The Impacts of Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain on Cognitive Functions of Older Adults: A Longitudinal Study

August 14, 2025 updated by: HSU Chun Liang, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a common condition among older adults and has been associated with an increased risk of executive function impairment. Research shows that older adults experiencing chronic pain are more likely to show worse cognitive performance compared to healthy individuals. While there is a bidirectional relationship between pain and executive functions, cognitive performance especially for some executive functions (e.g. inhibition, switching, working memory) is crucial for managing pain in older adults. Furthermore, executive dysfunctions are associated with decline in functional status among the population, particularly in performing instrumental activities in daily living. Therefore, maintaining executive function emerges as a pivotal consideration for older adults with CNSLBP.

Studies provide preliminary evidence that connects brain changes with chronic pain and cognitive functions. For instance, multisite chronic pain may increase the risk of cognitive decline through structural changes like hippocampal atrophy. Besides, functional brain changes in chronic pain may reduce deactivation several key default mode network regions, predisposing individuals to cognitive impairments. Despite the aforementioned brain changes, no direct evidence supports the hypothesis that structural and functional brain changes caused by CNSLBP in older adults may be associated with cognitive decline. It remains unclear that whether structural changes (e.g. reduced hippocampal, cerebellar gray matter, white matter volume in the right frontal region) and/or functional changes (e.g. deactivation of default mode network regions, heightened activation in the anterior cingulate cortex) cause by CNSLBP are associated with cognitive decline. With neuroimaging techniques, brain mechanisms connecting CNSLBP and executive function deficits can be explained.

To deepen understanding of the brain mechanisms underlying executive function decline in older adults with CNSLBP, this study will directly compare pain intensity, executive functions, brain structure, and functional changes of the brain between older adults with CNSLBP and age-matched healthy controls. A longitudinal approach is established to quantify the relationship between CNSLBP-related brain changes and executive functions in older adults, providing insights into the development of new treatment strategies to improve or prevent executive function decline in older adults with CNSLBP.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Rehabilitation Sciences
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) should have:

