- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06476574
Retentive Capacity of Bonded Retainer Vs Vacuum-formed and Combined Bonded-vacuum Retainers
Retentive Capacity of Bonded Retainer Versus Vacuum-formed and Combined Bonded-vacuum Retainers: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
The main goal is to test the differences between the retentive capacity of fixed retainer, vacuum-formed retainer & combination of both; and recommend the most effective protocol for retention of lower incisors crowding treated by non-extraction treatment plan
The main question is: In patients with lower incisors crowding treated by non-extraction treatment plans, what is the difference in retentive capacity between fixed retainer, vacuum formed retainer and combined bonded and vacuum retainers in maintaining corrected lower anterior segment crowding? After enrolment, each participant will have the orthodontic appliance debonded, the adhesive remnant removed and the enamel surface polished. An alginate impression will be taken to be poured into a study model which will be scanned to obtain STL files for digital models. All patients will have periodontal charting and probing depths recorded for the lower anterior segment. According to the randomization, each patient will be assigned to a group to receive the retainer. All patients will be called for follow-up after 1 week, 1 and 3 months.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Research objective: Retention is a key part of success of orthodontic treatment. Unless we can maintain the teeth in position after orthodontic treatment, the beneficial results of the treatment can be lost. There are currently many different types, designs and materials of removable and fixed retainers and it is unclear which retainers are the best, and how long they should be used for. There is also little knowledge about the possible adverse effects on the Periodontal health, patients' satisfaction and compliance are better with which type of retainers; and which retainers have the greatest failure rate. The dual retention protocol -combined vacuum and fixed retainers- is widely used among clinicians but without strong evidence on its effectiveness compared to the use of single retainer.
Research procedure in brief:
This study will be carried out on patients enrolled from the Outpatient Clinic of Orthodontics department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.
Eligibility criteria:
Inclusion criteria:
- Adult patients
- Finished non-extraction orthodontic treatment
- Full set of permanent dentition (excluding third molars).
- Good oral hygiene
- No restorations on lower anterior teeth or morphologic crown anomalies.
- Little's irregularity index score 0
Exclusion criteria:
- Systemic disease or drugs affecting periodontal health.
- Smokers
- Poor oral health that precludes orthodontic treatment (presence of caries, active white spots, or periodontal diseases).
Interventions:
- Every patient will be examined for any systemic disease or dental hard or soft tissue pathology, and the eligibility for previously mentioned eligibility criteria will be checked.
- The purpose of the study and the details of the intervention and control will be explained for the patient and they will be asked whether they are willing to
- participate in the study and accordingly will sign an informed consent. Post orthodontic treatment records (study models, digital models and intra-oral photos) will be taken for every patient as part of the routine procedure for the treatment of patients in the outpatient clinic of the Orthodontic Department, Cairo University. And used as pre-intervention records
Clinical Procedure:
- After taking post-treatment records, every patient will have the orthodontic appliance debonded, the adhesive remnant removed and the enamel surface polished
- An alginate impression will be taken to be poured into a study model.
- Study models will be scanned to obtain STL files for digital models.
- All patients will have periodontal charting and probing depth recorded for the lower anterior segment.
- According to the randomization, each patient will be assigned to a group to receive the retainer.
- All patients will be called for follow-up after 1 week, 1 and 3 months.
Intervention group I:
Vacuum-formed retainer.
- After patient finishes orthodontic treatment, the fixed orthodontic appliance will be debonded; finishing and polishing of the enamel surface will be done.
- An alginate impression will be taken to be poured into a working model for fabrication of the Vacuum-formed retainer; 1mm Hard vacuum sheet will be used.
- The retainer will be finished and delivered to the patient.
- The patient will be instructed to wear the retainer night time only and to contact us if any damage occurred to the retainers for immediate replacement; and he will be supplied with a check list to evaluate the compliance and to calculate the wearing hours.
- Another alginate impression will be taken for fabrication of the study model which will later be scanned to obtain the digital model at T0; and a periodontal chart will be filled to record the periodontal status at T0 (before wearing of the retainer).
Intervention group II:
Combined Vacuum-formed and Lingual bonded retainer from canine-to-canine.
- After patient finishes orthodontic treatment, the fixed orthodontic appliance will be debonded; finishing and polishing of the enamel surface will be done.
- A multistrand rectangular stainless steel retainer wire will be bonded to the lingual surface of the lower anterior teeth, from the canine-to-canine bonded to all six anteriors; followed by an alginate impression; the impression will be poured into a working model for fabrication of the Vacuum-formed retainer; 1mm Hard vacuum sheet will be used.
- The retainer will be finished and delivered to the patient.
- The patient will be instructed to wear the Vacuum retainer night time only and to contact us if any damage occurred to the retainers for immediate replacement or rebonding of the detached parts of the bonded retainer; and will be supplied with a check list to evaluate the compliance and to calculate the wearing hours.
- Another alginate impression will be taken (with the bonded retainer in place) for fabrication of the study model which will later be scanned to obtain the digital model at T0; and a periodontal chart will be filled to record the periodontal status at T0 (at the same visit of the delivery of the bonded retainer).
Control group III:
Lingual bonded retainer from canine-to-canine.
- After patient finishes orthodontic treatment, the fixed orthodontic appliance will be debonded; finishing and polishing of the enamel surface will be done.
- A multistrand rectangular stainless steel retainer wire will be bonded to the lingual surface of the lower anterior teeth, from the canine-to-canine bonded to all six anteriors.
