Investigation of Cerebral Motor Activity Modulations Following Median Nerve Stimulation During General Anaesthesia

February 15, 2023 updated by: Denis SCHMARTZ, Brugmann University Hospital

Study of Modulations of Motor Brain Activity Following Stimulation of the Median Nerve During General Anesthesia

Accidental Awareness during General Anesthesia (AAGA) occurs in 1-2% of high-risk practice patients and is a cause of severe psychological trauma, termed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Actually, no monitoring techniques can accurately predict or detect an AAGA. Since the first reflex for a patient during an AAGA is to move, a brain-computer interface (BCI) based on the detection of an intention of movement would be conceivable to alert the anesthetist. The investigators previously showed that median nerve stimulation (MNS) could be the keystone of a BCI specialized in the detection of movement intention. Indeed, based on these previous results, the investigators can envisage a routine system where the patient would be stimulated at the median nerve position, while a BCI device would analyze the event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (ERS) modulations in the motor cortex to check whether the patient is intending to move or not. According to the investigator's knowledge, no published studies have investigated the detection of EEG patterns in relation to peripheral nerve stimulation over the sensorimotor cortex during general anesthesia. The main objective of this study is to describe the changes in terms of ERD and ERS modulations, in the EEG signal over the motor cortex, during general anesthesia with propofol, while a median nerve stimulation is performed.

STIM-MOTANA is an interventional and prospective study conducted in patients scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia, involving EEG measurements and median nerve stimulation. In this study, 30 patients will undergo surgery under total intravenous anesthesia using a propofol target-controlled infusion pump. The rest of the anesthetic protocol will be at the discretion of the anesthesiologist in charge. Changes in ERD and ERS during median nerve stimulation according to the various propofol concentrations will be continuously monitored by an EEG amplifier. Pre- and post-injection comparisons of propofol will be performed by paired series tests. After surgery, patients will have a gradual decrease of propofol at different effect-site concentrations (from 4.0 μg/ml to 2.0 μg/ml, in increments of 0.5 μg/ml).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium, 1020
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Brugmann

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 81 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients >18 years and <81 years
  • Right-handed
  • Programmed for surgery with the use of an intravenous anesthesia with a propofol concentration objective

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to propofol, soy or peanuts
  • BMI<20 or >30
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Adult unable to give consent
  • Medical or surgical history that may interfere with median nerve stimulation or the obtention of the EEG signal (for example: diabetes, polyneuropathy, central neurodegenerative disease, epilepsy, brain surgery)
  • History of right median nerve injury
  • Amputation of the upper right limb
  • Impossibility of affixing an EEG helmet
  • Addiction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Median nerve stimulation
STIM-MOTANA is an interventional and prospective study conducted in patients scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia, involving EEG measurements and median nerve stimulation. In this study, 30 patients will undergo surgery under total intravenous anesthesia using a propofol target-controlled infusion pump. The rest of the anesthetic protocol will be at the discretion of the anesthesiologist in charge. After surgery, patients will have a gradual decrease of propofol at different effect-site concentrations (from 4.0 μg/ml to 2.0 μg/ml, in increments of 0.5 μg/ml).
The right-hand median nerve will be stimulated in the same way as for measurement with a conduction velocity or for an evoked potential. Two stimulation electrodes will be placed on the right-hand wrist according to the standards.The stimulation is transcutaneous and painless using the specific Micromed device Sd Ltm Stim Energy (Micromed, Mˆacon, France). The stimulus intensity will range between 3 and 14 mA. The stimulation duration will be 100 ms with a frequency of 0.1 Hz.
Changes in ERD and ERS patterns during median nerve stimulation according to the various propofol concentrations will be continuously monitored by an EEG amplifier. EEG signals will be acquired using the OpenViBE platform with a Biosemi Active Two 64-channel EEG system, arranged in the Biosemi's ABC system covering the entire scalp at 2048 Hz. Among all recorded sites, some of the electrodes will be localized around the primary motor cortex, the motor cortex, the somatosensory cortex, and the occipital cortex.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Amplitude of the ERD (event-related desynchronization)/ERS (event- related synchronization)
Time Frame: From the time each stimulation is performed until 4 seconds after the stimulation is completed.
The main evaluation outcome will be the amplitude of the ERD (event-related desynchronization)/ERS (event- related synchronization) after median nerve stimulation, within 4 s of the stimulation, at various propofol concentrations. This amplitude will be calculated using a baseline taken before each stimulation. The amplitudes of the ERD and ERS will be extracted. The ERDs and ERSs will be displayed from the time each stimulation is performed until 4 s after the stimulation is completed.
From the time each stimulation is performed until 4 seconds after the stimulation is completed.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection of ERD patterns via new machine-learning algorithms (percent of correct detection)
Time Frame: From the time each stimulation is performed until 4 seconds after the stimulation is completed.
Verify the detection of ERD patterns via new machine-learning algorithms at different propofol concentrations. ERD patterns will be analysed manually, as well as automated by a machine-learning algorythm. Endpoint will be the percentage (%) of correctly identified ERD pattern by the algorythm.
From the time each stimulation is performed until 4 seconds after the stimulation is completed.
Modulation of ERD patterns by anesthetics drugs. Percentage of variation in amplitude.
Time Frame: From the time each stimulation is performed until 4 seconds after the stimulation is completed.
Another secondary criteria will to describe how the ERD generated by an MNS would be modulated by anesthetics drugs. Amplitude of ERD patterns will be recorded (microV) and the effect of anesthetic drugs on this amplitude will be described as percentage change.
From the time each stimulation is performed until 4 seconds after the stimulation is completed.
Detection of ERS patterns via new machine-learning algorithms (percentage of correct detection)
Time Frame: From the time each stimulation is performed until 4 seconds after the stimulation is completed.
Verify the detection of ERS patterns via new machine-learning algorithms at different propofol concentrations. ERS patterns will be analysed manually, as well as automated by a machine-learning algorythm. Endpoint will be the percentage (%) of correctly identified ERS pattern by the algorythm.
From the time each stimulation is performed until 4 seconds after the stimulation is completed.
Modulation of ERS patterns by anesthetics drugs via new machine-learning algorithms (percentage change in amplitude)
Time Frame: From the time each stimulation is performed until 4 seconds after the stimulation is completed.
Another secondary criteria will to describe how the ERS generated by an MNS would be modulated by anesthetics drugs. Amplitude of ERS patterns will be recorded (microV) and the effect of anesthetic drugs on this amplitude will be described as percentage change.
From the time each stimulation is performed until 4 seconds after the stimulation is completed.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Accidental Awareness During General Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Propofol

3
Subscribe