Retentive Capacity of Bonded Retainer Vs Vacuum-formed and Combined Bonded-vacuum Retainers

June 25, 2024 updated by: Hadeer Ayman Ahmed El Behery, Cairo University

Retentive Capacity of Bonded Retainer Versus Vacuum-formed and Combined Bonded-vacuum Retainers: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The main goal is to test the differences between the retentive capacity of fixed retainer, vacuum-formed retainer & combination of both; and recommend the most effective protocol for retention of lower incisors crowding treated by non-extraction treatment plan

The main question is: In patients with lower incisors crowding treated by non-extraction treatment plans, what is the difference in retentive capacity between fixed retainer, vacuum formed retainer and combined bonded and vacuum retainers in maintaining corrected lower anterior segment crowding? After enrolment, each participant will have the orthodontic appliance debonded, the adhesive remnant removed and the enamel surface polished. An alginate impression will be taken to be poured into a study model which will be scanned to obtain STL files for digital models. All patients will have periodontal charting and probing depths recorded for the lower anterior segment. According to the randomization, each patient will be assigned to a group to receive the retainer. All patients will be called for follow-up after 1 week, 1 and 3 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Research objective: Retention is a key part of success of orthodontic treatment. Unless we can maintain the teeth in position after orthodontic treatment, the beneficial results of the treatment can be lost. There are currently many different types, designs and materials of removable and fixed retainers and it is unclear which retainers are the best, and how long they should be used for. There is also little knowledge about the possible adverse effects on the Periodontal health, patients' satisfaction and compliance are better with which type of retainers; and which retainers have the greatest failure rate. The dual retention protocol -combined vacuum and fixed retainers- is widely used among clinicians but without strong evidence on its effectiveness compared to the use of single retainer.

Research procedure in brief:

This study will be carried out on patients enrolled from the Outpatient Clinic of Orthodontics department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.

Eligibility criteria:

Inclusion criteria:

  • Adult patients
  • Finished non-extraction orthodontic treatment
  • Full set of permanent dentition (excluding third molars).
  • Good oral hygiene
  • No restorations on lower anterior teeth or morphologic crown anomalies.
  • Little's irregularity index score 0

Exclusion criteria:

  • Systemic disease or drugs affecting periodontal health.
  • Smokers
  • Poor oral health that precludes orthodontic treatment (presence of caries, active white spots, or periodontal diseases).

Interventions:

  • Every patient will be examined for any systemic disease or dental hard or soft tissue pathology, and the eligibility for previously mentioned eligibility criteria will be checked.
  • The purpose of the study and the details of the intervention and control will be explained for the patient and they will be asked whether they are willing to
  • participate in the study and accordingly will sign an informed consent. Post orthodontic treatment records (study models, digital models and intra-oral photos) will be taken for every patient as part of the routine procedure for the treatment of patients in the outpatient clinic of the Orthodontic Department, Cairo University. And used as pre-intervention records

Clinical Procedure:

  • After taking post-treatment records, every patient will have the orthodontic appliance debonded, the adhesive remnant removed and the enamel surface polished
  • An alginate impression will be taken to be poured into a study model.
  • Study models will be scanned to obtain STL files for digital models.
  • All patients will have periodontal charting and probing depth recorded for the lower anterior segment.
  • According to the randomization, each patient will be assigned to a group to receive the retainer.
  • All patients will be called for follow-up after 1 week, 1 and 3 months.

Intervention group I:

Vacuum-formed retainer.

  • After patient finishes orthodontic treatment, the fixed orthodontic appliance will be debonded; finishing and polishing of the enamel surface will be done.
  • An alginate impression will be taken to be poured into a working model for fabrication of the Vacuum-formed retainer; 1mm Hard vacuum sheet will be used.
  • The retainer will be finished and delivered to the patient.
  • The patient will be instructed to wear the retainer night time only and to contact us if any damage occurred to the retainers for immediate replacement; and he will be supplied with a check list to evaluate the compliance and to calculate the wearing hours.
  • Another alginate impression will be taken for fabrication of the study model which will later be scanned to obtain the digital model at T0; and a periodontal chart will be filled to record the periodontal status at T0 (before wearing of the retainer).

Intervention group II:

Combined Vacuum-formed and Lingual bonded retainer from canine-to-canine.

  • After patient finishes orthodontic treatment, the fixed orthodontic appliance will be debonded; finishing and polishing of the enamel surface will be done.
  • A multistrand rectangular stainless steel retainer wire will be bonded to the lingual surface of the lower anterior teeth, from the canine-to-canine bonded to all six anteriors; followed by an alginate impression; the impression will be poured into a working model for fabrication of the Vacuum-formed retainer; 1mm Hard vacuum sheet will be used.
  • The retainer will be finished and delivered to the patient.
  • The patient will be instructed to wear the Vacuum retainer night time only and to contact us if any damage occurred to the retainers for immediate replacement or rebonding of the detached parts of the bonded retainer; and will be supplied with a check list to evaluate the compliance and to calculate the wearing hours.
  • Another alginate impression will be taken (with the bonded retainer in place) for fabrication of the study model which will later be scanned to obtain the digital model at T0; and a periodontal chart will be filled to record the periodontal status at T0 (at the same visit of the delivery of the bonded retainer).

Control group III:

Lingual bonded retainer from canine-to-canine.

