Effect of Myofascial Release on Pain, Grip Strength, Manual Dexterity, and Quality of Life in Late-Term Rehabilitation of Hand Flexor Tendon Repairs

November 14, 2025 updated by: Tuğba Çevik, Hasan Kalyoncu University

Myofascial Release

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of myofascial release exercises performed in the late period compared to classical physiotherapy training in individuals with hand flexor tendon repair.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The hand is the organ we use most in our daily activities, sports activities, expressing ourselves, and performing our jobs. Flexor tendon injuries are among the most common injuries to the hand. The incidence of flexor tendon injuries is estimated at 7-14 per 100,000 people. The flexor tendon can be injured by a blunt or sharp instrument, crushed, or torn by avulsion. It is difficult for tendons to heal without surgery after an injury. Because tendons are composed of living cells and connective tissue, healing begins with cells from both inside and outside the tendon when the tendon ends are brought together. However, scar tissue that forms after surgery adheres the repaired tendons to the surrounding area, limiting movement. Therefore, rehabilitation protocols implemented to ensure proper gliding again and postoperative splinting are essential for tendon healing in tendon injuries are crucial. Tendon Rehabilitation Extension block splints should place the wrist in 30 degrees of flexion to reduce tension in flexor tendon repairs and minimize the risk of postoperative tendon rupture, with the metacarpophalangeal joints at 45-70 degrees of flexion and the interphalangeal joints held in near full extension or slight flexion (15 degrees). Sutures are removed two weeks postoperatively. Thanks to advances in biomechanics and clinical research, there is a general understanding that early therapy-guided tendon release is more beneficial than strict immobilization in efforts to achieve maximum functional recovery. Mobilization promotes intrinsic tendon healing, increases tensile strength, and improves tendon glide while reducing adhesion formation. All of this translates to optimized joint motion, fewer flexion contractures, and overall improved functional outcomes. Tendon repair rehabilitation programs are ideally structured to improve overall hand function while facilitating diverse soft tissue injuries. Flexor tendon rehabilitation protocols are broadly divided into three groups: immobilization, early passive mobilization, and early active mobilization. The selection of a rehabilitation protocol should be determined by considering factors such as the patient's age, ability to comply with treatment, and suture strength.

Current techniques in flexor tendon repair have led to advancements in rehabilitation practice, encouraging a shift from passive methods to early, controlled, and more active approaches. Optimal flexor tendon surgery and treatment outcomes depend on a patient-centered protocol rather than a strictly structured protocol.

Individuals aged 18-65 who have suffered a flexor tendon injury and have undergone related surgery, and who have no neurological symptoms in the repaired extremity will be included in the study.

Individuals who have previously undergone hand surgery for any reason other than this injury, who have a comorbid mental, physical, or neurological chronic illness, who have cognitive problems that impede communication, or who have any other problems that impede cooperation will not be included in the study. When we divided the included individuals into two groups, the control group will receive only conventional physiotherapy, while the study group will additionally receive myofascial release exercises. Pre- and post-treatment evaluations will be conducted. The aim of our randomized controlled trial was to investigate the effects of myofascial release on pain, dexterity, function, and quality of life in the late-stage rehabilitation of hand flexor tendon repairs.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Şahinbey
      • Gaziantep, Şahinbey, Turkey (Türkiye), 27100
        • Hasan Kalyoncu University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being between the ages of 18 and 65,
  • Having a hand flexor tendon injury and subsequent surgery,
  • Not having a symptom of deterioration in the extremity being cared for,
  • Having adequate communication skills,
  • Voluntarily participating in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having had previous hand surgery for any reason other than this injury,
  • Having a comorbid mental, physical, or neurological chronic illness,
  • Having cognitive problems that prevent communication,
  • Having any problem that prevents cooperation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fascial mobilization group
This group will get a specific programme that combinated with conventional physiotherapy and myofascial release therapy
Patients in this group will receive training in myofascial release exercises in addition to the exercises in the control group. Similar to the control group, patients in this group will be asked to continue home exercises five times a week for eight weeks after their two-week treatment.The patients in the study group will receive the same treatment, twice a week for 12 weeks, with each session lasting 45 minutes.
Active Comparator: Control group
This group will get conventional physiotherapy that is include range of motion exercises, electrotherapy and resistance exercise training.
Conservative treatment methods such as TENS, Hotpack and normal joint range of motion exercises and tendon gliding exercises and streching exercise will be applied twice a week for 12 weeks, with each session lasting 45 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The pain
Time Frame: through of the study, average 8 weeks
Mc Gill Short Form will used to determine the type and severity of the pain. A short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) has been developed. The main component of the SF-MPQ consists of 15 descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe.
through of the study, average 8 weeks
Grip strength
Time Frame: through of the study, average 8 weeks
A hand dynamometer will be used to measure patients' grip strength. Grip strength is measured with the Jamar hand dynamometer, recommended by the American Association of Hand Therapists (AETD) and whose validity and reliability have been confirmed in numerous studies. This device is considered the gold standard for measuring hand grip strength. Measurements will be taken before and after treatment, and three times, 10 seconds apart. Each measurement will be taken at the same difficulty level. Generally, the average of the three measurements will be taken.
through of the study, average 8 weeks
Hand skills
Time Frame: through of the study, average 8 weeks
The Nine-Hole Peg test, used to assess manual dexterity, involves patients quickly removing nine wooden pegs from a storage box, placing them in random holes, then collecting them from the holes and returning them to the storage compartment. The time is measured in seconds using a stopwatch, and anything over 20 seconds is considered a "loss of skill."
through of the study, average 8 weeks
Short form SF-36 Quality of life
Time Frame: through of the study, average 8 weeks
Individuals' quality of life will be assessed using short form 36 (SF-36). SF-36 is a 36-question scale consisting of physical function, physical role, emotional role, pain, vitality, general health, and mental health subscales.
through of the study, average 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Upper extremity functionality
Time Frame: through of the study, average 8 weeks
The Questionnaire for Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Disabilities (Q-DASH) will be used to assess individuals' upper extremity functions. This questionnaire is a self-administered measurement tool with validated validity and reliability in Turkish. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the DASH questionnaire (DASH-T) was conducted in Turkey by Düger et al. in 2006. The questionnaire, consisting of 30 questions, assesses the individual's ability to perform functional activities (21 items), pain (5 items), and psychosocial aspects of the disease (4 items). The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better outcomes.
through of the study, average 8 weeks
Range of Motion
Time Frame: through of the study, average 8 weeks
A Universal Goniometer will be used to assess normal range of motion. Measurements will be made regarding shoulder flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal and external rotation ranges of motion in three planes of the upper extremity shoulder joint, and the results will be recorded in degrees.
through of the study, average 8 weeks
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: through of the study, average 8 weeks
This is the measure we will use to assess patients' fear of movement in our study. This scale, frequently used in the literature, is based on fear avoidance, fear of work-related activities, and fear of movement or re-injury.
through of the study, average 8 weeks
Daily living activities
Time Frame: through of the study, average 8 weeks
It is a 15-question questionnaire that measures the severity of wrist pain and the level of disability in daily life activities.
through of the study, average 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tuğba Çevik, Hasan Kalyoncu University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Exercise

Clinical Trials on Fascial mobilization therapy

Subscribe