Sensory Mechanisms of Manual Dexterity Recovery After Stroke: a Prospective Cohort Study of Prediction and Cerebral Correlates (HapticS 2)

January 5, 2026 updated by: Centre Hospitalier St Anne
In the proposed research, we will assess motor and sensory functions of the hand using clinical tests and a tool designed to measure manual dexterity combined with vibrotactile stimulation. We will also evaluate the integrity of brain structure and function using MRI.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this study, 90 post-stroke patients will be followed over three visits at 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after stroke. Manual dexterity will be assessed using the Dextrain Manipulandum, both with and without the addition of finger vibrations. These vibrations will be delivered using vibratory rings, a tool that has been developed and is currently being validated in healthy participants and in patients with chronic post-stroke conditions. These measurements will allow us to quantify haptic facilitation, that is the impact of adding finger vibrations on hand motor function.

During each of the three visits, we will also administer validated sensory, motor, and cognitive clinical assessments, as well as anatomical, resting-state functional, and diffusion MRI sequences to investigate brain structure and function in relation to this haptic facilitation. These longitudinal measurements will enable the development of biomarkers of motor recovery of manual dexterity after stroke, with the primary objective of improving the prediction of dexterity recovery using a regression model.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First symptomatic stroke, ischaemic or haemorrhagic in the early subacute phase (up to 3 weeks post-stroke)
  • Upper limb paresis (≤4/5 MRC Scale)
  • Ability to grasp, lift and put down 1 block (from the BBT test)
  • Be affiliated to a social security

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of another neurological or musculoskeletal condition affecting upper limb movement
  • Severe cognitive impairment and/or aphasia with inability to understand and carry out instructions
  • Contraindications to MRI (claustrophobia, presence of cochlear implants and/or pacemakers)
  • Persons subject to legal protection measures
  • Persons subject to judicial protection measures
  • Pregnancy
  • Life-threatening conditions or conditions requiring follow-up at 6 months
  • Epilepsy
  • Known hypersensitivity or allergy to silicone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stroke patients in the early subacute phase
Patients will be followed for 6 months over three visits. They will undergo validated sensory, motor, and cognitive clinical assessments, as well as MRI scans and manual dexterity tests performed with and without the addition of vibratory stimulation to the fingers, using a tool previously developed as part of this project.
Both patients and healthy participants will perform manual dexterity tasks using the Dextrain Manipulandum. In addition, they will receive finger vibrations delivered via rings that we have previously developed. These vibrations will have a frequency of 150 Hz and will be delivered for a duration of 150 ms.
Subjects and patients will undergo anatomical, resting-state functional, and diffusion brain MRI sequences.
Active Comparator: Healthy controls matched in age, sex and laterality with stroke patients
Healthy control participants will be assessed during a single visit. They will undergo motor, sensory, and cognitive clinical assessments, as well as manual dexterity tasks performed with and without the addition of finger vibrations using a previously developed tool. They will also undergo anatomical, resting-state functional, and diffusion brain MRI sequences. Each healthy participant will be matched to a patient in terms of age, sex, and handedness of the affected limb. For example, if we include a 60-year-old male post-stroke patient who is right-handed and has a right upper-limb impairment, we will include a healthy male participant aged 60 ± 5 years who is also right-handed.
Both patients and healthy participants will perform manual dexterity tasks using the Dextrain Manipulandum. In addition, they will receive finger vibrations delivered via rings that we have previously developed. These vibrations will have a frequency of 150 Hz and will be delivered for a duration of 150 ms.
Subjects and patients will undergo anatomical, resting-state functional, and diffusion brain MRI sequences.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gain in the prediction of manual dexterity recovery
Time Frame: 3 months post enrollment
The primary outcome measure is a 10% improvement in the prediction of the Box and Block Test (BBT) score at 3 and 6 months post-stroke achieved by adding the haptic effect to a multivariate model.
3 months post enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the prediction of the Box and Block Test (BBT) score when taking into account the haptic effect during an index finger force control task.
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post enrollment
Determine whether the haptic effect calculated during an index finger force control exercise (using the dextrain manipulandum) measured in the acute phase after stroke can improve the prediction of manual dexterity recovery (Box and Blocks Test, BBT) at 3 months and 6 months after stroke.
3 and 6 months post enrollment
Predicting recovery in various clinical tests of motor and sensory function and activity limitations at 3 months and 6 months post-stroke.
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post enrollment
Determine whether the haptic effect VS absence of haptic effect improves the prediction of recovery from motor impairment (Fugl Mayer Assessment for Upper Extremity FMA-UE, Purdue Pegboard Test), sensitivity (monofilaments and Nottingham Sensory Assessment), and activity limitations (Stroke Impact Scale) of the upper limb from 3 weeks to 3 and 6 months post-stroke.
3 and 6 months post enrollment
Difference in functional and structural connectivity between subgroups with vs without haptic effect at 3 and 6 months
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post enrollement
Investigate whether connectivity of fronto-parietal networks at 3 weeks post-stroke predicts recovery of haptic effect and dexterity at 3 and 6 months.
3 and 6 months post enrollement
Changes in the structural and functional connectivity of fronto-parietal networks between 3 weeks and 6 months post-stroke
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post stroke
A difference in the change in connectivity between subgroups with versus without haptic effect at 6 months will be investigated.
3 and 6 months post stroke
Difference in brain connectivity between brain images of healthy subjects and patients 3 weeks post-stroke and healthy subjects and patients 6 months post-stroke.
Time Frame: 6 months post enrollement
Compare brain connectivity between the group of healthy subjects and the group of patients at 3 weeks and 6 months post-stroke.
6 months post enrollement
Correlation between the location of the lesion at 3 weeks and the haptic effect and the results of clinical tests
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post stroke
These correlations will be done using Voxel Based Lesion Symptoms Mapping technique (VLSM)
3 and 6 months post stroke

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Haptic stimulation device

Subscribe