Prospective, Long-term Evaluation of the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA Valve (RESOUND-EU)

SAPIEN Ultra RESILIA Durability EU Registry - The RESOUND-EU Registry

Evaluation of clinical outcomes and valve performance of the SAPIEN 3 Ultra Resilia (S3UR) valve over 10 years.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) has become the gold standard treatment for moderate-to-high risk elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Based on the results of randomized trials including low risk patients, this treatment has been progressively applied to younger (in the sixties and seventies) patients with a low co-morbidity burden. Life expectancy in this group is expected to extend beyond 5 years from intervention in the vast majority of patients, and beyond 10 years in a high proportion. Thus, the issue of valve durability has become one of the most important aspects in the TAVI field in recent years. To date, the rates of bioprosthetic valve failure at 8-10 years after TAVI have been consistently <10%, but some studies have shown some degree of valve structural degeneration in close to one third of the patients at 8-year follow-up. This subclinical valve degeneration before the 10-year follow-up landmark would represent the initial step in the process of bioprosthetic valve failure, and further valve degeneration leading to clinical symptoms is likely to occur in a significant proportion of these cases.

This prospective registry will evaluate the clinical outcomes and the valve performance of the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA valve over 10 years.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • North Rhine-Westphalia
      • Bad Oeynhausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 32545
        • Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patiets with severe aortic stenosis planned to undergo TAVR on their native valve with a SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA Valve.

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Adult patients (≥18 years)
  • Patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVI on their native valve with S3UR valve
  • Patient is willing to attend the follow-up visits up to 10 years at the center

Exclusion criteria:

  • Lack of written informed consent
  • Emergency procedure
  • Pregnancy at time of TAVI

Critieria for long-term observation (1y-10y):

  • Technical success at exit from procedure room (VARC-3):

    • Freedom from mortality
    • Successful access, delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system
    • Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location
    • Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device (excluding permanent pacemaker or PTA and stenting without major bleeding) or to a major vascular or access related, or cardiac structural complication
  • Absence of the following severe procedural and in-hospital complications (VARC-3 definitions):

    • All stroke
    • Bleeding type 3-4
    • Myocardial infarction
    • Need for a second valve
    • Valve embolization
    • Coronary obstruction
    • Annular rupture

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
TAVI Patients
Adult patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVI on their native valve with S3UR valve
Elective transfemoral TAVi procedure with S3UR valve.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early Safety
Time Frame: 1-3 months
Early safety acc. to VARC-3
1-3 months
Device Success
Time Frame: 1-3 months
Device Success acc. to VARC-3
1-3 months
Bioprosthetic Valve Failure
Time Frame: 3-5 years
Bioprosthetic valve failure (defined as valve-related mortality OR aortic valve re-operations/re-intervention OR stage 3 hemodynamic valve deterioration (VARC-3))
3-5 years
Bioprosthetic Valve Failure
Time Frame: 9-10 years
Bioprosthetic valve failure (defined as valve-related mortality OR aortic valve re-operation/re-intervention OR stage 3 hemodynamic valve deterioration (VARC-3))
9-10 years
Structural Valve Deterioration
Time Frame: 9-10 years
Structural Valve Deterioration ≥ stage 2 (VARC-3)
9-10 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hemodynamic Valve Performance
Time Frame: All follow-ups (1-3 month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8 year, 9-10 year)
  • Prosthetic valve regurgitation including paravalvular regurgitation
  • Mean transvalvular gradient
  • Max transvalvular gradient
  • Effective orifice area
All follow-ups (1-3 month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8 year, 9-10 year)
Bioprosthetic Valve Failure
Time Frame: All follow-ups (1-3month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8year 9-10 year)
Bioprosthetic Valve Failure acc. to VARC-3
All follow-ups (1-3month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8year 9-10 year)
Bioprosthetic Valve Dysfunction
Time Frame: All follow-ups (1-3month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8year, 9-10 year)
BVD acc. to VARC-3
All follow-ups (1-3month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8year, 9-10 year)
Patient reported outcomes
Time Frame: 1-3month, 1+3year Follow Up compared to BL
Patient reported outcomes using TASQ questionnaire and EQ-5D questionnaire
1-3month, 1+3year Follow Up compared to BL
Cumulated incidence rate BVD or BVF
Time Frame: Up to 10 years
Cumulated incidence rate (per 100 patient-years) of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (stage 2 or 3) OR bioprosthetic valve failure up to 10-year follow-up
Up to 10 years
Clinical Events
Time Frame: All follow-ups (1-3month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8year, 9-10 year)
Clinical events (mortality, stroke, bleeding type 2-4, cardiac rehospitalization, heart failure rehospitalization)
All follow-ups (1-3month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8year, 9-10 year)
Hemodynamic valve deterioration stage 2 and 3 (VARC-3)
Time Frame: All follow-ups (1-3 month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8 year, 9-10 year)
HVD stage 2 and 3 according to VARC-3 Criteria (moderate and severe HVD).
All follow-ups (1-3 month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8 year, 9-10 year)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall kidney function
Time Frame: All follow-ups (1-3month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8year, 9-10 year)
Kidney function assessed through lab values: eGFR in ml/min/1,73m2; creatinine in mg/dl or micromol/l; albumin-to-creatinin-ratio in mg/g; serum calcium in mg/dl or millimol/l ; serum phosphate in mg/dl or millimol/l ; PTH intact in pmol/l, pg/ml or ng/l; Hb in g/l, g/dl, millimol/l
All follow-ups (1-3month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8year, 9-10 year)
Overall Lipid Status
Time Frame: All follow-ups (1-3month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8year, 9-10 year)
Lipid status assessed through lab values: total cholesterol in mg/dl, millimol/l or micromol/l; LDL in millimol/l or micromol/l; HDL millimol/l or micromol/l;Triglycerides in mg/dl, millimol/l or micromol/l; latest HbA1c in %; Lp(a) in mg/dl or nmol/l
All follow-ups (1-3month, 1year, 3-5 year, 6-8year, 9-10 year)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tanja Rudolph, Prof., Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia University Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Joner, Prof, German Heart Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2037

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2037

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

no individual participant data (IPD) will be shard

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Insufficiency

Clinical Trials on Transcatheter aortic valve (S3UR) replacement (TAVR)

Subscribe