Dexamethasone Versus Dexmedetomidine in IPACK Block to Reduce Pain Post Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries

June 15, 2025 updated by: Ain Shams University

Effect of Dexamethasone Versus Dexmedetomidine as A Local Anesthetic Adjuvant In IPACK Block for Post Operative Analgesia Following Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries

The investigators will test the effects of dexamethasone versus dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to bupivacaine in IPACK Block and it's direct effect in decreasing pain post operative following Arthroscopic knee surgeries

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A.Preoperative settings: All patients will be assessed preoperatively by careful history taking, full physical examination, and laboratory evaluation. An informed written consent will be taken from every patient just before the surgery. B.Intraoperative and postoperative settings: On arrival to the operating room, baseline parameters such as ECG, mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation will be recorded. Intravenous line will be inserted and IV Ringer's solution will be started, 500ml bolus will be given as a preload over 20 min before performing spinal anaesthesia and maintenance volume of 10ml\kg. For each group, patients will be put in supine position, the procedure will be performed under complete aseptic precautions and All patients will be divided into three groups:(Group 1) for iPACK block with 0.25% bupivacaine only. (Group 2) for iPACK block with 0.25% bupivacaine and dexamthasone and (Group 3) for iPACK block with 0.25% bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, Egypt
        • Ain Shams University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physical status: ASA I,II. Both sexes. BMI<35

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of the procedure or participation in the study by the patient. Physical status: ASA III or Above. History of allergy to the study drug. Evidence of local infection at site of injection. Major hepatic, renal, or cardiovascular dysfunction. BMI>35.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: (Group 1) for iPACK block with 0.25% bupivacaine only. (Group 2) for iPACK block with 0.25% bupivac
For each group, patients will be put in supine position, the procedure will be performed under complete aseptic precautions and All patients will be divided into three groups:(Group 1) for iPACK block with 0.25% bupivacaine only. (Group 2) for iPACK block with 0.25% bupivacaine and dexamthasone and (Group 3) for iPACK block with 0.25% bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine .
Blocks will be carried out with the patient supine with the operative leg externally rotated and slightly flexed at the knee or in prone position.with Ultrasound device with a high-frequency (6-13 MHz) linear probe using in plane lateral to medial approach and this will be done by a senior staff anaesthesia physician skilled in ultrasound guided regional anaesthesia.
patients will be put in supine position, the procedure will be performed under complete aseptic precautions and All patients will be divided into three groups:(Group 1) for iPACK block with 0.25% bupivacaine only. (Group 2) for iPACK block with 0.25% bupivacaine and dexamthasone and (Group 3) for iPACK block with 0.25% bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of Dexamethasone versus Dexmedetomidine in IPACK Block to reduce pain post Arthroscopic knee surgeries
Time Frame: 45 minutes after spinal anaesthesia

postoperative analgesic effect will be assessed by the time till first analgesic requirement which is defined as the time (in hours) after finishing of ultrasound guided iPACK block till the patient's requirement for first analgesia postoperative in ward.

Postoperative pain will be assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) up to 24 h after surgery. Whenever VAS score reached ≥ 4, rescue analgesia will be given in the form of iv injection diclofenac sodium 75 mg. Time to the first dose of diclofenac sodium postoperatively will be recorded

45 minutes after spinal anaesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect Of Dexamethasone Versus Dexmedetomidine as A Local Anesthetic Adjuvant In IPACK Block for Post Operative Analgesia following Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries
Time Frame: 45 minutes after spinal anesthesia

Total analgesics consumption (in mg.) over 24-hour period post-operative.

Incidence of adverse effects such as:

Hematoma, hypotension (considered as significant hypotension when blood pressure decrease by 20% relative to baseline), bradycardia (considered as significant bradycardia when heart rate decrease by 20% relative to baseline), nausea and/or vomiting, local anesthetic toxicity, post operative paresthesia, sedation (assessed by Ramsay sedation score) and hypoxemia (Spao2<90%) will be recorded in both groups and will be properly managed by fluid reuscitation, oxygen support, vasopressor and proton pump inhibitors.

Post-operative ambulation enhancement in the form of: time of start of ambulation (in hours) starting from end of surgery- walking- climbing stairs (according to the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System)

45 minutes after spinal anesthesia

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maisa Essam Abdelhaleem, MBBCH, Ain Shams University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 3, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 3, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All data will be shared once study is completed

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Before 1/2026

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Free

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Efficacy of Drugs in Pain Management

Subscribe