- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07233369
Effect of Myofascial Release on Pain, Grip Strength, Manual Dexterity, and Quality of Life in Late-Term Rehabilitation of Hand Flexor Tendon Repairs
Myofascial Release
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The hand is the organ we use most in our daily activities, sports activities, expressing ourselves, and performing our jobs. Flexor tendon injuries are among the most common injuries to the hand. The incidence of flexor tendon injuries is estimated at 7-14 per 100,000 people. The flexor tendon can be injured by a blunt or sharp instrument, crushed, or torn by avulsion. It is difficult for tendons to heal without surgery after an injury. Because tendons are composed of living cells and connective tissue, healing begins with cells from both inside and outside the tendon when the tendon ends are brought together. However, scar tissue that forms after surgery adheres the repaired tendons to the surrounding area, limiting movement. Therefore, rehabilitation protocols implemented to ensure proper gliding again and postoperative splinting are essential for tendon healing in tendon injuries are crucial. Tendon Rehabilitation Extension block splints should place the wrist in 30 degrees of flexion to reduce tension in flexor tendon repairs and minimize the risk of postoperative tendon rupture, with the metacarpophalangeal joints at 45-70 degrees of flexion and the interphalangeal joints held in near full extension or slight flexion (15 degrees). Sutures are removed two weeks postoperatively. Thanks to advances in biomechanics and clinical research, there is a general understanding that early therapy-guided tendon release is more beneficial than strict immobilization in efforts to achieve maximum functional recovery. Mobilization promotes intrinsic tendon healing, increases tensile strength, and improves tendon glide while reducing adhesion formation. All of this translates to optimized joint motion, fewer flexion contractures, and overall improved functional outcomes. Tendon repair rehabilitation programs are ideally structured to improve overall hand function while facilitating diverse soft tissue injuries. Flexor tendon rehabilitation protocols are broadly divided into three groups: immobilization, early passive mobilization, and early active mobilization. The selection of a rehabilitation protocol should be determined by considering factors such as the patient's age, ability to comply with treatment, and suture strength.
Current techniques in flexor tendon repair have led to advancements in rehabilitation practice, encouraging a shift from passive methods to early, controlled, and more active approaches. Optimal flexor tendon surgery and treatment outcomes depend on a patient-centered protocol rather than a strictly structured protocol.
Individuals aged 18-65 who have suffered a flexor tendon injury and have undergone related surgery, and who have no neurological symptoms in the repaired extremity will be included in the study.
Individuals who have previously undergone hand surgery for any reason other than this injury, who have a comorbid mental, physical, or neurological chronic illness, who have cognitive problems that impede communication, or who have any other problems that impede cooperation will not be included in the study. When we divided the included individuals into two groups, the control group will receive only conventional physiotherapy, while the study group will additionally receive myofascial release exercises. Pre- and post-treatment evaluations will be conducted. The aim of our randomized controlled trial was to investigate the effects of myofascial release on pain, dexterity, function, and quality of life in the late-stage rehabilitation of hand flexor tendon repairs.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Tuğba Çevik, PT
- Phone Number: 05345251455
- Email: cvktubaa@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Şahinbey
-
Gaziantep, Şahinbey, Turkey (Türkiye), 27100
- Hasan Kalyoncu University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being between the ages of 18 and 65,
- Having a hand flexor tendon injury and subsequent surgery,
- Not having a symptom of deterioration in the extremity being cared for,
- Having adequate communication skills,
- Voluntarily participating in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having had previous hand surgery for any reason other than this injury,
- Having a comorbid mental, physical, or neurological chronic illness,
- Having cognitive problems that prevent communication,
- Having any problem that prevents cooperation.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Fascial mobilization group
This group will get a specific programme that combinated with conventional physiotherapy and myofascial release therapy
|
Patients in this group will receive training in myofascial release exercises in addition to the exercises in the control group.
