Comparative Evaluation of Finger Splint, Paraffin, and Peloidotherapy Interventions in the Management of Trigger Finger

March 17, 2026 updated by: Ramazan Yılmaz, MD, Konya Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital

Comparative Evaluation of Finger Splint, Paraffin, and Peloidotherapy Interventions in the Management of Trigger Finger. A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

Patients aged 18-75 years who present with trigger finger to a tertiary rehabilitation hospital and agree to participate will be included in the study. Participants will be randomly allocated into three groups using block randomization. The first group will use a static finger splint that blocks the proximal interphalangeal joint for 6 weeks, along with a home exercise program. The second group will receive paraffin bath therapy, and the third group will receive peloidotherapy, both in combination with home exercises.

All patients will receive education about the disease and activity modification. The finger joint-restricting splint and exercises will be applied for 6 weeks. Evaluations will be conducted at baseline, at the end of the 3rd week, and at the end of the 6th week by a blinded assessor. No analgesic or anti-inflammatory medication will be permitted during the study, and patients will be instructed to avoid using analgesics within 24 hours prior to each assessment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients aged between 18 and 75 years who were diagnosed with trigger finger and agreed to participate in the study will be included. A total of 60 patients who have applied to the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinics of the University of Health Sciences Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital will be enrolled. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, eligible and willing participants will be randomly assigned to three groups using block randomization.

The first group will be instructed to use a static finger splint that blocks the proximal interphalangeal joint for 6 weeks and will also follow a home exercise program. The second group will receive paraffin bath therapy for 20 minutes per day, 15 sessions over 3 weeks, together with a home exercise program. The third group will receive peloidotherapy at 45°C for 20 minutes per day, consisting of 15 sessions over 3 weeks, in conjunction with a home exercise program.

A static finger splint that restricts the proximal interphalangeal joint and maintains it in extension will be provided to the patients. They will be instructed to wear the splint continuously during both day and night, removing it only for hygiene or essential needs. The splint will be worn for 6 weeks until the completion of the study, and the daily duration of splint use will be recorded for each patient.

The home exercise program will include finger passive and active range of motion exercises (passive fist-making and active range of motion without triggering), tendon gliding, self-administered gentle A1 pulley stretching, and gentle deep circular massage. The exercises will be demonstrated to each patient in practice by a physician or physiotherapist and taught using printed visual materials. Patients will be specifically instructed, encouraged, and monitored to ensure exercise adherence. Those with an adherence rate below 70-75% will be excluded from the study.

All patients will receive education about the disease and will be advised on activity modification. Evaluations will be performed before treatment, at the end of the 3rd week, and at the end of the 6th week. A blinded assessor will conduct detailed examinations and evaluate the groups in terms of the study's primary and secondary outcome measures.

Patients' baseline sociodemographic and clinical data will be recorded, and a detailed physical examination will be performed. Pain intensity, trigger frequency, severity, and functional impact will be evaluated using a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Clinical staging of the trigger finger will be determined according to Green's classification (Grades 1-4). Patient compliance with orthotic use and exercise will be documented. Ultrasound assessments, including tendons thickness, A1 pulley thickness, and the presence of effusion (semiquantitative) will be performed by a blinded researcher with over five years of experience in musculoskeletal ultrasonography. In addition, patients' satisfaction levels will be evaluated and recorded using the Patient Global Improvement Scale. Any potential treatment-related undesirable effects effects will also be documented.

