Effectiveness of m-CIMT of the Upper Limb in Acute Post-stroke Patients. (m-CIMT, Modified Constraint-induced Movement Therapy) (m-CIMT)

November 14, 2025 updated by: Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Effectiveness of m-CIMT of the Upper Limb in Acute Post-stroke Patients.

m-CIMT therapy is the restriction of the unaffected upper extremity in conjunction with an upper extremity specific exercise protocol to improve the functionality and use of the affected upper extremity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study consists of a total of 7 days with a total of 3 hours per day of restraint of the unaffected upper limb together with 1 physiotherapy session per day specific to the affected upper limb.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Ines G Garcia, Fisioterapia
  • Phone Number: +34665538737

Study Locations

    • Barcelona
      • Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clinic De Barcelona
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ischaemic stroke.
  • Hospitalised patient (first 15 days).
  • Ability to understand and execute simple instructions.
  • Over 18 years of age.
  • Upper limb motor deficit.
  • Sign the informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable clinical/medical condition.
  • Limitation of the upper limb due to a previous stroke.
  • Strokes affecting both upper limbs bilaterally.
  • Fractures/dislocations in the joints of the affected upper limb that may affect recovery.
  • Severe behavioural disturbance.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
Conventional treatment
Experimental: Experimental
m-CIMT therapy
m-CIMT therapy (healthy side restraint) and a specific upper limb exercise protocol.
Other Names:
  • m-CIMT protocol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer
Time Frame: Basal, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after treatment
The Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale assesses motor function of the arm and hand after stroke. It measures movements, reflexes and coordination, with a maximum score of 66. It is a structure-measuring tool. This scale is scored from 0 to 66 with 66 being the best score.
Basal, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after treatment
Abilhand
Time Frame: Basal, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after treatment
The ABILHAND assesses a person's ability to perform manual activities of daily living. It is based on the patient's perception of the difficulty of these tasks. It is a tool for measuring activity. This scale is scored from 0 to 46 with 46 being the best score.
Basal, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after treatment
Motor Activity Log
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment
The Motor Activity Log (MAL) assesses how much and how well a person uses their affected arm in everyday activities after a stroke. It is based on interviews and rates the Amount of Use and Quality of Movement of the use of the paretic arm in daily life. This scale has two scores, quality and quantity. From 0 to 150 for quantity and from 0 to 150 for quality. 150 being the best result in both cases.
3 months after treatment
Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS)
Time Frame: Basal, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after treatment

The Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) is a questionnaire that assesses the level of physical and mental fatigue in patients with various health conditions. It consists of 10 items that the patient answers according to their recent experience.

This scale has two scores: Mental fatigue from 0 to 25 (sum of items 3, 6, 7, 8 and 9) and physical fatigue from 0 to 25 (sum of items 1, 2, 4, 5 and 10). With 25 being the worst score for both cases.

Basal, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after treatment
Stroke Impact Scale
Time Frame: Basal,immediately after the intervention, 3 months after treatment
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) assesses the difficulty a person has in performing daily activities during the last two weeks after a stroke. The minimum score on this scale is 16 points and the maximum is 80 points, with 80 being the best score.
Basal,immediately after the intervention, 3 months after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Rankin Scale (MRS)
Time Frame: Basal, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after treatment
The modified Rankin Scale (MRS) assesses the degree of disability or dependence in daily activities after a stroke. It ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 5 points. The worst score is 5 points.
Basal, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after treatment
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
Time Frame: Basal, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after treatment
The NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) is a clinical scale that assesses the severity of stroke. It measures functions such as level of consciousness, language, vision, vision, strength, sensation and coordination. This scale is scored from 0 to 42 with 42 being the worst score.
Basal, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 23, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 20, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 20, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

We don't have the url with the information

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Upper Limb Weakness Due to Central Neurologic Injury

Clinical Trials on m-CIMT

Subscribe