Similar to the control group, patients in this group will be asked to continue home exercises five times a week for eight weeks after their two-week treatment.The patients in the study group will receive the same treatment, twice a week for 12 weeks, with each session lasting 45 minutes.
|
|
Active Comparator: Control group
This group will get conventional physiotherapy that is include range of motion exercises, electrotherapy and resistance exercise training.
|
Conservative treatment methods such as TENS, Hotpack and normal joint range of motion exercises and tendon gliding exercises and streching exercise will be applied twice a week for 12 weeks, with each session lasting 45 minutes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The pain
Time Frame: through of the study, average 8 weeks
|
Mc Gill Short Form will used to determine the type and severity of the pain.
A short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) has been developed.
The main component of the SF-MPQ consists of 15 descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe.
|
through of the study, average 8 weeks
|
|
Grip strength
Time Frame: through of the study, average 8 weeks
|
A hand dynamometer will be used to measure patients' grip strength.
Grip strength is measured with the Jamar hand dynamometer, recommended by the American Association of Hand Therapists (AETD) and whose validity and reliability have been confirmed in numerous studies.
This device is considered the gold standard for measuring hand grip strength.
Measurements will be taken before and after treatment, and three times, 10 seconds apart.
Each measurement will be taken at the same difficulty level.
Generally, the average of the three measurements will be taken.
|
through of the study, average 8 weeks
|
|
Hand skills
Time Frame: through of the study, average 8 weeks
|
The Nine-Hole Peg test, used to assess manual dexterity, involves patients quickly removing nine wooden pegs from a storage box, placing them in random holes, then collecting them from the holes and returning them to the storage compartment.
The time is measured in seconds using a stopwatch, and anything over 20 seconds is considered a "loss of skill."
|
through of the study, average 8 weeks
|
|
Short form SF-36 Quality of life
Time Frame: through of the study, average 8 weeks
|
Individuals' quality of life will be assessed using short form 36 (SF-36).
SF-36 is a 36-question scale consisting of physical function, physical role, emotional role, pain, vitality, general health, and mental health subscales.
|
through of the study, average 8 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Upper extremity functionality
Time Frame: through of the study, average 8 weeks
|
The Questionnaire for Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Disabilities (Q-DASH) will be used to assess individuals' upper extremity functions.
This questionnaire is a self-administered measurement tool with validated validity and reliability in Turkish.
The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the DASH questionnaire (DASH-T) was conducted in Turkey by Düger et al. in 2006.
The questionnaire, consisting of 30 questions, assesses the individual's ability to perform functional activities (21 items), pain (5 items), and psychosocial aspects of the disease (4 items).
The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better outcomes.
|
through of the study, average 8 weeks
|
|
Range of Motion
Time Frame: through of the study, average 8 weeks
|
A Universal Goniometer will be used to assess normal range of motion.
Measurements will be made regarding shoulder flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal and external rotation ranges of motion in three planes of the upper extremity shoulder joint, and the results will be recorded in degrees.
|
through of the study, average 8 weeks
|
|
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: through of the study, average 8 weeks
|
This is the measure we will use to assess patients' fear of movement in our study.
This scale, frequently used in the literature, is based on fear avoidance, fear of work-related activities, and fear of movement or re-injury.
|
through of the study, average 8 weeks
|
|
Daily living activities
Time Frame: through of the study, average 8 weeks
|
It is a 15-question questionnaire that measures the severity of wrist pain and the level of disability in daily life activities.
|
through of the study, average 8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tuğba Çevik, Hasan Kalyoncu University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Yakut Y, Yakut E, Bayar K, Uygur F. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version short-form McGill pain questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Jul;26(7):1083-7. doi: 10.1007/s10067-006-0452-6. Epub 2006 Nov 15.
- Sheereen FJ, Sarkar B, Sahay P, Shaphe MA, Alghadir AH, Iqbal A, Ali T, Ahmad F. Comparison of Two Manual Therapy Programs, including Tendon Gliding Exercises as a Common Adjunct, While Managing the Participants with Chronic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Pain Res Manag. 2022 Jun 8;2022:1975803. doi: 10.1155/2022/1975803. eCollection 2022.
