Effect of Intermittent Normobaric Hypoxia on Executive Functions

June 16, 2025 updated by: Raquel Vaquero-Cristóbal, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia

Effect of Intermittent Normobaric Hypoxia on Executive Functions Assessed With Different Cognitive Tests in Healthy Young Subjects

The main objective of this study was to analyze the effects of an intermittent normobaric hypoxia session on executive functions assessed with different cognitive tests given to healthy young subjects. Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were divided into an experimental group (EG; n=13) and a control group (CG; n=14). The EG performed the 'Odd One Out', 'Double Trouble' and 'Monkey Ladder' tests before and after the hypoxia tolerance session (12%, 4400 m) with the iAltitude simulator. The CG completed the same tests without hypoxia exposure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The main objective of this study will be to analyze the effects of an intermittent normobaric hypoxia session on executive functions, assessed using different cognitive tests administered to healthy young subjects. A total of 27 healthy volunteers will be divided into two groups: an experimental group (EG; n=13) and a control group (CG; n=14).

The experimental group will perform the 'Odd One Out', 'Double Trouble', and 'Monkey Ladder' tests immediately before and after a hypoxia tolerance session (12% oxygen, equivalent to 4400 meters) using the iAltitude simulator. The control group will complete the same tests under normoxic conditions, without exposure to hypoxia.

The primary outcomes will include changes in cognitive performance scores in the administered tests. The experimental group is expected to show improvements in the Double Trouble test scores following hypoxia exposure. The control group may also show changes in the Double Trouble and Odd One Out tests between the pre- and post-tests.

Secondary outcomes will include physiological variables such as oxygen saturation (SaO₂) and heart rate (HR), which will be monitored during the hypoxia session in the EG. Statistically significant changes in SaO₂ and HR are anticipated as a result of the hypoxic exposure.

This study aims to determine whether a single session of intermittent normobaric hypoxia can lead to selective improvements in executive functions, particularly sustained attention, without negatively affecting other cognitive domains.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Murcia, Spain
        • Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
    • Guadalupe
      • Murcia, Guadalupe, Spain, 30107
        • Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Young people aged between 18 and 40 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Prior experience in hypoxia training
  • Previous experience in executive function tests
  • Personal or family history of cardiovascular diseases or chronic conditions
  • Diagnosed cardiac disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intermittent Hypoxia Group
Participants are exposed to a single session of intermittent normobaric hypoxia at 12% oxygen concentration (equivalent to 4400 m altitude) using the iAltitude simulator. Cognitive tests are performed before and after the hypoxia session.
Participants in the experimental group undergo a single session of intermittent normobaric hypoxia simulated by the iAltitude device. The session consists of breathing air with 12% oxygen concentration (equivalent to 4400 meters altitude) for a specified duration. Cognitive tests are administered before and after the hypoxia exposure to assess executive functions.
Other: No Hypoxia Group
Participants undergo the same cognitive tests without exposure to hypoxia, serving as the control condition.
Participants undergo the same cognitive tests without exposure to hypoxia, serving as the control condition.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Double Trouble Test
Time Frame: Day 1
Change in cognitive performance score on the Double Trouble test; higher scores indicate better executive function and attention control. Unit of Measure: Score (units on a scale)
Day 1
Monkey Ladder Test
Time Frame: Day 1
Change in cognitive performance score on the Monkey Ladder test; higher scores indicate better visuospatial working memory. Unit of Measure: Score and Level.
Day 1
Odd One Out Test
Time Frame: Day 1
Change in reasoning performance score on the Odd One Out test; higher scores indicate better problem-solving ability. Unit of Measure: Score and Level.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Day 1
Average of systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured in mmHg
Day 1
Oxygen Saturation
Time Frame: During intervention
Oxygen saturation automatically monitored and recorded by the iAltitude hypoxia simulation system. Unit of Measure: %
During intervention
Heart Rate
Time Frame: During intervention
Heart rate automatically monitored and recorded by the iAltitude hypoxia simulation system. Unit of Measure: Beats per minute (bpm)
During intervention
Sociodemographic Questionnaire
Time Frame: Pre-test
To define individual characteristics of participants such as age and gender.
Pre-test

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Raquel Vaquero Cristóbal, PhD, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 4145/2022

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared due to ethical and privacy considerations.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Executive Function (Cognition)

Clinical Trials on Intermittent normobaric hypoxia

Subscribe