Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) Versus Inhalational Anesthesia at The End of Laparoscopic Obstetric Surgery Regarding Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

November 26, 2025 updated by: Mohamed Ashraf kamel, Assiut University

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remain among the most common and distressing complications after general anaesthesia, with important consequences for patient comfort, satisfaction, recovery trajectories, and length of stay following surgery. The incidence of PONV is especially high after laparoscopic and gynaecological procedures due to patient- and procedure-related risk factors, making effective prevention and management a priority in perioperative care [5,8].

Anaesthetic technique is a recognized, modifiable determinant of PONV. Numerous clinical trials and randomized studies have demonstrated that the choice between propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) and volatile inhalational maintenance can materially influence PONV incidence. Propofol-based TIVA has been repeatedly associated with lower rates of early and overall PONV compared with volatile agents in diverse surgical populations, supporting its role as an antiemetic strategy in addition to pharmacologic prophylaxis [1,2,4,9].

Trials specifically conducted in gynaecological and laparoscopic surgical populations report consistent reductions in nausea and vomiting with propofol maintenance compared with isoflurane or other volatile agents. These procedure-specific data are directly relevant to studies in gynecological laparoscopy, where baseline PONV risk is elevated and where anesthetic technique may yield a clinically meaningful reduction in patient morbidity [5,8,9].

Meta-analyses and systematic reviews pooling randomized controlled trials provide higher-level evidence that TIVA reduces the relative risk of PONV compared with volatile anaesthesia. Trial-sequential and pooled analyses estimate a clinically important risk reduction favoring TIVA, although effect sizes vary with study populations, prophylactic antiemetic regimens, and outcome time windows; these syntheses underpin the rationale for a targeted randomized comparison in the gynecological laparoscopic setting [2,4,10].

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

98

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female, age 18-50 years.
  • Elective laparoscopic procedure under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation.
  • Expected surgical duration ≥ 30 minutes. -.Ability to consent and complete questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²; severe cardiopulmonary disease; hepatic/renal failure.
  • History of malignant hyperthermia or contraindication to study drugs.
  • Known allergy to propofol, , , sevoflurane/desflurane.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A
patients will be offed from inhalational anesthesia and Switched to propofol TIVA for the final 10 minutes of surgery
patients will be offed from inhalational anesthesia
patients will be Switched Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA)
Active Comparator: Group B
patients will be Continued on inhalational anaesthesia (sevoflurane or isoflurane per protocol)during the same final phase through extubation.
patients will be offed from inhalational anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of post operative neasea
Time Frame: 24 hours
Any episode of nausea (NRS ≥ 4/10 or requiring treatment)
24 hours
incidance of postoperative vomting
Time Frame: 24 hours
any episode of vomiting/retching recorded at 0-2, 2-6, and 6-24 h; need for rescue antiemetic
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • tiva vs inhala anesth in ponv

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Obstetric Surgery

Clinical Trials on inhalational anaesthesia

Subscribe