  • CNSLBP that has lasted for at least 3 months, typically occurs in the area between the 12th rib to the iliac crest with and without leg pain and without a known pathoanatomical cause;
  • an average pain intensity of ≥ 5 out of 10 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) in the last 7 days, where 0 means "no pain" and 10 means "worst pain imaginable"; and
  • pain occurring more than 3 days per week. In addition, healthy controls should not have CNSLBP in the last 36 months.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older adults with and without chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) aged between 60 and 85 years
  • Having normal cognitive function (Hong Kong Montreal Cognitive Assessment ≥ 26)13
  • Right-handed
  • Cantonese speaking
  • Having at least 6 years of formal education and know how to read and write Chinese
  • Agreeing to sign an informed consent form
  • Being able to communicate via email or text message because several study measures will be collected electronically.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to ambulate without assistance from another person (canes or walkers will be allowed)
  • Having specific causes of LBP (e.g., spinal stenosis, lumbar disc herniation, spondylolisthesis, recent vertebral fracture, spinal infection)
  • Having other concurrent musculoskeletal conditions at other body parts (e.g., fibromyalgia, or neck or knee pain)
  • Self-reported history of lumbar or lower extremity surgery
  • Self-reported history of neurological or psychiatric disorders (e.g., stroke, brain surgery, head trauma; schizophrenia, multiple personality disorder, dissociative identity disorder, stroke) or self-reported cancer history
  • Self-reported specific inflammatory disorder: rheumatoid arthritis, rheumatica, scleroderma, lupus, or polymyositis
  • Unexplained, unintended weight loss of 20 lbs or more in the past year
  • Cauda equina syndrome
  • Uncorrected visual deficit
  • Drug or alcohol addiction
  • Taking alcohol, opioids or benzodiazepines medicines 24 hours before the experiment
  • Claustrophobia
  • Contraindications for undergoing the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination based on the MRI safety screening form of University Research Facility in Behavioral and Systems Neuroscience at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Healthy group
Healthy controls should not have CNSLBP in the last 36 months.
For observational studies, participants are not assigned an intervention as part of the study.
Chronic non-specific low back pain group
Participants with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) should have: (1) CNSLBP that has lasted for at least 3 months, typically occurs in the area between the 12th rib to the iliac crest may or may not accompanied by leg pain and without a known pathoanatomical cause; (2) an average pain intensity of ≥ 5 out of 10 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) in the last 7 days, where 0 means "no pain"and 10 means "worst pain imaginable"; and (3) pain occurring more than 3 days per week.
For observational studies, participants are not assigned an intervention as part of the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity assessment
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
11-point numerical rating scale, ranged from 0 to 10, higher scores indicate higher pain intensity.
Baseline and 6 months
Brain imaging
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months
Perform the following MRI sequences: T1-weighted, T2-weighted, DTI (diffusion tensor imaging), resting-state fMRI, and task-related fMRI.
Baseline, 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression, anxiety, and stress test
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
The Chinese version of the short Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, scores ranged from 0 to 13, higher scores for each domain (depression, anxiety, and stress) indicate more respective problems.
Baseline and 6 months
Disability evaluation
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
The Hong Kong Chinese Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire has 24 items. Scores ranged from 0 to 24, higher scores indicate worse disability.
Baseline and 6 months
Cognitive flexibility test inside magnetic resonance imaging scanning
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
The More Odd Shifting task, It requires participants to switch between different mental sets or rules, such as identifying odd numbers or shifting between different categories. Better response accuracy indicates better cognitive flexibility
Baseline and 6 months
Perseveration and abstract reasoning test outside magnetic resonance imaging scanning
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
The Modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, more correct matching of cards indicate better perseveration and abstract reasoning.
Baseline and 6 months
Working memory Test outside magnetic resonance imaging scanning
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
The Verbal Digits Forward and Backward Test, more correct recall of digits indicate better working memory and executive function
Baseline and 6 months
Cognitive flexibility test outside magnetic resonance imaging scanning
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
The Trail Making Tests, a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching, completing the trail correctly within a shorter period of time means better cognitive flexibility.
Baseline and 6 months
Inhibition test outside magnetic resonance imaging scanning
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Go/NoGo task, more response accuracy indicates better control of inhibition.
Baseline and 6 months
Pain catastrophizing assessment
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
The Chinese version of Pain Catastrophizing Score. The scores ranged from 0 to 13, higher scores indicate more pain catatrophizing thought.
Baseline and 6 months
Frailty status assessment
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness, and Loss, the presence of 3 of 5 item characteristics indicate the presence of frailty, scores ranged from 0 to 5. Lower scores mean more frailty.
Baseline and 6 months
Sleep quality assessment
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. It has 7 domains to measure sleep quality , sleep latency, sleep duration, habital sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. Scores ranged from 0 to 21, higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality.
Baseline and 6 months
Cognitive function screening
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Hong Kong Montreal Cognitive Assessment. It is a cognitive screening tool specifically adapted for Chinese older adults in Hong Kong. It is designed to detect mild cognitive impairment and dementia. A score < 26 suggests participant has mild cognitive impairment.
Baseline and 6 months
Balance, lower extremity strength and functional capacity assessment
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). It consists of three components: balance test, gait speed test, and chair stand test. The SPPB scores range from 0 to 12. Individuals with SPPB scores between 10 and 12 can exercise at home and in the community while those with more severe mobility limitations (scores < 10) require further assessment and supervision for exercise.
Baseline and 6 months
Mobility and balance assessment
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. It measures the time taken for an individual to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down again. The TUG test helps identify individuals at risk of falls and mobility impairments. A shorter completion time indicates a better balance and functional mobility.
Baseline and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chun Liang HSU, PhD, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 6, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Older Adults

Clinical Trials on Participants are not assigned an intervention

Subscribe