EIT-Guided PEEP Optimization in Trauma and Postoperative ARDS (EIT-PEEP-SURG)

December 17, 2025 updated by: Nguyen Dang Thu

Electrical Impedance Tomography-Guided Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Optimization in Patients With Trauma-Related and Postoperative Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a serious and often fatal complication in patients following severe trauma or major surgery. Mechanical ventilation is essential for supportive care in this population, but may aggravate lung injury when suboptimal ventilatory settings are applied. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is crucial for maintaining alveolar recruitment; however, optimal PEEP selection in trauma- or postoperative-associated ARDS remains uncertain. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) enables bedside, real-time assessment of regional ventilation and may support optimal PEEP titration by balancing alveolar overdistension and collapse. This study compares EIT-guided PEEP optimization with the conventional low FiO₂-PEEP strategy in terms of oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in patients with moderate to severe ARDS following trauma or surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate whether EIT-guided PEEP titration improves clinical outcomes in patients with trauma- or postoperative-associated ARDS. Adult intubated patients with moderate to severe ARDS were enrolled.

Patients in the intervention group received PEEP settings guided by electrical impedance tomography, whereas those in the control group were managed according to the lower PEEP/FiO₂ table of the ARDS Network. Other ventilatory parameters and oxygenation targets were set in accordance with ARDS Network recommendations. Supportive care and post-trial PEEP management followed standard ARDS treatment protocols.

The primary outcomes included oxygenation and respiratory mechanics. The secondary outcomes comprised 28-day survival, ventilator-free days at day 28, length of ICU and length of hospital stay, rate of successful ventilator weaning, use of adjunctive therapies (prone positioning, neuromuscular blockade, ECMO), newly developed barotrauma (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema) excluding cases attributable to invasive procedures) and changes in the SOFA score.

In the intervention group, PEEP was titrated under the guidance of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) according to a protocol:

  • Preparation: patients underwent airway suctioning and were deeply sedated (RASS ≤ -3) to abolish spontaneous breathing. PEEP titration was performed using an EIT system (Enlight 2100, Timpel SA, Brazil), with a silicone belt containing 32 surface electrodes positioned at the fourth to fifth intercostal space in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
  • Pressure-controlled ventilation was applied with an inspiration pressure set at 15 cmH₂O and a set PEEP of 24 cmH₂O, with a maximum airway pressure limit of 40 cmH₂O. Ventilator settings were maintained for 30 seconds with an FiO₂ of 1.0. A decremental PEEP trial was then performed by reducing PEEP in 2 cmH₂O every 30 seconds until a PEEP of 6 cmH₂O was reached or the SpO₂ decreased to ≤ 80%.
  • The EIT-guided optimal PEEP was defined as the PEEP level corresponding to the intersection point of the collapse and overdistension curves.

Criteria for discontinuing: PEEP titration was terminated if any of the following occurred: a sustained decrease in mean arterial pressure of > 20 mmHg from baseline, SpO₂ < 88%, or the onset of new cardiac arrhythmias. If the event of discontinuation of the procedure, all ventilator settings were reverted to those applied prior to initiation of the PEEP titration.

In the control group, PEEP was set directly and adjusted according to the lower PEEP/FiO₂ table of the ARDS Network.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Hanoi, Vietnam, 10000
        • Recruiting
        • Center for Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Viet Duc University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Luu Quang Thuy, Ass.Prof; Ph.D; M.D
          • Phone Number: (+84) 93608899
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nguyen Viet Minh, M.D