No analgesic or anti-inflammatory medication will be prescribed during the treatment period. Additionally, patients will be informed not to take any analgesic medication within 24 hours before the assessments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Konya
      • Konya, Konya, Turkey (Türkiye), 42080
        • Recruiting
        • Konya Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being between 18 and 75 years of age and willing to participate in the study
  • Having a diagnosis of idiopathic single trigger finger, Grade 2-3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with triggering in more than one finger
  • Patients with triggering at the A3 pulley or with Grade 1 or Grade 4 trigger finger
  • Patients with thumb (pollex) trigger finger
  • Patients who have undergone any injection or interventional procedure (release surgery) for trigger finger within the past 6 months
  • Patients who have received physical therapy for the hand within the past 6 months
  • Patients currently using corticosteroids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
  • Patients with inflammatory or autoimmune rheumatologic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, gout, or psoriatic arthritis
  • Patients with other musculoskeletal disorders (e.g., carpal tunnel syndrome, de Quervain's tenosynovitis, symptomatic hand osteoarthritis, or Dupuytren's contracture) or neurological diseases (e.g., stroke-related hemiparesis, spinal cord injury, brachial plexus injury, multiple sclerosis, or Parkinsonism) affecting the same hand
  • Patients with musculoskeletal disorders causing pain and/or limitation in the proximal upper extremity on the affected side (e.g., periarthritis, lateral epicondylitis, mononeuropathy, or radiculopathy)
  • Patients with significant metabolic diseases (e.g., hypothyroidism, Cushing's syndrome, or uncontrolled diabetes)
  • Patients with any condition that may interfere with treatment, such as open wounds, rashes, local infections, or active malignant disease of the hand
  • Patients with a history of hand trauma (chronic or repetitive)
  • Patients unwilling to complete the self-assessment questionnaires either independently or with assistance
  • Pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Finger orthosis
The group receiving the finger joint-blocking orthosis
Joint-blocking finger orthosis plus home-based exercise therapy
Experimental: Paraffin bath
The group receiving paraffin bath therapy
Paraffin bath plus home-based exercise therapy
Experimental: Peloidotherapy
The group receiving peloidotherapy
Peloidotherapy plus home-based exercise therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS pain
Time Frame: Baseline, week 3 and week 6
VAS pain: 0 no pain; 10 unbearable/max. pain.
Baseline, week 3 and week 6
Green's classification (Grades 1-4)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 2 and week 6

Trigger finger classified according to Green's classification (Grades 1-4) Grade 1 - Pretriggering: Pain in the palm and tenderness over the A1 pulley, with a history of triggering not demonstrable on examination.

Grade 2 - Active Triggering: Triggering is clinically evident, but the patient can actively extend the finger.

Grade 3 - Passive Triggering:

3a: Locking is present and requires passive extension.

3b: Locking is present, and the patient cannot actively flex the finger.

Grade 4 - Contracture: The finger is completely locked with a fixed flexion contracture at the PIP joint.

Baseline, week 2 and week 6
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 2 and week 6
The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) is a comprehensive self-reported questionnaire developed to evaluate hand function, pain, and patient satisfaction. It is used to assess the functional status of individuals with upper extremity disorders and consists of six subscales: Overall Hand Function, Activities of Daily Living, Work Performance, Pain, Aesthetics, and Satisfaction. The Turkish version of the MHQ has undergone linguistic and cultural adaptation processes, and its validity and reliability have been established. Studies have demonstrated that the Turkish MHQ has high internal consistency and test-retest reliability, supporting its use in both clinical practice and research for assessing hand and wrist problems. The MHQ is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 100. Except for the pain subscale, higher scores indicate better hand function and satisfaction, whereas higher pain scores represent greater pain intensity. The overall hand health status is determined by cal
Baseline, week 2 and week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Global Impression of Change
Time Frame: Week 2 and week 6

Patient Global Impression of Change (Improvement):

1: Very much improved 2: Much improved 3: Minimally improved 4: No change 5: Minimally worse 6: Much worse 7: Very much worse

Week 2 and week 6
Ultrasonographic evaluation of the trigger finger
Time Frame: Baseline, week 2 and week 6
Ultrasonographic evaluation of the trigger finger will be performed using a LA2-14A transducer. The hand and forearm will be positioned with the palmar surface facing upward (full supination) and the wrist maintained in a neutral position. The ultrasound examination will begin in the longitudinal plane and then proceed to the transverse plane. The MCP joint, flexor tendons, and volar will be identified. At the level of the MCP joint, the transducer will be rotated to obtain a transverse image along the long axis of the flexor digitorum tendons. The thin layer located between the hyperechoic A1 pulley and the hyperechoic surface of the flexor digitorum tendons will represent the synovial fluid space, appearing as a hypoechoic band on ultrasonography. The thickness of the A1 pulley will be defined as the distance between its superior and inferior margins, including the hyperechoic region. The maximum thickness of the A1 pulley above the MCP joint will be measured and recorded.
Baseline, week 2 and week 6
Ultrasonographic evaluation of the trigger finger
Time Frame: Baseline, week 2 and week 6
The cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of the flexor digitorum tendons will also be measured using a similar approach as described above. At the level of the MCP joint, the maximum CSAs of the flexor digitorum tendons will be manually traced in the transverse view along the outer hyperechoic contour. The average of three measurements will be calculated and recorded. Similar measurements will be performed on the corresponding finger of the contralateral healthy hand and recorded for comparison.
Baseline, week 2 and week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ramazan Yilmaz, Assoc Prof, Konya Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 15, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Efficacy and Safety

Clinical Trials on Finger orthosis

Subscribe