The Effects of Chiropractic on Adults With Depression (DEP)

May 1, 2026 updated by: Tyson Perez, DC, PhD, Life University

The Effects of Chiropractic on Adults With Depression: a Pilot Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility of the study design in preparation for a future clinical trial examining chiropractic care for adults with mild to moderate depression. We aim to determine whether the study procedures function as intended, including the ability to recruit, retain, and engage participants, as well as whether the intervention is implemented as planned.

The main questions it aims to answer is:

  1. Can sufficient eligible participants be enrolled within the planned timeframe?
  2. Is there any retention of participant throughout the study duration and the factors contributing to ongoing participation?
  3. Can participants adhere to pre-treatment instructions and protocols before their first check-up?
  4. Can participants attend and complete all assessments and chiropractic sessions?
  5. Can participants fulfill all required study activities without excessive burden?
  6. Can chiropractors strictly follow chiropractic adjustments only, without offering any additional treatments?

Researchers will compare adults with depression on the waitlist group to see if chiropractic care effects on adults with depression.

Participants will

  • Perform resting state Electrocardiography (ECG)
  • Perform resting state Electroencephalography (EEG)
  • Perform Event-related potential (ERP) à Auditory and visual stimuli tests
  • Complete Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)
  • COMPASS-31
  • PROMIS-29
  • PROMIS-Cog-8
  • Perceived Stress Scale
  • Depression Short Form 8a
  • Complete Assessment of Acceptability
  • Complete Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
  • Receive 6 weeks of chiropractic care treatment

Study Overview

Status

Suspended

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The investigators shall recruit 20 participants for each group, who are currently aged between 18 and 65 years and have mild to moderate depression which is measured by T score.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30067
        • Center for Chiropractic Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-65 years of age
  • Mild (T-score 55-59) to moderate (T-score 60-69) depression, as measured by the PROMIS® Depression - Short Form 8a, an 8-question survey that assesses symptoms like sadness and hopelessness.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe suicidal risk
  • Diagnosed with any untreated or uncontrolled externalizing disorders (like substance use or antisocial disorder) or thought disorders (like schizophrenia, paranoid personality, or bipolar).
  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, or cervical spine instability
  • Has hearing impairments (task involves auditory stimuli)
  • Currently pregnant (if applicable)
  • Chiropractic adjustment within the past 2 weeks
  • Scalp injuries or surgeries within the past 3 months
  • Prescribed short-acting benzodiazepines, which include midazolam & triazolam
  • Current litigation related to a physical, health-related injury.
  • Diagnosed heart conditions, including pacemakers.
  • Living with and/or caring for someone with a diagnosed neuropsychiatric disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Waitlist Group (WL)
After the 6-week lab assessments, the participants in the waitlist (WL) group will be offered 6 weeks of chiropractic care.
Participants of the treatment group will be randomly assigned to chiropractic care for 6 weeks. Participants will have their upper cervical spine (C1/C2) assessed for the presence of vertebral subluxations per the chiropractor's normal and customary procedures.
Experimental: Intervention Group
Within the 6-week lab assessments, the participants in the intervention group will receive 6 weeks of chiropractic care.
Participants of the treatment group will be randomly assigned to chiropractic care for 6 weeks. Participants will have their upper cervical spine (C1/C2) assessed for the presence of vertebral subluxations per the chiropractor's normal and customary procedures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Sufficient Eligible Participants Enrolled
Time Frame: 1 year
The proportion of screened participants enrolled within the recruitment timeframe. This assesses recruitment
1 year
Number of Enrolled Control Group Participants
Time Frame: 1 year
Proportion of enrolled control group participants who complete the final onsite assessment. This assesses retention.
1 year
Number of Participants Who Adhere to Study
Time Frame: 1 year
Proportion of enrolled participants who adhere to the pre-baseline assessment lifestyle restrictions as instructed. This assesses compliance
1 year
Number of Participants Who Chiropractic Sessions
Time Frame: 1 year
Proportion of participants attending 90% of chiropractic sessions within 7 weeks. This assesses adherence to treatment
1 year
Number of Participants That Can Fulfill Study Activities
Time Frame: 1 year
Proportion of participants that can fulfill all required study activities without excessive burden. This assesses tolerability
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart Activity (ECG/HRV)
Time Frame: 1 year
Change from bassline in differences in heart rate variability (HRV)
1 year
Brain Activity (Resting EEG)
Time Frame: 1 year
Changes in baseline of resting-state brain wave patterns (alpha, beta, theta, delta, gamma).
1 year
Event-Related Potentials (ERP)
Time Frame: 1 year
Changes from bassline in brain responses to auditory oddball stimuli (e.g., P300 and MMN components), visual oddball stimuli (e.g., N100, N200, P300 ERP components), load-picture stimuli (e.g., N100, N200, P300 ERP components) using EEG.
1 year
Change in Brain-Heart Interplay
Time Frame: 1 year
Changes in baseline of brain and heart activity to understand potential mechanisms of change utilizing EEG and HRV test such as postural challenge and EEG brain wave recordings.
1 year
Assessment of Acceptability
Time Frame: 1 year
Participant ratings of acceptability from the participant's perspective, including their experiences with care, interaction with providers, and overall satisfaction with study participation.
1 year
Changes in Columbia Suicide Severity Scale
Time Frame: 1 year
Change from baseline in suicide risk level measured using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). This tool assesses the presence and severity of suicidal ideation and behavior using six standardized yes/no items. The outcome is the highest level of suicide risk endorsed. Higher scores indicate greater suicide risk.
1 year
Changes in COMPASS-31
Time Frame: 1 year
Changes from baseline of self-reported outcomes of neurodegenerative system symptoms utilizing the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-3 scale. Score range from 0-100. A higher score would indicate worse autonomic symptom severity.
1 year
Changes in PROMIS-29
Time Frame: 1 year
Changes from baseline of self-reported outcomes of a comprehensive overview of a patient's physical, mental, and social health utilizing the PROMIS-29 scale. T scores range from 20-80 with a higher score indicating better health.
1 year
Changes in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: 1 year
Change from baseline of self-reported symptoms of stress utilizing the Perceived Stress Scale 10. Score ranges from 0-40. A lower score indicates less stress, and a higher score indicates high stress.
1 year
Changes in PROMIS-Cog 8
Time Frame: 1 year
Changes from baseline of self-reported cognitive abilities, such as memory, attention, and decision-making utilizing the PROMIS-Cog 8 scale. T scores range from 20-80. A higher T score range indicates better cognitive functioning.
1 year
Change in PROMIS Depression 8a
Time Frame: 1 year

Change from baseline in depressive symptoms measured using the PROMIS Depression Short Form 8a. This questionnaire assesses negative mood, sadness, loss of interest, hopelessness, and related depressive symptoms over the past 7 days. Raw scores from the 8 items are converted into a single PROMIS T-score 20-80, representing overall depression severity.

Higher T-scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity.

1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • I-0035

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression Disorder

Clinical Trials on Chiropractic Care

Subscribe