REhabilitation of MEMory Symptoms After BRain Concussion (REMEMBR)

May 29, 2026 updated by: Noah Silverberg, University of British Columbia
Persistent memory symptoms after concussion are common, and likely perpetuated by unhelpful illness beliefs and coping behaviors. Results from a pilot study suggested that traditional cognitive rehabilitation and a novel cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) protocol were both associated with improvements in subjective memory functioning. The present study will more definitively compare the effectiveness of these interventions for improving subjective memory functioning after concussion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary research aims of this study are to determine whether cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and cognitive compensatory strategy training (CCST) improves subjective memory functioning compared to usual care, and to compare the effectiveness of CBT and CCST. This study is a multisite three-armed randomized control trial (RCT) that will randomize adults with persistent memory symptoms following concussion to CBT, CCST, or a covert waitlist condition (2:2:1). Participants will be blinded to the other arms of the study and the study hypotheses.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

184

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Alberta
    • British Columbia
      • Langley, British Columbia, Canada, V1M 4A6
        • Recruiting
        • Fraser Health Acquired Brain Injury and Concussion Services
        • Contact:
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 2G9
        • Recruiting
        • G.F. Strong Adult Concussion Services
        • Contact:
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3Z5
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Integrated Adult Concussion Program at Hamilton Health Sciences
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 7X7
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2A2
        • Recruiting
        • Hull-Ellis Concussion and Research Clinic at University Health Network
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-59
  2. Concussion diagnosis confirmed with structured interview based on American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine diagnostic criteria
  3. Concussion occurred between 6 and 36 months before enrollment
  4. Ongoing memory concerns
  5. Fluent in English
  6. Stable access to a computer, tablet, or smartphone with internet capability

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Fail performance validity testing
  2. Comorbid psychiatric or neurological disorder or is taking a medication that could fully account for their memory symptoms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Waitlist - Usual care
Experimental: Cognitive behavioral therapy
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is delivered by a psychologist over 10 individual (1:1) manualized videoconference sessions. The goal of this therapy is for participants to use their memory more normally (i.e., reduce avoidance and safety behaviors) and view memory lapses as less threatening.
Active Comparator: Cognitive rehabilitation
Cognitive compensatory strategy training (CCST), a traditional cognitive rehabilitation intervention, is delivered by a Occupational Therapist over 10 individual (1:1) manualized videoconference sessions. Participants optimize their use of current compensatory strategies and/or learn new ones suited to their needs and lifestyle. The goal is to minimize memory lapses in daily life.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire-Satisfaction scale
Time Frame: Week 20
Measures participants' concern, satisfaction, and overall appraisal of their memory ability. Participants rate their agreement with 18 statements. Total scores range from 0 to 72, with lower total scores indicating worse subjective memory functioning.
Week 20

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fear-Avoidance of Memory Loss Scale
Time Frame: Week 1 and week 20
Assesses fears and avoidance behaviors associated with memory decline. Participants rate 24 items on a 5-point scale, where the higher scores indicate greater memory concern and maladaptive coping.
Week 1 and week 20
Patient Global Impression of Change scale
Time Frame: Week 20
Participants rate how much their memory functioning has improved or declined overall since the beginning of the study, on a single item rated on a 7-point scale where the midpoint is no change.
Week 20
Work and Social Adjustment Scale
Time Frame: Week 1 and week 20
Participants rate how much their condition interferes with their ability to carry out occupational and social activities across 5 items, on a scale from 1-7 where higher scores indicate more difficulty.
Week 1 and week 20

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Noah D Silverberg, PhD, University of British Columbia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 2, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Cognitive behavioral therapy

Subscribe