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mechanically ventilated surgical intensive care patients with trauma- or postoperative-associated moderate to severe ARDS, as defined by the 2023 Global Definition of ARDS.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 or >90 years.
  • Severe acute brain injury or acute stroke with Glasgow Coma Scale <8.
  • Thoracic trauma with pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum.
  • End-stage diseases under palliative care (e.g., metastatic cancer, cirrhosis, end-stage renal disease).
  • Severe multiorgan failure with expected survival <7 days.
  • Conditions requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (e.g., Guillain-Barré syndrome, cervical spinal cord injury).
  • Contraindications to hypercapnia (e.g., elevated intracranial pressure, acute coronary syndrome).
  • Prior use of advanced respiratory therapies (e.g., ECMO, inhaled nitric oxide, prone positioning, high-frequency ventilation).
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or skin lesions at electrode placement sites.
  • Implanted electrical devices interfering with EIT (e.g., pacemaker, ICD).
  • Known allergy to electrode materials.
  • Refusal to participate or concurrent enrollment in another study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intervention Group

Device: electrical impedance tomography system (Enlight 2100, Timpel SA, Brazil).

- Patients underwent airway suctioning and were deeply sedated (RASS ≤ -3) to abolish spontaneous breathing. PEEP titration was performed using an EIT system (Enlight 2100, Timpel SA, Brazil), with a silicone belt containing 32 surface electrodes positioned at the fourth to fifth intercostal space in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

Pressure-controlled ventilation was applied with an inspiration pressure set at 15 cmH₂O and a set PEEP of 24 cmH₂O, with a maximum airway pressure limit of 40 cmH₂O. Ventilator settings were maintained for 30 seconds with an FiO₂ of 1.0. A decremental PEEP trial was then performed by reducing PEEP in 2 cmH₂O every 30 seconds until a PEEP of 6 cmH₂O was reached or the SpO₂ decreased to ≤ 80%.

The EIT-guided optimal PEEP was defined as the PEEP level corresponding to the intersection point of the collapse and overdistension curves.

Device: electrical impedance tomography system (Enlight 2100, Timpel SA, Brazil).

- Patients underwent airway suctioning and were deeply sedated (RASS ≤ -3) to abolish spontaneous breathing. PEEP titration was performed using an EIT system (Enlight 2100, Timpel SA, Brazil), with a silicone belt containing 32 surface electrodes positioned at the fourth to fifth intercostal space in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

Pressure-controlled ventilation was applied with an inspiration pressure set at 15 cmH₂O and a set PEEP of 24 cmH₂O, with a maximum airway pressure limit of 40 cmH₂O. Ventilator settings were maintained for 30 seconds with an FiO₂ of 1.0. A decremental PEEP trial was then performed by reducing PEEP in 2 cmH₂O every 30 seconds until a PEEP of 6 cmH₂O was reached or the SpO₂ decreased to ≤ 80%.

The EIT-guided optimal PEEP was defined as the PEEP level corresponding to the intersection point of the collapse and overdistension curves.

Placebo Comparator: Control Group
PEEP was set and adjusted according to the lower PEEP/FiO₂ table of the ARDS Network
PEEP was set and adjusted according to the lower PEEP/FiO₂ table of the ARDS Network

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oxygenation
Time Frame: at day 0, 1, 2, 3
PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio
at day 0, 1, 2, 3
Pulmonary Mechanics
Time Frame: at day 0, 1, 2, 3
Static Compliance
at day 0, 1, 2, 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ventilator free days
Time Frame: up to 28 days
Ventilator free days
up to 28 days
Length of ICU stay
Time Frame: up to 28 days
Days of ICU stay
up to 28 days
Length of mechanical ventilated days
Time Frame: up to 28 days
Days of received mechanical ventilation
up to 28 days
Barotrauma
Time Frame: up to 28 days
pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema
up to 28 days
Rescue therapies
Time Frame: up to 7 days
Neuromuscular blocker using, prone postition, ECMO
up to 7 days
SOFA
Time Frame: at day 0, 1, 2, 3
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment
at day 0, 1, 2, 3
Mortality
Time Frame: up to 28 days
In-hospital mortality rate
up to 28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

January 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Electrical Impedance Tomography

Clinical Trials on EIT-giuded PEEP

Subscribe