessed by emailing the corresponding author. A signed data access agreement will be required.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Colorimetric carbon dioxide (CO2) detection

Subscribe