- The patient will be instructed to contact us if any damage occurred to the retainers for immediate replacement or rebonding of the detached parts of the retainer.
- An alginate impression will be taken (with the bonded retainer in place) for fabrication of the study model which will later be scanned to obtain the digital model at T0; and a periodontal chart will be filled to record the periodontal status at T0 (at the same visit of the delivery of the bonded retainer).
All the three groups will be called for follow up after 1week T1, 1month T2 and 3 months T3.
At each follow up visit, an alginate impression will be taken to obtain a study cast which will be later scanned to get a digital model and a periodontal chart will be filled to evaluate the periodontal condition; also, the integrity of the retainers will be checked together with the rate of failure or debonding of the fixed retainer which will be recorded.
The compliance chart will be collected and a new one will be supplied.
Outcomes: Relapse, Patient's compliance and satisfaction, Periodontal health, Integrity of the retainer.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Hadeer A. ElBehery, Bachelor
- Phone Number: +201064618667
- Email: hadeer.elbehery@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt
- Recruiting
- Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients
- Finished non-extraction orthodontic treatment
- Full set of permanent dentition (excluding third molars).
- Good oral hygiene
- No restorations on lower anterior teeth or morphologic crown anomalies.
- Little's irregularity index score 0
Exclusion Criteria:
- Systemic disease or drugs affecting periodontal health.
- Smokers
- Poor oral health that precludes orthodontic treatment (presence of caries, active white spots,or periodontal diseases)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Vacuum-formed retainer
An alginate impression will be taken to be poured into a working model for fabrication of the Vacuum-formed retainer; 1mm Hard vacuum sheet will be used.
|
|
|
Experimental: Combined Vacuum-formed and Lingual bonded retainer from canine-to-canine.
A multistrand rectangular stainless steel retainer wire will be bonded to the lingual surface of the lower anterior teeth, from the canine-to-canine bonded to all six anteriors; followed by an alginate impression; the impression will be poured into a working model for fabrication of the Vacuum-formed retainer; 1mm Hard vacuum sheet will be used.
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Lingual bonded retainer from canine-to-canine
A multistrand rectangular stainless steel retainer wire will be bonded to the lingual surface of the lower anterior teeth, from the canine-to-canine bonded to all six anteriors.
|
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The stability of the orthodontic treatment result and the degree of relapse from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: Relapse will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
|
The stability of the orthodontic treatment result and the degree of relapse will be measured by superimposition of the digital model at each time point on the initial model after debonding at T0.
|
Relapse will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient's compliance
Time Frame: It will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
|
patients' compliance will be evaluated by the check list supplied at each time point for the groups using removable retainers.
|
It will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
|
|
Periodontal health
Time Frame: It will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
|
Periodontal health will be monitored by a filling a periodontal chart at each time point to check the probing depth, bleeding on probing and calculus formation on the lingual surface of lower anteriors.
|
It will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
|
|
The integrity of the retainers
Time Frame: It will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
|
The integrity of the retainers will be evaluated based on the rate of fracture/ debonding and loss of the retainer.
|
It will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
|
|
Patient's satisfaction
Time Frame: It will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
|
Patients' satisfaction will be evaluated at each follow up visit, the patients in all groups will fill a questionnaire form.
|
It will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hadeer A. ElBehery, Bachelor, Cairo University
- Study Director: Fady H. Fahim, Ass Professor, Cairo University
- Study Chair: Sally M. Reyad, Lecturer, Cairo University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- derosuperstar123
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Orthodontic Relapse
-
Noor Sattar RaheemRecruitingOrthodontic Relapse | Orthodontic Retention ApplianceIraq
-
University of Roma La SapienzaCompletedOrthodontic Relapse | Orthodontic Appliances | Orthodontic ApplianceItaly
-
Poliklinika OrthonovaUniversity of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; University...RecruitingOrthodontic RelapseCroatia
-
Sydney Local Health DistrictActive, not recruiting
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamWithdrawnOrthodontics | Orthodontic Appliance
-
University of AthensActive, not recruitingRelapse | Orthodontic RetentionGreece
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedOrthodontic Patient Experience | Orthodontic | Orthodontic Aligners | Orthodontic Pain (D013850)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
King Abdulaziz UniversityRecruitingOrthodontic Appliance Complication | Orthodontic Appliance Design | Orthodontic TreatmentSaudi Arabia
-
University of BaghdadNot yet recruitingOrthodontic Brackets | Orthodontic Pathological Resorption of External Root | Orthodontic Pain | Orthodentic AppliancesIraq
-
Essraa hassan Hussein MohamedNot yet recruitingOrthodontic Retention Appliance | Clear Orthodontic RetainersEgypt
Clinical Trials on Vacuum-formed retainer
-
University of MalayaUnknownBimaxillary ProclinationMalaysia
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationEgypt
-
Region GävleborgUmeå UniversityCompletedOrthodontics | Retention
-
National University of MalaysiaMinistry of Health, MalaysiaCompletedClinical Trial | Orthodontic RetainersMalaysia
-
University of Sao PauloCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingCleft Lip and Palate | Bilateral Cleft Lip/PalateEgypt
-
University of MalayaCompleted
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingEdentulism | Complete DenturesPakistan
-
Universidad Rey Juan CarlosCompletedPatient Satisfaction | Tooth Sensitivity | Bleaching Efficacy | Gingival IrritationSpain