  • After patient finishes orthodontic treatment, the fixed orthodontic appliance will be debonded; finishing and polishing of the enamel surface will be done.
  • A multistrand rectangular stainless steel retainer wire will be bonded to the lingual surface of the lower anterior teeth, from the canine-to-canine bonded to all six anteriors.
  • The patient will be instructed to contact us if any damage occurred to the retainers for immediate replacement or rebonding of the detached parts of the retainer.
  • An alginate impression will be taken (with the bonded retainer in place) for fabrication of the study model which will later be scanned to obtain the digital model at T0; and a periodontal chart will be filled to record the periodontal status at T0 (at the same visit of the delivery of the bonded retainer).

All the three groups will be called for follow up after 1week T1, 1month T2 and 3 months T3.

At each follow up visit, an alginate impression will be taken to obtain a study cast which will be later scanned to get a digital model and a periodontal chart will be filled to evaluate the periodontal condition; also, the integrity of the retainers will be checked together with the rate of failure or debonding of the fixed retainer which will be recorded.

The compliance chart will be collected and a new one will be supplied.

Outcomes: Relapse, Patient's compliance and satisfaction, Periodontal health, Integrity of the retainer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients
  • Finished non-extraction orthodontic treatment
  • Full set of permanent dentition (excluding third molars).
  • Good oral hygiene
  • No restorations on lower anterior teeth or morphologic crown anomalies.
  • Little's irregularity index score 0

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic disease or drugs affecting periodontal health.
  • Smokers
  • Poor oral health that precludes orthodontic treatment (presence of caries, active white spots,or periodontal diseases)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Vacuum-formed retainer
An alginate impression will be taken to be poured into a working model for fabrication of the Vacuum-formed retainer; 1mm Hard vacuum sheet will be used.
  • After patient finishes orthodontic treatment, the fixed orthodontic appliance will be debonded; finishing and polishing of the enamel surface will be done.
  • An alginate impression will be taken to be poured into a working model for fabrication of the Vacuum-formed retainer; 1mm Hard vacuum sheet will be used.
  • The retainer will be finished and delivered to the patient.
  • The patient will be instructed to wear the retainer night time only and to contact us if any damage occurred to the retainers for immediate replacement; and he will be supplied with a check list to evaluate the compliance and to calculate the wearing hours.
  • Another alginate impression will be taken for fabrication of the study model which will later be scanned to obtain the digital model at T0; and a periodontal chart will be filled to record the periodontal status at T0 (before wearing of the retainer).
Experimental: Combined Vacuum-formed and Lingual bonded retainer from canine-to-canine.
A multistrand rectangular stainless steel retainer wire will be bonded to the lingual surface of the lower anterior teeth, from the canine-to-canine bonded to all six anteriors; followed by an alginate impression; the impression will be poured into a working model for fabrication of the Vacuum-formed retainer; 1mm Hard vacuum sheet will be used.
  • A multistrand rectangular stainless steel retainer wire will be bonded to the lingual surface of the lower anterior teeth, from the canine-to-canine bonded to all six anteriors; followed by an alginate impression; the impression will be poured into a working model for fabrication of the Vacuum-formed retainer; 1mm Hard vacuum sheet will be used & it will be finished and delivered to the patient.
  • The patient will be instructed to wear the Vacuum retainer night time only and to contact us if any damage occurred to the retainers for immediate replacement or rebonding of the detached parts of the bonded retainer; and will be supplied with a check list to evaluate the compliance and to calculate the wearing hours.
  • Another alginate impression will be taken (with the bonded retainer in place) for fabrication of the study model which will later be scanned to obtain the digital model at T0; and a periodontal chart will be filled to record the periodontal status at T0.
Active Comparator: Lingual bonded retainer from canine-to-canine
A multistrand rectangular stainless steel retainer wire will be bonded to the lingual surface of the lower anterior teeth, from the canine-to-canine bonded to all six anteriors.
  • After patient finishes orthodontic treatment, the fixed orthodontic appliance will be debonded; finishing and polishing of the enamel surface will be done.
  • A multistrand rectangular stainless steel retainer wire will be bonded to the lingual surface of the lower anterior teeth, from the canine-to-canine bonded to all six anteriors.
  • The patient will be instructed to contact us if any damage occurred to the retainers for immediate replacement or rebonding of the detached parts of the retainer.
  • An alginate impression will be taken (with the bonded retainer in place) for fabrication of the study model which will later be scanned to obtain the digital model at T0; and a periodontal chart will be filled to record the periodontal status at T0 (at the same visit of the delivery of the bonded retainer).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The stability of the orthodontic treatment result and the degree of relapse from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: Relapse will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
The stability of the orthodontic treatment result and the degree of relapse will be measured by superimposition of the digital model at each time point on the initial model after debonding at T0.
Relapse will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient's compliance
Time Frame: It will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
patients' compliance will be evaluated by the check list supplied at each time point for the groups using removable retainers.
It will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
Periodontal health
Time Frame: It will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
Periodontal health will be monitored by a filling a periodontal chart at each time point to check the probing depth, bleeding on probing and calculus formation on the lingual surface of lower anteriors.
It will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
The integrity of the retainers
Time Frame: It will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
The integrity of the retainers will be evaluated based on the rate of fracture/ debonding and loss of the retainer.
It will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
Patient's satisfaction
Time Frame: It will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner
Patients' satisfaction will be evaluated at each follow up visit, the patients in all groups will fill a questionnaire form.
It will be measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the intervention during the follow-up period and will be done by a single calibrated examiner

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hadeer A. ElBehery, Bachelor, Cairo University
  • Study Director: Fady H. Fahim, Ass Professor, Cairo University
  • Study Chair: Sally M. Reyad, Lecturer, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 29, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • derosuperstar123

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Orthodontic Relapse

Clinical Trials on Vacuum-formed retainer

Subscribe