Functional Appliance Effects on Mandibular Soft Tissues

April 11, 2025 updated by: Seda Sağoğlu, Konya Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi

Evaluation of Mandibular Soft Tissue Changes in Patients Using Functional Appliances

This study aimed to evaluate the changes in mandibular and cervical soft tissues in Class II patients with mandibular retrognathia treated with the Twin Block appliance, compared to skeletal Class I patients without functional treatment, using profile photographs and cephalometric films. Sixteen patients with Class II Division 1, fifteen with Class II Division 2, and fifteen with skeletal Class I malocclusion were included. Measurements were performed at the beginning of treatment and after functional therapy. In the Class II Div 1 group, most parameters showed significant reductions, except for neck length and jaw tip contour. In the Class II Div 2 group, only the Sm-E plane measurement remained unchanged, while the control group showed minimal changes. Between-group comparisons indicated significant improvements in cervicomental angle, lip-jaw-throat angle, and other lower face soft tissue parameters, especially in Class II Division 1 patients. The findings suggest that Twin Block therapy effectively improves both skeletal and soft tissue profiles, with more pronounced soft tissue enhancement in Class II Division 1 cases.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This retrospective study aims to investigate the changes in the mandibular and cervical soft tissues of patients with Class II malocclusion and mandibular retrognathia treated with the Twin Block appliance. The study includes patients treated in the Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, XXXX University, between 2021 and 2023. Ethical approval was obtained from the relevant ethics committee (Decision No: 2023/351), and informed consent was secured from all participants and their parents.

A total of 46 individuals were included: 16 patients with Class II Division I malocclusion, 15 with Class II Division II malocclusion, and 15 control subjects with skeletal Class I malocclusion. All patients in the treatment groups were in the growth spurt phase (CVMS3-S4) and received Twin Block therapy full-time for 12 months. The control group received fixed orthodontic treatment without functional appliances.

Profile photographs and lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained at the beginning of treatment (T1) and after 1 year of therapy (T2), using a standardized protocol in natural head position (NHP). Measurements were performed digitally using Dolphin Imaging software. The study assessed angular parameters such as the submental-facial angle, cervicomental angle, lip-jaw-throat angle, and Sm-E plane angle from photographs, as well as linear measurements from cephalometric radiographs, including throat length, jaw tip contour, soft tissue pogonion thickness, soft tissue menton thickness, and lower lip-pogonion distance.

Sample size was determined via power analysis, which indicated that 15 patients per group were sufficient to detect clinically meaningful differences. To ensure measurement reliability, cephalometric analyses were repeated, and intra-observer reliability was confirmed with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.924.

Statistical analyses were conducted using R software. Paired t-tests were employed for within-group comparisons, while independent t-tests and ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc tests were used for intergroup comparisons. Mixed-effects models and chi-square tests were utilized where appropriate. A significance level of p < 0.05 was adopted for all analyses.

This study was designed to contribute to the understanding of how Twin Block functional appliance therapy influences the morphology of the mandibular and cervical soft tissues, using both photographic and radiographic assessments in a growing patient population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Meram
      • Konya, Meram, Turkey, 42090
        • Necmettin Erbakan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • having Class II malocclusion caused by mandibular retrognathia (ANB > 4°, SNB<78°),
  • exhibiting horizontal and/or normal growth pattern (SN-GoGn=32 ±6),
  • having profile photographs and cephalometric radiographs taken in the NHP (using the self-balance method one of the dynamic approaches for determining NHP)15,
  • not requiring rapid maxillary expansion,
  • not having increased initial lower incisor inclination on lateral cephalometric radiographs,
  • Class II Division 2 patients presenting with ≥4 mm deepbite and the absence of any prior upper incisor protrusion methods,
  • the control group individuals were required to have a skeletal Class I pattern (ANB angle between 0-4°) without any dental deficiencies.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous orthodontic treatment,
  • presence of craniofacial anomalies involving the jaw and/or teeth,
  • severe facial asymmetry

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Class II Division I malocclusion caused by mandibular retrognathia
Class II Division I patients treated with the Twin Block appliance
An appliance that facilitates forward positioning of the mandible and soft tissues
Experimental: Class II Division II malocclusion caused by mandibular retrognathia
Class II Division II patients treated with the Twin Block appliance
An appliance that facilitates forward positioning of the mandible and soft tissues
Experimental: Skeletal Class I patients
Class I patients who received fixed treatment
Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients treated with the Twin Block appliance
Time Frame: 12 month
The changes in certain angular (degrees) and linear (millimeters) measurements may be considered favorable for the mandibular soft tissues.
12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Seda Sağoğlu, Konya Necmettin Erbaka University Faculty of Dentistry

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 25, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 28, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 24, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Study Data/Documents

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mandibular Retrognathism

Clinical Trials on Twin block appliance

Subscribe