Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Cardiac Coherence Exercise on MRI Success and Image Quality in Claustrophobic Patients (COCARI)

Claustrophobia, an intense fear of confined spaces, can significantly impair the success of MRI examinations by causing patient movement or early termination of the scan, leading to poor image quality. Cardiac coherence, a breathing technique aimed at synchronizing heart rate and reducing anxiety, has shown benefits in stress management. This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether the use of a guided cardiac coherence exercise during MRI can improve exam success rates and image quality in self-reported claustrophobic patients compared to standard care (cartoons for children, music for adults). The primary outcome is the proportion of interpretable MRI scans with good-quality images, assessed blindly by a radiologist. Secondary outcomes include exam duration, use of the emergency call button, patient satisfaction, and perceived comfort. A total of 220 patients aged 7 years and older will be enrolled over 12 months at the Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

220

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged 7 years or older
  • Undergoing a 1.5T or 3T MRI scan as part of routine care
  • Self-reported claustrophobia on the imaging department admission form
  • Explicit consent to participate in the study, provided by the patient or a legal representative (for minors)
  • Affiliated with or beneficiary of a social security system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient under legal protection or guardianship
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Inability to complete questionnaires and/or perform the cardiac coherence exercise as judged by the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cardiac Coherence Breathing Exercise During MRI
Participants in this arm will undergo their MRI scan while a guided cardiac coherence breathing exercise is played via audiovisual support (screen and headphones) throughout the procedure.
The exercise consists of slow, rhythmic breathing guided by visual and auditory cues designed to induce a state of physiological calm.
No Intervention: Standard Care During MRI
Participants in this arm will receive standard care during their MRI scan. As per routine clinical practice, children will be offered to watch a cartoon, and adults will be offered to listen to music during the examination. No specific breathing or relaxation exercise will be provided.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of interpretable MRI exams with good image quality, rated blindly by a radiologist
Time Frame: Day 1

This outcome measures the proportion of MRI exams considered interpretable and of good quality, based on image assessment by a radiologist blinded to the intervention group. Any exam for which all planned sequences could not be acquired is considered a failure. Each image is scored on a 5-point scale:

No artifacts;

Minor artifacts (edges only), not interfering with interpretation;

Moderate artifacts, not interfering with interpretation;

Significant artifacts, partial interpretation possible;

Major artifacts, hindering interpretation. An exam is considered of good quality if all images are rated as 1 or 2.

Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MLC_2025_6

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on MRI

Clinical Trials on cardiac coherence

Subscribe