- Ennaciri B, Mahfoud M, El Bardouni A, Berrada MS. Exceptional laceration of flexor digitorum tendons proximal to a severe palmar hand wound: a case report with literature review. Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Nov 20;22:266. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.22.266.7495. eCollection 2015.
- Mattar TG, Junior RM, Cho AB, Paula EJ, Rezende MR. COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN TRADITIONAL TENOLYSES AND WITH INTRAOPERATIVE AWAKENING PERFORMED ON THE FLEXOR OSTEOFIBROUS TUNNEL REGION OF THE HANDS (ZONE 2). Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Dec 8;44(4):324-9. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30161-0. eCollection 2009 Jan.
- Quadlbauer S, Pezzei Ch, Jurkowitsch J, Reb P, Beer T, Leixnering M. Early Passive Movement in flexor tendon injuries of the hand. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Feb;136(2):285-93. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2362-z. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
- Watanabe K, Ota H, Sasaki H. Eight-strand Cross-locked Cruciate Flexor Tendon Repair Using Double-stranded Suture: A Description of the Surgical Technique. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Nov 7;4(11):e1048. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001048. eCollection 2016 Nov.
- Stevens KA, Caruso JC, Fallahi AKM, Patino JM. Flexor Tendon Lacerations. 2023 Jun 20. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493223/
- Ranjan V, Mehta M, Mehta M, Mishra P, Joshi T, Kumar T. The Outcomes of Flexor Tendon Injury Repair of the Hand: A Clinico-Epidemiological Study. Cureus. 2023 Jan 18;15(1):e33912. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33912. eCollection 2023 Jan.
- Moradi A, Menendez ME, Kachooei AR, Isakov A, Ring D. Update of the Quick DASH Questionnaire to Account for Modern Technology. Hand (N Y). 2016 Dec;11(4):403-409. doi: 10.1177/1558944715628006. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2025/092
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Exercise
-
Centre Hospitalier de CorbieRecruitingExercise Training | Cardiac Rehabilitation | Exercise Intolerance | Exercise Intervention | Exercise Adaptations | HFrEF - Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionFrance
-
Bitlis Eren UniversityCompletedExercise Physiology | Exercise ImmunologyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Hamza KucukCompletedExercise Training | Exercise PhysiologyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Faculdade de Motricidade HumanaCompletedGreen Exercise | Indoor ExercisePortugal
-
Lindenwood UniversityIncrenovo, LLCRecruitingCognitive Function | Blood Flow | Nitric Oxide | Endurance Exercise | Exercise Performance | Exercise RecoveryUnited States
-
Egas Moniz - Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, CRLCompletedAgeing | Aerobic Exercise | Resistance Exercise | Combined ExercisePortugal
-
Universidad Rey Juan CarlosCompletedEndurance Exercise | Running Performance | Exercise PhysiologySpain
-
Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim UniversityT.C. Dumlupınar ÜniversitesiCompletedExercise Ergogenics | Recovery Methods | Carnitine Ingestion | Exercise Fatigue | Exercise and RecoveryTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Hasan Kalyoncu UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of HawaiiKlein Buendel, Inc.CompletedMomZing Exercise Videos Online | Standard Exercise DVDUnited States
Clinical Trials on Fascial mobilization therapy
-
Hasan Kalyoncu UniversityCompletedPost Partum | Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) | Fascial MobilizationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedAdhesive CapsulitisPakistan
-
Rocky Mountain University of Health ProfessionsFranklin Pierce University; Section on Women's Health American Physical Therapy...UnknownCicatrix | Cesarean Section | Tissue AdhesionsUnited States
-
Hacettepe UniversityUnknown
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
Karabuk UniversityCompleted
-
Sheba Medical CenterCompleted
-
Mardin Artuklu UniversityEnrolling by invitationObstructive Sleep Apnea SyndromesTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Karabuk UniversityRecruiting
-
University of GaziantepRecruitingPostural; Defect | Tension-Type Headache | Proprioceptive Disorders | Pain, Neck | Craniovertebral; SyndromeTurkey